From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH slab hotfixes v2 1/2] mm, slab: suppress warnings in test_leak_destroy kunit test
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2024 06:44:48 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5dd5035c-e924-42e1-8088-225552e53036@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241001-b4-slub-kunit-fix-v2-1-2d995d3ecb49@suse.cz>
On 10/1/24 09:20, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> The test_leak_destroy kunit test intends to test the detection of stray
> objects in kmem_cache_destroy(), which normally produces a warning. The
> other slab kunit tests suppress the warnings in the kunit test context,
> so suppress warnings and related printk output in this test as well.
> Automated test running environments then don't need to learn to filter
> the warnings.
>
> Also rename the test's kmem_cache, the name was wrongly copy-pasted from
> test_kfree_rcu.
>
> Fixes: 4e1c44b3db79 ("kunit, slub: add test_kfree_rcu() and test_leak_destroy()")
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202408251723.42f3d902-oliver.sang@intel.com
> Reported-by: Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAB=+i9RHHbfSkmUuLshXGY_ifEZg9vCZi3fqr99+kmmnpDus7Q@mail.gmail.com/
> Reported-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/6fcb1252-7990-4f0d-8027-5e83f0fb9409@roeck-us.net/
> Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Guenter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-02 13:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-01 16:20 [PATCH slab hotfixes v2 0/2] slub kunit tests fixes for 6.12 Vlastimil Babka
2024-10-01 16:20 ` [PATCH slab hotfixes v2 1/2] mm, slab: suppress warnings in test_leak_destroy kunit test Vlastimil Babka
2024-10-02 13:44 ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
2024-10-01 16:20 ` [PATCH slab hotfixes v2 2/2] slub/kunit: skip test_kfree_rcu when the slub kunit test is built-in Vlastimil Babka
2024-10-02 10:26 ` Vlastimil Babka
2024-10-02 13:52 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-10-02 14:44 ` Vlastimil Babka
2024-10-02 13:46 ` Guenter Roeck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5dd5035c-e924-42e1-8088-225552e53036@roeck-us.net \
--to=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=42.hyeyoo@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=oliver.sang@intel.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox