linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>, Linux MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/spase: never partially remove memmap for early section
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2020 06:59:11 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5CA8ECA1-2360-4AAA-954F-931404EFEB2B@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200625223952.GA17926@L-31X9LVDL-1304.local>



> Am 26.06.2020 um 00:40 schrieb Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@linux.alibaba.com>:
> 
> On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 07:53:37AM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>>> Am 25.06.2020 um 01:47 schrieb Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>:
>>> 
>>> On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 3:44 PM Wei Yang
>>> <richard.weiyang@linux.alibaba.com> wrote:
>>> [..]
>>>>> So, you are right that there is a mismatch here, but I think the
>>>>> comprehensive fix is to allow early sections to be partially
>>>>> depopulated/repopulated rather than have section_activate() and
>>>>> section_deacticate() special case early sections. The special casing
>>>>> is problematic in retrospect as section_deactivate() can't be
>>>>> maintained without understand special rules in section_activate().
>>>> 
>>>> Hmm... This means we need to adjust pfn_valid() too, which always return true
>>>> for early sections.
>>> 
>>> Right, rather than carry workarounds in 3 locations, and the bug that
>>> has resulted from then getting out of sync, just teach early section
>>> mapping to allow for the subsection populate/depopulate.
>>> 
>> 
>> I prefer the easy fix first - IOW what we Here here. Especially, pfn_to_online_page() will need changes as well.
>> 
> 
> Hi, David,
> 
> Which part of pfn_to_online_page() needs to be changed? pfn_valid_within()
> would call pfn_valid() to check the pfn first. This looks enough for me.

Not for all configurations. For some (e.g., x86 iirc) it‘s just a nop.



  reply	other threads:[~2020-06-26  4:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-23  9:42 Wei Yang
2020-06-23 12:44 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-06-23 13:02   ` Wei Yang
2020-06-23 13:16     ` David Hildenbrand
2020-06-23 15:18 ` Michal Hocko
2020-06-23 21:48   ` Wei Yang
2020-06-24  6:13   ` Wei Yang
2020-06-24 16:10     ` Dan Williams
2020-06-24 22:05       ` Wei Yang
2020-06-24 22:20         ` Dan Williams
2020-06-24 22:44           ` Wei Yang
2020-06-24 23:47             ` Dan Williams
2020-06-25  5:53               ` David Hildenbrand
2020-06-25 19:46                 ` Dan Williams
2020-06-25 22:29                   ` Wei Yang
2020-06-29  8:34                   ` Wei Yang
2020-06-29 22:13                     ` Dan Williams
2020-06-29 22:58                       ` Wei Yang
2020-06-30  7:16                         ` David Hildenbrand
2020-06-25 22:39                 ` Wei Yang
2020-06-26  4:59                   ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2020-06-24  7:48   ` David Hildenbrand
2020-06-24  8:04     ` David Hildenbrand
2020-06-24  8:13     ` Wei Yang
2020-06-24  8:41       ` David Hildenbrand
2020-06-24  8:50         ` Michal Hocko
2020-06-24 22:27         ` Wei Yang
2020-06-24  0:21 ` Dan Williams
2020-06-24  1:11   ` Wei Yang
2020-06-24  1:47   ` Baoquan He
2020-06-24  2:14     ` Baoquan He
2020-06-24  3:46     ` Wei Yang
2020-06-24  3:52       ` Baoquan He
2020-06-24  3:56         ` Wei Yang
2020-06-24  8:51           ` David Hildenbrand
2020-06-24 22:08             ` Wei Yang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5CA8ECA1-2360-4AAA-954F-931404EFEB2B@redhat.com \
    --to=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bhe@redhat.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=osalvador@suse.de \
    --cc=richard.weiyang@linux.alibaba.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox