From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f70.google.com (mail-wm0-f70.google.com [74.125.82.70]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 931046B0006 for ; Wed, 11 Apr 2018 04:41:40 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-wm0-f70.google.com with SMTP id p18so743893wmh.2 for ; Wed, 11 Apr 2018 01:41:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com. [148.163.158.5]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l35si1030443edl.450.2018.04.11.01.41.39 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 11 Apr 2018 01:41:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098420.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w3B8d7sd040289 for ; Wed, 11 Apr 2018 04:41:38 -0400 Received: from e06smtp12.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp12.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.108]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2h9cxgnnsr-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA256 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 11 Apr 2018 04:41:37 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp12.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Wed, 11 Apr 2018 09:41:35 +0100 Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] mm: remove odd HAVE_PTE_SPECIAL References: <1523433816-14460-1-git-send-email-ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1523433816-14460-3-git-send-email-ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20180411083315.GA23400@dhcp22.suse.cz> From: Laurent Dufour Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2018 10:41:23 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180411083315.GA23400@dhcp22.suse.cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <5bd1bb46-8f71-e6db-7fb7-43d023a37f58@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Michal Hocko Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, Jerome Glisse , aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au, benh@kernel.crashing.org, paulus@samba.org, Jonathan Corbet , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Yoshinori Sato , Rich Felker , "David S . Miller" , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Vineet Gupta , Palmer Dabbelt , Albert Ou , Martin Schwidefsky , Heiko Carstens , David Rientjes , Robin Murphy On 11/04/2018 10:33, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Wed 11-04-18 10:03:36, Laurent Dufour wrote: >> @@ -881,7 +876,8 @@ struct page *_vm_normal_page(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr, >> >> if (is_zero_pfn(pfn)) >> return NULL; >> -check_pfn: >> + >> +check_pfn: __maybe_unused >> if (unlikely(pfn > highest_memmap_pfn)) { >> print_bad_pte(vma, addr, pte, NULL); >> return NULL; >> @@ -891,7 +887,7 @@ struct page *_vm_normal_page(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr, >> * NOTE! We still have PageReserved() pages in the page tables. >> * eg. VDSO mappings can cause them to exist. >> */ >> -out: >> +out: __maybe_unused >> return pfn_to_page(pfn); > > Why do we need this ugliness all of the sudden? Indeed the compiler doesn't complaint but in theory it should since these labels are not used depending on CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_PTE_SPECIAL.