linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Jungseok Lee <jungseoklee85@gmail.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	barami97@gmail.com, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] arm64: Implement vmalloc based thread_info allocator
Date: Sun, 24 May 2015 19:49:01 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5992243.NYDGjLH37z@wuerfel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1432483340-23157-1-git-send-email-jungseoklee85@gmail.com>

On Monday 25 May 2015 01:02:20 Jungseok Lee wrote:
> Fork-routine sometimes fails to get a physically contiguous region for
> thread_info on 4KB page system although free memory is enough. That is,
> a physically contiguous region, which is currently 16KB, is not available
> since system memory is fragmented.
> 
> This patch tries to solve the problem as allocating thread_info memory
> from vmalloc space, not 1:1 mapping one. The downside is one additional
> page allocation in case of vmalloc. However, vmalloc space is large enough,
> around 240GB, under a combination of 39-bit VA and 4KB page. Thus, it is
> not a big tradeoff for fork-routine service.

vmalloc has a rather large runtime cost. I'd argue that failing to allocate
thread_info structures means something has gone very wrong.

Can you describe the scenario that leads to fragmentation this bad?

Could the stack size be reduced to 8KB perhaps?

	Arnd

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2015-05-24 17:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-05-24 16:02 Jungseok Lee
2015-05-24 17:49 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2015-05-25 10:01   ` Jungseok Lee
2015-05-25 14:58     ` Minchan Kim
2015-05-26 12:10       ` Jungseok Lee
2015-05-27  4:24         ` Minchan Kim
2015-05-27 16:00           ` Jungseok Lee
2015-05-25 16:47     ` Catalin Marinas
2015-05-25 20:29       ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-05-25 22:36         ` Catalin Marinas
2015-05-26  9:51           ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-05-26 13:02       ` Jungseok Lee
2015-05-25 21:20     ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-05-25 14:40 ` Minchan Kim
2015-05-26 11:29   ` Jungseok Lee
2015-05-27  4:10     ` Minchan Kim
2015-05-27  6:22       ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2015-05-27  7:31         ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-05-27 16:05           ` Jungseok Lee
2015-05-27 16:08       ` Jungseok Lee
2015-05-26  2:52 ` yalin wang
2015-05-26 12:21   ` Jungseok Lee

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5992243.NYDGjLH37z@wuerfel \
    --to=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=barami97@gmail.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=jungseoklee85@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox