From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>, Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>, Colin Cross <ccross@google.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] mm, madvise: simplify anon_name handling
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2025 19:01:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5a38449e-f50d-4b3d-a0cc-dac551f691e0@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250624-anon_name_cleanup-v2-1-600075462a11@suse.cz>
On 6/24/25 15:03, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> Since the introduction in 9a10064f5625 ("mm: add a field to store names
> for private anonymous memory") the code to set anon_name on a vma has
> been using madvise_update_vma() to call replace_anon_vma_name(). Since
> the former is called also by a number of other madvise behaviours that
> do not set a new anon_name, they have been passing the existing
> anon_name of the vma to make replace_vma_anon_name() a no-op.
>
> This is rather wasteful as it needs anon_vma_name_eq() to determine the
> no-op situations, and checks for when replace_vma_anon_name() is allowed
> (the vma is anon/shmem) duplicate the checks already done earlier in
> madvise_vma_behavior(). It has also lead to commit 942341dcc574 ("mm:
> fix use-after-free when anon vma name is used after vma is freed")
> adding anon_name refcount get/put operations exactly to the cases that
> actually do not change anon_name - just so the replace_vma_anon_name()
> can keep safely determining it has nothing to do.
>
> The recent madvise cleanups made this suboptimal handling very obvious,
> but happily also allow for an easy fix. madvise_update_vma() now has the
> complete information whether it's been called to set a new anon_name, so
> stop passing it the existing vma's name and doing the refcount get/put
> in its only caller madvise_vma_behavior().
>
> In madvise_update_vma() itself, limit calling of replace_anon_vma_name()
> only to cases where we are setting a new name, otherwise we know it's a
> no-op. We can rely solely on the __MADV_SET_ANON_VMA_NAME behaviour and
> can remove the duplicate checks for vma being anon/shmem that were done
> already in madvise_vma_behavior().
>
> Additionally, by using vma_modify_flags() when not modifying the
> anon_name, avoid explicitly passing the existing vma's anon_name and
> storing a pointer to it in struct madv_behavior or a local variable.
> This prevents the danger of accessing a freed anon_name after vma
> merging, previously fixed by commit 942341dcc574.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
With fixed up function names as pointed out by Suren:
Since the introduction in 9a10064f5625 ("mm: add a field to store names
for private anonymous memory") the code to set anon_name on a vma has
been using madvise_update_vma() to call replace_anon_vma_name(). Since
the former is called also by a number of other madvise behaviours that
do not set a new anon_name, they have been passing the existing
anon_name of the vma to make replace_anon_vma_name() a no-op.
This is rather wasteful as it needs anon_vma_name_eq() to determine the
no-op situations, and checks for when replace_anon_vma_name() is allowed
(the vma is anon/shmem) duplicate the checks already done earlier in
madvise_vma_behavior(). It has also lead to commit 942341dcc574 ("mm:
fix use-after-free when anon vma name is used after vma is freed")
adding anon_name refcount get/put operations exactly to the cases that
actually do not change anon_name - just so the replace_anon_vma_name()
can keep safely determining it has nothing to do.
The recent madvise cleanups made this suboptimal handling very obvious,
but happily also allow for an easy fix. madvise_update_vma() now has the
complete information whether it's been called to set a new anon_name, so
stop passing it the existing vma's name and doing the refcount get/put
in its only caller madvise_vma_behavior().
In madvise_update_vma() itself, limit calling of replace_anon_vma_name()
only to cases where we are setting a new name, otherwise we know it's a
no-op. We can rely solely on the __MADV_SET_ANON_VMA_NAME behaviour and
can remove the duplicate checks for vma being anon/shmem that were done
already in madvise_vma_behavior().
Additionally, by using vma_modify_flags() when not modifying the
anon_name, avoid explicitly passing the existing vma's anon_name and
storing a pointer to it in struct madv_behavior or a local variable.
This prevents the danger of accessing a freed anon_name after vma
merging, previously fixed by commit 942341dcc574.
Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-24 17:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-24 13:03 [PATCH v2 0/4] madvise anon_name cleanups Vlastimil Babka
2025-06-24 13:03 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] mm, madvise: simplify anon_name handling Vlastimil Babka
2025-06-24 13:58 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-24 14:28 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2025-06-24 16:41 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-06-24 16:38 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-06-24 15:26 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-06-24 16:42 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-06-24 17:01 ` Vlastimil Babka [this message]
2025-06-24 13:03 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] mm, madvise: extract mm code from prctl_set_vma() to mm/madvise.c Vlastimil Babka
2025-06-24 14:04 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-24 14:31 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2025-06-24 15:28 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-06-24 13:03 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] mm, madvise: move madvise_set_anon_name() down the file Vlastimil Babka
2025-06-24 14:05 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-24 14:33 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2025-06-24 16:46 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-06-24 15:36 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-06-24 17:02 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-06-24 13:03 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] mm, madvise: use standard madvise locking in madvise_set_anon_name() Vlastimil Babka
2025-06-24 14:06 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-24 14:35 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2025-06-24 15:45 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-06-24 16:48 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-06-24 17:03 ` Vlastimil Babka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5a38449e-f50d-4b3d-a0cc-dac551f691e0@suse.cz \
--to=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ccross@google.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox