linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
To: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: remove migration for HugePage in isolate_single_pageblock()
Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2024 19:58:07 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5D57871E-0360-40F5-A3E3-B3DAD0B2F5BF@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a2b34157-1d77-4ea5-a2d1-274a78046839@huawei.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2968 bytes --]

On 17 Aug 2024, at 2:13, Kefeng Wang wrote:

> On 2024/8/17 3:45, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> On 16.08.24 13:30, Kefeng Wang wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2024/8/16 18:11, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>>>> On 16.08.24 06:06, Kefeng Wang wrote:
>>>>> The gigantic page size may larger than memory block size, so memory
>>>>> offline always fails in this case after commit b2c9e2fbba32 ("mm: make
>>>>> alloc_contig_range work at pageblock granularity"),
>>>>>
>>>>> offline_pages
>>>>>     start_isolate_page_range
>>>>>       start_isolate_page_range(isolate_before=true)
>>>>>         isolate [isolate_start, isolate_start + pageblock_nr_pages)
>>>>>       start_isolate_page_range(isolate_before=false)
>>>>>         isolate [isolate_end - pageblock_nr_pages, isolate_end) pageblock
>>>>>              __alloc_contig_migrate_range
>>>>>             isolate_migratepages_range
>>>>>               isolate_migratepages_block
>>>>>                 isolate_or_dissolve_huge_page
>>>>>                   if (hstate_is_gigantic(h))
>>>>>                       return -ENOMEM;
>>>>>
>>>>> In fact, we don't need to migrate page in page range isolation, for
>>>>> memory offline path, there is do_migrate_range() to move the pages.
>>>>> For contig allocation, there is another __alloc_contig_migrate_range()
>>>>> after isolation to migrate the pages. So fix issue by skipping the
>>>>> __alloc_contig_migrate_range() in isolate_single_pageblock().
>
> ...
>
>>
>> Please distill some of that in the patch description. Right now you only talk about memory offlining and don't cover why alloc_contig_range() is fine as well with this change.
>
> Borrowing some word from Zi,
>
>
> PageHuge(gigantic) can bigger than a pageblock, the gigantic PageHuge is freed as order-0. This means MIGRATE_ISOLATE pageblocks will get to the right free list after __alloc_contig_migrate_range(), the one after
> start_isolate_page_range() for alloc_contig_range(), this is same as in
> memory offline, it has own path to isolate/migrate used page and dissolve the free hugepages, so the migration code in isolate_single_pageblock() is not needed, let's cleanup it and which also fix the above the issue.
>
> Please correct me or help to write better description, thanks.

How about?

Gigantic PageHuge is bigger than a pageblock, but since it is freed as order-0 pages,
its pageblocks after being freed will get to the right free list. There is no need
to have special handling code for them in start_isolate_page_range(). For both
alloc_contig_range() and memory offline cases, the migration code after
start_isolate_page_range() will be able to migrate gigantic PageHuge when possible.
Let's clean up start_isolate_page_range() and fix the aforementioned memory offline
failure issue all together.


--
Best Regards,
Yan, Zi

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 854 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2024-08-17 23:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-08-16  4:06 Kefeng Wang
2024-08-16  4:58 ` Andrew Morton
2024-08-16  6:10   ` Kefeng Wang
2024-08-16 10:11 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-08-16 11:30   ` Kefeng Wang
2024-08-16 15:06     ` Zi Yan
2024-08-16 20:12       ` David Hildenbrand
2024-08-16 21:16         ` Yu Zhao
2024-08-16 22:09         ` Zi Yan
2024-08-16 19:45     ` David Hildenbrand
2024-08-17  6:13       ` Kefeng Wang
2024-08-17 23:58         ` Zi Yan [this message]
2024-08-19  2:42           ` Kefeng Wang
2024-08-21  1:41           ` Andrew Morton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5D57871E-0360-40F5-A3E3-B3DAD0B2F5BF@nvidia.com \
    --to=ziy@nvidia.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=osalvador@suse.de \
    --cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox