From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>,
"Liam R . Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] selftests/mm: put general ksm operation into vm_util
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2025 11:20:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5cadce02-cd80-4aa2-a078-6335beeb8a92@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250716082710.2801-3-richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
On 16.07.25 10:27, Wei Yang wrote:
> There are some general ksm operations could be used by other related
> test case. Put them into vm_util for common use.
>
> This is a preparation patch for later use.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
> Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> Cc: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
> Cc: Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>
> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
> Cc: Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@oracle.com>
>
> ---
> v1: open/close fd in function itself instead of pass as parameter
> ---
> .../selftests/mm/ksm_functional_tests.c | 95 ++-------------
> tools/testing/selftests/mm/vm_util.c | 111 ++++++++++++++++++
> tools/testing/selftests/mm/vm_util.h | 7 ++
> 3 files changed, 126 insertions(+), 87 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/ksm_functional_tests.c b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/ksm_functional_tests.c
> index 6da5c3340e10..0b151f3a29dc 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/ksm_functional_tests.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/ksm_functional_tests.c
> @@ -38,11 +38,6 @@ enum ksm_merge_mode {
> };
>
> static int mem_fd;
> -static int ksm_fd;
> -static int ksm_full_scans_fd;
> -static int proc_self_ksm_stat_fd;
> -static int proc_self_ksm_merging_pages_fd;
> -static int ksm_use_zero_pages_fd;
> static int pagemap_fd;
> static size_t pagesize;
>
> @@ -73,62 +68,6 @@ static bool range_maps_duplicates(char *addr, unsigned long size)
> return false;
> }
>
> -static long get_my_ksm_zero_pages(void)
> -{
> - char buf[200];
> - char *substr_ksm_zero;
> - size_t value_pos;
> - ssize_t read_size;
> - unsigned long my_ksm_zero_pages;
> -
> - if (proc_self_ksm_stat_fd < 0)
> - return 0;
> -
> - read_size = pread(proc_self_ksm_stat_fd, buf, sizeof(buf) - 1, 0);
> - if (read_size < 0)
> - return -errno;
> -
> - buf[read_size] = 0;
> -
> - substr_ksm_zero = strstr(buf, "ksm_zero_pages");
> - if (!substr_ksm_zero)
> - return 0;
> -
> - value_pos = strcspn(substr_ksm_zero, "0123456789");
> - my_ksm_zero_pages = strtol(substr_ksm_zero + value_pos, NULL, 10);
> -
> - return my_ksm_zero_pages;
> -}
> -
> -static long get_my_merging_pages(void)
> -{
> - char buf[10];
> - ssize_t ret;
> -
> - if (proc_self_ksm_merging_pages_fd < 0)
> - return proc_self_ksm_merging_pages_fd;
> -
> - ret = pread(proc_self_ksm_merging_pages_fd, buf, sizeof(buf) - 1, 0);
> - if (ret <= 0)
> - return -errno;
> - buf[ret] = 0;
> -
> - return strtol(buf, NULL, 10);
> -}
> -
> -static long ksm_get_full_scans(void)
> -{
> - char buf[10];
> - ssize_t ret;
> -
> - ret = pread(ksm_full_scans_fd, buf, sizeof(buf) - 1, 0);
> - if (ret <= 0)
> - return -errno;
> - buf[ret] = 0;
> -
> - return strtol(buf, NULL, 10);
> -}
> -
> static int ksm_merge(void)
Should ksm_merge() get factored out as well?
> {
> long start_scans, end_scans;
> @@ -137,7 +76,7 @@ static int ksm_merge(void)
> start_scans = ksm_get_full_scans();
> if (start_scans < 0)
> return start_scans;
> - if (write(ksm_fd, "1", 1) != 1)
> + if (ksm_start_and_merge())
> return -errno;
> do {
> end_scans = ksm_get_full_scans();
> @@ -150,7 +89,7 @@ static int ksm_merge(void)
>
> static int ksm_unmerge(void)
> {
> - if (write(ksm_fd, "2", 1) != 1)
> + if (ksm_stop_and_unmerge())
> return -errno;
> return 0;
What's the reason of gaving ksm_unmerge() and ksm_stop_and_unmerge()?
Probably we should just use ksm_stop_and_unmerge() and remove ksm_unmerge().
See below regarding letting ksm_stop_and_unmerge() and friends return -errno in case of error.
> }
> @@ -168,7 +107,7 @@ static char *__mmap_and_merge_range(char val, unsigned long size, int prot,
> return err_map;
> }
>
> - if (get_my_merging_pages() > 0) {
> + if (ksm_get_self_merging_pages() > 0) {
> ksft_print_msg("Still pages merged\n");
> return err_map;
> }
> @@ -227,7 +166,7 @@ static char *__mmap_and_merge_range(char val, unsigned long size, int prot,
> * Check if anything was merged at all. Ignore the zero page that is
> * accounted differently (depending on kernel support).
> */
> - if (val && !get_my_merging_pages()) {
> + if (val && !ksm_get_self_merging_pages()) {
> ksft_print_msg("No pages got merged\n");
> goto unmap;
> }
> @@ -286,15 +225,7 @@ static void test_unmerge_zero_pages(void)
>
> ksft_print_msg("[RUN] %s\n", __func__);
>
> - if (proc_self_ksm_stat_fd < 0) {
> - ksft_test_result_skip("open(\"/proc/self/ksm_stat\") failed\n");
> - return;
> - }
See below: probably we should do a test read so we know the file exists and
can be read. So we don't get misleading errors later on older kernels.
if (ksm_get_self_zero_pages() < 0) {
ksft_test_result_skip("accessing \"/proc/self/ksm_stat\" failed\n");
return;
}
> - if (ksm_use_zero_pages_fd < 0) {
> - ksft_test_result_skip("open \"/sys/kernel/mm/ksm/use_zero_pages\" failed\n");
> - return;
> - }
> - if (write(ksm_use_zero_pages_fd, "1", 1) != 1) {
> + if (ksm_use_zero_pages()) {
> ksft_test_result_skip("write \"/sys/kernel/mm/ksm/use_zero_pages\" failed\n");
> return;
> }
> @@ -306,7 +237,7 @@ static void test_unmerge_zero_pages(void)
>
> /* Check if ksm_zero_pages is updated correctly after KSM merging */
> pages_expected = size / pagesize;
> - if (pages_expected != get_my_ksm_zero_pages()) {
> + if (pages_expected != ksm_get_self_zero_pages()) {
> ksft_test_result_fail("'ksm_zero_pages' updated after merging\n");
> goto unmap;
> }
> @@ -319,7 +250,7 @@ static void test_unmerge_zero_pages(void)
>
> /* Check if ksm_zero_pages is updated correctly after unmerging */
> pages_expected /= 2;
> - if (pages_expected != get_my_ksm_zero_pages()) {
> + if (pages_expected != ksm_get_self_zero_pages()) {
> ksft_test_result_fail("'ksm_zero_pages' updated after unmerging\n");
> goto unmap;
> }
> @@ -329,7 +260,7 @@ static void test_unmerge_zero_pages(void)
> *((unsigned int *)&map[offs]) = offs;
>
> /* Now we should have no zeropages remaining. */
> - if (get_my_ksm_zero_pages()) {
> + if (ksm_get_self_zero_pages()) {
> ksft_test_result_fail("'ksm_zero_pages' updated after write fault\n");
> goto unmap;
> }
> @@ -685,19 +616,9 @@ static void init_global_file_handles(void)
> mem_fd = open("/proc/self/mem", O_RDWR);
> if (mem_fd < 0)
> ksft_exit_fail_msg("opening /proc/self/mem failed\n");
> - ksm_fd = open("/sys/kernel/mm/ksm/run", O_RDWR);
> - if (ksm_fd < 0)
> - ksft_exit_skip("open(\"/sys/kernel/mm/ksm/run\") failed\n");
> - ksm_full_scans_fd = open("/sys/kernel/mm/ksm/full_scans", O_RDONLY);
> - if (ksm_full_scans_fd < 0)
> - ksft_exit_skip("open(\"/sys/kernel/mm/ksm/full_scans\") failed\n");
For these skip cases, we should probably do a test access.
if (ksm_stop_and_unmerge() < 0)
ksft_exit_skip("accessing \"/sys/kernel/mm/ksm/run\\") failed\n");
if (ksm_get_full_scans() < 0)
ksft_exit_skip("accessing \"/sys/kernel/mm/ksm/full_scans\") failed\n");
So we later now that the files actually do exist and can be opened+written.
> pagemap_fd = open("/proc/self/pagemap", O_RDONLY);> if (pagemap_fd < 0)
> ksft_exit_skip("open(\"/proc/self/pagemap\") failed\n");
> - proc_self_ksm_stat_fd = open("/proc/self/ksm_stat", O_RDONLY);
> - proc_self_ksm_merging_pages_fd = open("/proc/self/ksm_merging_pages",
> - O_RDONLY);
> - ksm_use_zero_pages_fd = open("/sys/kernel/mm/ksm/use_zero_pages", O_RDWR);
> }
>
> int main(int argc, char **argv)
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/vm_util.c b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/vm_util.c
> index 9dafa7669ef9..14973d957c9a 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/vm_util.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/vm_util.c
> @@ -555,3 +555,114 @@ bool detect_huge_zeropage(void)
> close(fd);
> return enabled;
> }
> +
> +long ksm_get_self_zero_pages()
For all these functions without parameters:
(void)
> +{
> + int proc_self_ksm_stat_fd;
> + char buf[200];
> + char *substr_ksm_zero;
> + size_t value_pos;
> + ssize_t read_size;
> + unsigned long my_ksm_zero_pages;
> +
> + proc_self_ksm_stat_fd = open("/proc/self/ksm_stat", O_RDONLY);
> + if (proc_self_ksm_stat_fd < 0)
> + return 0;
> +
> + read_size = pread(proc_self_ksm_stat_fd, buf, sizeof(buf) - 1, 0);
> + close(proc_self_ksm_stat_fd);
> + if (read_size < 0)
> + return -errno;
> +
> + buf[read_size] = 0;
> +
> + substr_ksm_zero = strstr(buf, "ksm_zero_pages");
> + if (!substr_ksm_zero)
> + return 0;
> +
> + value_pos = strcspn(substr_ksm_zero, "0123456789");
> + my_ksm_zero_pages = strtol(substr_ksm_zero + value_pos, NULL, 10);
> +
> + return my_ksm_zero_pages;
> +}
> +
> +long ksm_get_self_merging_pages()
> +{
> + int proc_self_ksm_merging_pages_fd;
> + char buf[10];
> + ssize_t ret;
> +
> + proc_self_ksm_merging_pages_fd = open("/proc/self/ksm_merging_pages",
> + O_RDONLY);
> + if (proc_self_ksm_merging_pages_fd < 0)
> + return proc_self_ksm_merging_pages_fd;
> +
> + ret = pread(proc_self_ksm_merging_pages_fd, buf, sizeof(buf) - 1, 0);
> + close(proc_self_ksm_merging_pages_fd);
> + if (ret <= 0)
> + return -errno;
> + buf[ret] = 0;
> +
> + return strtol(buf, NULL, 10);
> +}
> +
> +long ksm_get_full_scans()
> +{
> + int ksm_full_scans_fd;
> + char buf[10];
> + ssize_t ret;
> +
> + ksm_full_scans_fd = open("/sys/kernel/mm/ksm/full_scans", O_RDONLY);
> + if (ksm_full_scans_fd < 0)
> + return ksm_full_scans_fd;
> +
> + ret = pread(ksm_full_scans_fd, buf, sizeof(buf) - 1, 0);
> + close(ksm_full_scans_fd);
> + if (ret <= 0)
> + return -errno;
> + buf[ret] = 0;
> +
> + return strtol(buf, NULL, 10);
> +}
> +
> +int ksm_use_zero_pages()
> +{
> + int ksm_use_zero_pages_fd;
> + ssize_t ret;
> +
> + ksm_use_zero_pages_fd = open("/sys/kernel/mm/ksm/use_zero_pages", O_RDWR);
> + if (ksm_use_zero_pages_fd < 0)
> + return -1;
For all these functions, we should not require the caller to lookup errno but
instead return it.
return -errno;
> +
> + ret = write(ksm_use_zero_pages_fd, "1", 1);
> + close(ksm_use_zero_pages_fd);
> + return ret == 1 ? 0 : ret;
return ret == 1 ? 0 : -errno;
> +}
> +
> +int ksm_start_and_merge()
> +{
> + int ksm_fd;
> + ssize_t ret;
> +
> + ksm_fd = open("/sys/kernel/mm/ksm/run", O_RDWR);
> + if (ksm_fd < 0)
> + return -1;
Same comments regarding errno.
> +
> + ret = write(ksm_fd, "1", 1);
> + close(ksm_fd);
> + return ret == 1 ? 0 : ret;
double space
> +}
> +
> +int ksm_stop_and_unmerge()
> +{
> + int ksm_fd;
> + ssize_t ret;
> +
> + ksm_fd = open("/sys/kernel/mm/ksm/run", O_RDWR);
> + if (ksm_fd < 0)
> + return -1;
> +
> + ret = write(ksm_fd, "2", 1);
> + close(ksm_fd);
> + return ret == 1 ? 0 : ret;
double space
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-16 9:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-16 8:27 [PATCH 0/3] selftests/mm: assert rmap behave as expected Wei Yang
2025-07-16 8:27 ` [PATCH 1/3] selftests/mm: check a valid fd with negative value Wei Yang
2025-07-16 8:52 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-07-17 1:18 ` Wei Yang
2025-07-17 8:27 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-07-16 8:27 ` [PATCH 2/3] selftests/mm: put general ksm operation into vm_util Wei Yang
2025-07-16 9:20 ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2025-07-17 2:45 ` Wei Yang
2025-07-17 3:30 ` Wei Yang
2025-07-17 11:57 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-07-17 11:56 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-07-16 8:27 ` [PATCH 3/3] selftests/mm: assert rmap behave as expected Wei Yang
2025-07-16 13:34 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-07-17 3:17 ` Wei Yang
2025-07-25 2:16 ` Wei Yang
2025-07-25 13:34 ` David Hildenbrand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5cadce02-cd80-4aa2-a078-6335beeb8a92@redhat.com \
--to=david@redhat.com \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=harry.yoo@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=richard.weiyang@gmail.com \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox