linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: rppt@kernel.org, ying.huang@intel.com,
	mgorman@techsingularity.net, vbabka@suse.cz, mhocko@suse.com,
	david@redhat.com, baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v4] mm/page_alloc: add some comments to explain the possible hole in __pageblock_pfn_to_page()
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2023 20:44:53 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5c26368865e79c743a453dea48d30670b19d2e4f.1682425534.git.baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <98fa0a22-77d1-cdb3-1ce2-48a00c3ed5a9@linux.alibaba.com>

Now the __pageblock_pfn_to_page() is used by set_zone_contiguous(), which
checks whether the given zone contains holes, and uses pfn_to_online_page()
to validate if the start pfn is online and valid, as well as using pfn_valid()
to validate the end pfn.

However, the __pageblock_pfn_to_page() function may return non-NULL even
if the end pfn of a pageblock is in a memory hole in some situations. For
example, if the pageblock order is MAX_ORDER, which will fall into 2
sub-sections, and the end pfn of the pageblock may be hole even though
the start pfn is online and valid.

See below memory layout as an example and suppose the pageblock order
is MAX_ORDER.

[    0.000000] Zone ranges:
[    0.000000]   DMA      [mem 0x0000000040000000-0x00000000ffffffff]
[    0.000000]   DMA32    empty
[    0.000000]   Normal   [mem 0x0000000100000000-0x0000001fa7ffffff]
[    0.000000] Movable zone start for each node
[    0.000000] Early memory node ranges
[    0.000000]   node   0: [mem 0x0000000040000000-0x0000001fa3c7ffff]
[    0.000000]   node   0: [mem 0x0000001fa3c80000-0x0000001fa3ffffff]
[    0.000000]   node   0: [mem 0x0000001fa4000000-0x0000001fa402ffff]
[    0.000000]   node   0: [mem 0x0000001fa4030000-0x0000001fa40effff]
[    0.000000]   node   0: [mem 0x0000001fa40f0000-0x0000001fa73cffff]
[    0.000000]   node   0: [mem 0x0000001fa73d0000-0x0000001fa745ffff]
[    0.000000]   node   0: [mem 0x0000001fa7460000-0x0000001fa746ffff]
[    0.000000]   node   0: [mem 0x0000001fa7470000-0x0000001fa758ffff]
[    0.000000]   node   0: [mem 0x0000001fa7590000-0x0000001fa7dfffff]

Focus on the last memory range, and there is a hole for the range [mem
0x0000001fa7590000-0x0000001fa7dfffff]. That means the last pageblock
will contain the range from 0x1fa7c00000 to 0x1fa7ffffff, since the
pageblock must be 4M aligned. And in this pageblock, these pfns will
fall into 2 sub-section (the sub-section size is 2M aligned).

So, the 1st sub-section (indicates pfn range: 0x1fa7c00000 -
0x1fa7dfffff ) in this pageblock is valid by calling subsection_map_init()
in free_area_init(), but the 2nd sub-section (indicates pfn range:
0x1fa7e00000 - 0x1fa7ffffff ) in this pageblock is not valid.

This did not break anything until now, but the zone continuous is fragile
in this possible scenario. So as previous discussion[1], it is better to
add some comments to explain this possible issue in case there are some
future pfn walkers that rely on this.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/87r0sdsmr6.fsf@yhuang6-desk2.ccr.corp.intel.com/

Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
---
Changes from v3:
 - Update the comments to make it clear.
 - Add acked tag from Michal.
Changes from v2:
 - Update the commit log and comments per Michal, thanks.
Changes from v1:
 - Update the comments per Ying and Mike, thanks.
---
 mm/page_alloc.c | 9 +++++++++
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)

diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
index 6457b64fe562..af9c995d3c1e 100644
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -1502,6 +1502,15 @@ void __free_pages_core(struct page *page, unsigned int order)
  * interleaving within a single pageblock. It is therefore sufficient to check
  * the first and last page of a pageblock and avoid checking each individual
  * page in a pageblock.
+ *
+ * Note: the function may return non-NULL struct page even for a page block
+ * which contains a memory hole (i.e. there is no physical memory for a subset
+ * of the pfn range). For example, if the pageblock order is MAX_ORDER, which
+ * will fall into 2 sub-sections, and the end pfn of the pageblock may be hole
+ * even though the start pfn is online and valid. This should be safe most of
+ * the time because struct pages are still initialized via init_unavailable_range()
+ * and pfn walkers shouldn't touch any physical memory range for which they do
+ * not recognize any specific metadata in struct pages.
  */
 struct page *__pageblock_pfn_to_page(unsigned long start_pfn,
 				     unsigned long end_pfn, struct zone *zone)
-- 
2.27.0



  reply	other threads:[~2023-04-25 12:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-04-24 13:45 [PATCH v3 1/2] mm/page_alloc: drop the unnecessary pfn_valid() for start pfn Baolin Wang
2023-04-24 13:45 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] mm/page_alloc: add some comments to explain the possible hole in __pageblock_pfn_to_page() Baolin Wang
2023-04-24 14:47   ` Michal Hocko
2023-04-25  0:22   ` Huang, Ying
2023-04-25  1:27     ` Baolin Wang
2023-04-25  2:30       ` Huang, Ying
2023-04-25  9:05       ` Michal Hocko
2023-04-25 12:29         ` Baolin Wang
2023-04-25 12:44           ` Baolin Wang [this message]
2023-04-26  1:23             ` [PATCH v4] " Huang, Ying

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5c26368865e79c743a453dea48d30670b19d2e4f.1682425534.git.baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --to=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox