From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: Usama Arif <usamaarif642@gmail.com>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: hannes@cmpxchg.org, riel@surriel.com, shakeel.butt@linux.dev,
roman.gushchin@linux.dev, yuzhao@google.com, baohua@kernel.org,
ryan.roberts@arm.com, rppt@kernel.org, willy@infradead.org,
cerasuolodomenico@gmail.com, corbet@lwn.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] mm: split underutilized THPs
Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2024 17:55:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5adb120e-5408-43a6-b418-33dc17c086f0@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240807134732.3292797-5-usamaarif642@gmail.com>
On 07.08.24 15:46, Usama Arif wrote:
> This is an attempt to mitigate the issue of running out of memory when THP
> is always enabled. During runtime whenever a THP is being faulted in
> (__do_huge_pmd_anonymous_page) or collapsed by khugepaged
> (collapse_huge_page), the THP is added to _deferred_list. Whenever memory
> reclaim happens in linux, the kernel runs the deferred_split
> shrinker which goes through the _deferred_list.
>
> If the folio was partially mapped, the shrinker attempts to split it.
> A new boolean is added to be able to distinguish between partially
> mapped folios and others in the deferred_list at split time in
> deferred_split_scan. Its needed as __folio_remove_rmap decrements
> the folio mapcount elements, hence it won't be possible to distinguish
> between partially mapped folios and others in deferred_split_scan
> without the boolean.
Just so I get this right: Are you saying that we might now add fully
mapped folios to the deferred split queue and that's what you want to
distinguish?
If that's the case, then could we use a bit in folio->_flags_1 instead?
Further, I think you forgot to update at least one instance if a
list_empty(&folio->_deferred_list) check where we want to detect
"partially mapped". Please go over all and see what needs adjustments.
I would actually suggest to split decoupling of "_deferred_list" and
"partially mapped" into a separate preparation patch.
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-08 15:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20240807134732.3292797-1-usamaarif642@gmail.com>
[not found] ` <20240807134732.3292797-3-usamaarif642@gmail.com>
[not found] ` <20240807200241.GB1828817@cmpxchg.org>
2024-08-08 15:53 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] mm: remap unused subpages to shared zeropage when splitting isolated thp Usama Arif
[not found] ` <20240807134732.3292797-5-usamaarif642@gmail.com>
2024-08-08 15:55 ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2024-08-09 10:31 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] mm: split underutilized THPs Usama Arif
2024-08-09 13:21 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-08-09 14:25 ` Usama Arif
[not found] ` <20240807134732.3292797-2-usamaarif642@gmail.com>
2024-08-08 15:56 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] mm: free zapped tail pages when splitting isolated thp David Hildenbrand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5adb120e-5408-43a6-b418-33dc17c086f0@redhat.com \
--to=david@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=baohua@kernel.org \
--cc=cerasuolodomenico@gmail.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=usamaarif642@gmail.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=yuzhao@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox