From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 187C4C388F9 for ; Thu, 5 Nov 2020 05:08:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6749822243 for ; Thu, 5 Nov 2020 05:08:01 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 6749822243 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.alibaba.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 8819C6B0099; Thu, 5 Nov 2020 00:08:00 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 8333E6B009A; Thu, 5 Nov 2020 00:08:00 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 6D1F06B009B; Thu, 5 Nov 2020 00:08:00 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0083.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.83]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D1236B0099 for ; Thu, 5 Nov 2020 00:08:00 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin24.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay04.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB0571EE6 for ; Thu, 5 Nov 2020 05:07:59 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 77449182678.24.wire06_3208faf272c7 Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (10.5.16.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.16.251]) by smtpin24.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8994A1A4A0 for ; Thu, 5 Nov 2020 05:07:59 +0000 (UTC) X-HE-Tag: wire06_3208faf272c7 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 2503 Received: from out30-44.freemail.mail.aliyun.com (out30-44.freemail.mail.aliyun.com [115.124.30.44]) by imf20.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Thu, 5 Nov 2020 05:07:58 +0000 (UTC) X-Alimail-AntiSpam:AC=PASS;BC=-1|-1;BR=01201311R181e4;CH=green;DM=||false|;DS=||;FP=0|-1|-1|-1|0|-1|-1|-1;HT=e01e04400;MF=alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com;NM=1;PH=DS;RN=21;SR=0;TI=SMTPD_---0UEHX1wb_1604552873; Received: from IT-FVFX43SYHV2H.local(mailfrom:alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com fp:SMTPD_---0UEHX1wb_1604552873) by smtp.aliyun-inc.com(127.0.0.1); Thu, 05 Nov 2020 13:07:53 +0800 Subject: Re: [PATCH v20 00/20] per memcg lru lock To: Johannes Weiner Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, mgorman@techsingularity.net, tj@kernel.org, hughd@google.com, khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru, daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com, willy@infradead.org, lkp@intel.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, shakeelb@google.com, iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com, richard.weiyang@gmail.com, kirill@shutemov.name, alexander.duyck@gmail.com, rong.a.chen@intel.com, mhocko@suse.com, vdavydov.dev@gmail.com, shy828301@gmail.com References: <1603968305-8026-1-git-send-email-alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com> <811216d4-4972-4721-d6b9-1028c02f4290@linux.alibaba.com> <20201104165935.GA744831@cmpxchg.org> From: Alex Shi Message-ID: <59f37649-0530-e2d8-c2e3-ecb70871ffb4@linux.alibaba.com> Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2020 13:07:48 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.12.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20201104165935.GA744831@cmpxchg.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=gbk Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.002758, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: =D4=DA 2020/11/5 =C9=CF=CE=E712:59, Johannes Weiner =D0=B4=B5=C0: > On Wed, Nov 04, 2020 at 07:55:39PM +0800, Alex Shi wrote: >> @@ -1380,6 +1383,14 @@ struct lruvec *mem_cgroup_page_lruvec(struct pa= ge *page, struct pglist_data *pgd >> return lruvec; >> } >> >> +/** >> + * lock_page_lruvec - return lruvec for the locked page. >=20 > I would say "lock and return the lruvec for a given page" >=20 >> + * @page: the page >> + * >> + * This series functions should be used in either conditions: >> + * PageLRU is cleared or unset >> + * or, page->_refcount is zero >=20 > or page is locked >=20 > The other changes look good to me, thanks! >=20 Thanks a lot for both comments! I will pick them and sent out in v21. Thanks! Alex