From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pg0-f71.google.com (mail-pg0-f71.google.com [74.125.83.71]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03FA36B0023 for ; Wed, 28 Mar 2018 13:15:05 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-pg0-f71.google.com with SMTP id i127so1569824pgc.22 for ; Wed, 28 Mar 2018 10:15:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mga07.intel.com (mga07.intel.com. [134.134.136.100]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id w6-v6si3552601plp.547.2018.03.28.10.15.03 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 28 Mar 2018 10:15:03 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 06/14] mm/page_alloc: Propagate encryption KeyID through page allocator References: <20180328165540.648-1-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> <20180328165540.648-7-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> From: Dave Hansen Message-ID: <5d334638-2139-07a1-c999-36a1729173fb@intel.com> Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2018 10:15:02 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180328165540.648-7-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" , Ingo Molnar , x86@kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , "H. Peter Anvin" , Tom Lendacky Cc: Kai Huang , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org On 03/28/2018 09:55 AM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > @@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ static inline struct page *new_page_nodemask(struct page *page, > if (PageHighMem(page) || (zone_idx(page_zone(page)) == ZONE_MOVABLE)) > gfp_mask |= __GFP_HIGHMEM; > > - new_page = __alloc_pages_nodemask(gfp_mask, order, > + new_page = __alloc_pages_nodemask(gfp_mask, order, page_keyid(page), > preferred_nid, nodemask); You're not going to like this suggestion. Am I looking at this too superficially, or does every single site into which you pass keyid also take a node and gfpmask and often an order? I think you need to run this by the keepers of page_alloc.c and see if they'd rather do something more drastic.