linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
To: Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
	Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
	Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com>,
	Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
	Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@gmail.com>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kasan-dev@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 3/3] mm/slub: extend redzone check to extra allocated kmalloc space than requested
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2022 09:12:19 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <59a0b85a-9001-8c7d-8b98-fd8a87e636fa@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y23vtK4tuBogff+m@feng-clx>

On 11/11/22 07:46, Feng Tang wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2022 at 04:48:35PM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
>> On 10/21/22 05:24, Feng Tang wrote:
>> > kmalloc will round up the request size to a fixed size (mostly power
>> > of 2), so there could be a extra space than what is requested, whose
>> > size is the actual buffer size minus original request size.
>> > 
>> > To better detect out of bound access or abuse of this space, add
>> > redzone sanity check for it.
>> > 
>> > In current kernel, some kmalloc user already knows the existence of
>> > the space and utilizes it after calling 'ksize()' to know the real
>> > size of the allocated buffer. So we skip the sanity check for objects
>> > which have been called with ksize(), as treating them as legitimate
>> > users.
>> 
>> Hm so once Kees's effort is finished and all ksize() users behave correctly,
>> we can drop all that skip_orig_size_check() code, right?
> 
> Yes, will update the commit log.
> 
>> > In some cases, the free pointer could be saved inside the latter
>> > part of object data area, which may overlap the redzone part(for
>> > small sizes of kmalloc objects). As suggested by Hyeonggon Yoo,
>> > force the free pointer to be in meta data area when kmalloc redzone
>> > debug is enabled, to make all kmalloc objects covered by redzone
>> > check.
>> > 
>> > Suggested-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
>> > Signed-off-by: Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com>
>> > Acked-by: Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com>
>> 
>> Looks fine, but a suggestion below:
>> 
> [...]
>> > @@ -966,13 +982,27 @@ static __printf(3, 4) void slab_err(struct kmem_cache *s, struct slab *slab,
>> >  static void init_object(struct kmem_cache *s, void *object, u8 val)
>> >  {
>> >  	u8 *p = kasan_reset_tag(object);
>> > +	unsigned int orig_size = s->object_size;
>> >  
>> > -	if (s->flags & SLAB_RED_ZONE)
>> > +	if (s->flags & SLAB_RED_ZONE) {
>> >  		memset(p - s->red_left_pad, val, s->red_left_pad);
>> >  
>> > +		if (slub_debug_orig_size(s) && val == SLUB_RED_ACTIVE) {
>> > +			orig_size = get_orig_size(s, object);
>> > +
>> > +			/*
>> > +			 * Redzone the extra allocated space by kmalloc
>> > +			 * than requested.
>> > +			 */
>> > +			if (orig_size < s->object_size)
>> > +				memset(p + orig_size, val,
>> > +				       s->object_size - orig_size);
>> 
>> Wondering if we can remove this if - memset and instead below:
>> 
>> > +		}
>> > +	}
>> > +
>> >  	if (s->flags & __OBJECT_POISON) {
>> > -		memset(p, POISON_FREE, s->object_size - 1);
>> > -		p[s->object_size - 1] = POISON_END;
>> > +		memset(p, POISON_FREE, orig_size - 1);
>> > +		p[orig_size - 1] = POISON_END;
>> >  	}
>> >  
>> >  	if (s->flags & SLAB_RED_ZONE)
>> 
>> This continues by:
>>     memset(p + s->object_size, val, s->inuse - s->object_size);
>> Instead we could do this, no?
>>     memset(p + orig_size, val, s->inuse - orig_size);
> 
> Yep, the code is much simpler and cleaner! thanks
>  
> I also change the name from 'orig_size' to 'poison_size', as below:
> 
> Thanks,
> Feng

Thanks! Now merged all to slab/for-6.2/kmalloc_redzone and for-next



  reply	other threads:[~2022-11-11  8:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-10-21  3:24 [PATCH v7 0/3] mm/slub: extend redzone check for kmalloc objects Feng Tang
2022-10-21  3:24 ` [PATCH v7 1/3] mm/slub: only zero requested size of buffer for kzalloc when debug enabled Feng Tang
2022-10-24 14:00   ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2022-10-27 19:27   ` Andrey Konovalov
2022-11-09 14:28   ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-11-10  3:20     ` Feng Tang
2022-11-10 12:57       ` Feng Tang
2022-11-10 15:44         ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-11-11  6:19           ` Feng Tang
2022-10-21  3:24 ` [PATCH v7 2/3] mm: kasan: Extend kasan_metadata_size() to also cover in-object size Feng Tang
2022-10-27 19:27   ` Andrey Konovalov
2022-10-21  3:24 ` [PATCH v7 3/3] mm/slub: extend redzone check to extra allocated kmalloc space than requested Feng Tang
2022-11-10 15:48   ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-11-11  6:46     ` Feng Tang
2022-11-11  8:12       ` Vlastimil Babka [this message]
2022-11-11  8:16 ` [PATCH v7 0/3] mm/slub: extend redzone check for kmalloc objects Vlastimil Babka
2022-11-11  8:29   ` Feng Tang
2022-11-21  6:38     ` Feng Tang
2022-11-23  9:48       ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-11-28  5:43         ` Feng Tang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=59a0b85a-9001-8c7d-8b98-fd8a87e636fa@suse.cz \
    --to=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=42.hyeyoo@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andreyknvl@gmail.com \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=dvyukov@google.com \
    --cc=feng.tang@intel.com \
    --cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
    --cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=penberg@kernel.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox