From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0785C43334 for ; Fri, 15 Jul 2022 03:29:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 046309401C7; Thu, 14 Jul 2022 23:29:45 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id EEA179401A5; Thu, 14 Jul 2022 23:29:44 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id D8A469401C7; Thu, 14 Jul 2022 23:29:44 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0014.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.14]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C41289401A5 for ; Thu, 14 Jul 2022 23:29:44 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin02.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay13.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A8BB60608 for ; Fri, 15 Jul 2022 03:29:44 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 79687904688.02.B319A7C Received: from szxga02-in.huawei.com (szxga02-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.188]) by imf17.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B537140082 for ; Fri, 15 Jul 2022 03:29:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kwepemi500016.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.56]) by szxga02-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4LkcHK0QjNzkWkK; Fri, 15 Jul 2022 11:27:25 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.174.178.157] (10.174.178.157) by kwepemi500016.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.220) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.24; Fri, 15 Jul 2022 11:29:38 +0800 Message-ID: <58ff7708-e659-2b21-7de6-2dad845fec2f@huawei.com> Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2022 11:29:28 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.10.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] memblock,arm64: Expand the static memblock memory table Content-Language: en-US To: Will Deacon CC: , , , , , , , References: <20220615102742.96450-1-zhouguanghui1@huawei.com> <20220628110301.GA23703@willie-the-truck> From: Zhou Guanghui In-Reply-To: <20220628110301.GA23703@willie-the-truck> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.174.178.157] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems702-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.179) To kwepemi500016.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.220) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; imf17.hostedemail.com; dkim=none; dmarc=pass (policy=quarantine) header.from=huawei.com; spf=pass (imf17.hostedemail.com: domain of zhouguanghui1@huawei.com designates 45.249.212.188 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=zhouguanghui1@huawei.com ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hostedemail.com; s=arc-20220608; t=1657855783; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=UDJUtdDZkxHUpctz4ye/LYzxtILs3nWjpfaF9QwNa1Y=; b=GklyYfNmgKosK3m8DEPi3ajzZ2tbqVcaZT1AaVnxBHR9dPoMlUFsoxm1eEFF5wip9XDgBL BXreW2Chs935gM9VF251f5FZGm33QJ5+p1BrrnQ0prZwYKI3PwXrAzI4geoXOuK2jqqV5L 7/Yo1cARm+51c6+tkTDUTWkYHE0lObQ= ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-20220608; d=hostedemail.com; t=1657855783; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=JRIijisEtkm3Y+CBr04e7kW6U31jTOTukrzPluoum8BWmXhfbstI+Oi0m8RARFVWT+1bFs Bk30OPdu5P8ck40PEry4+u6746v8xS3Y5+Hrizz3h1Rylp5JoZgp/2XUYEM23Rs3dbYnBb Y/pRxayTCVy5mcpHs3IKHG0fzMcZykM= Authentication-Results: imf17.hostedemail.com; dkim=none; dmarc=pass (policy=quarantine) header.from=huawei.com; spf=pass (imf17.hostedemail.com: domain of zhouguanghui1@huawei.com designates 45.249.212.188 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=zhouguanghui1@huawei.com X-Rspamd-Server: rspam06 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: B537140082 X-Rspam-User: X-Stat-Signature: t77ufgjs4h9ckngjjdojg8mip6icik1b X-HE-Tag: 1657855782-977207 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On 2022/6/28 19:03, Will Deacon wrote: > On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 10:27:42AM +0000, Zhou Guanghui wrote: >> In a system(Huawei Ascend ARM64 SoC) using HBM, a multi-bit ECC error >> occurs, and the BIOS will mark the corresponding area (for example, 2 MB) >> as unusable. When the system restarts next time, these areas are not >> reported or reported as EFI_UNUSABLE_MEMORY. Both cases lead to an >> increase in the number of memblocks, whereas EFI_UNUSABLE_MEMORY >> leads to a larger number of memblocks. >> >> For example, if the EFI_UNUSABLE_MEMORY type is reported: >> ... >> memory[0x92] [0x0000200834a00000-0x0000200835bfffff], 0x0000000001200000 bytes on node 7 flags: 0x0 >> memory[0x93] [0x0000200835c00000-0x0000200835dfffff], 0x0000000000200000 bytes on node 7 flags: 0x4 >> memory[0x94] [0x0000200835e00000-0x00002008367fffff], 0x0000000000a00000 bytes on node 7 flags: 0x0 >> memory[0x95] [0x0000200836800000-0x00002008369fffff], 0x0000000000200000 bytes on node 7 flags: 0x4 >> memory[0x96] [0x0000200836a00000-0x0000200837bfffff], 0x0000000001200000 bytes on node 7 flags: 0x0 >> memory[0x97] [0x0000200837c00000-0x0000200837dfffff], 0x0000000000200000 bytes on node 7 flags: 0x4 >> memory[0x98] [0x0000200837e00000-0x000020087fffffff], 0x0000000048200000 bytes on node 7 flags: 0x0 >> memory[0x99] [0x0000200880000000-0x0000200bcfffffff], 0x0000000350000000 bytes on node 6 flags: 0x0 >> memory[0x9a] [0x0000200bd0000000-0x0000200bd01fffff], 0x0000000000200000 bytes on node 6 flags: 0x4 >> memory[0x9b] [0x0000200bd0200000-0x0000200bd07fffff], 0x0000000000600000 bytes on node 6 flags: 0x0 >> memory[0x9c] [0x0000200bd0800000-0x0000200bd09fffff], 0x0000000000200000 bytes on node 6 flags: 0x4 >> memory[0x9d] [0x0000200bd0a00000-0x0000200fcfffffff], 0x00000003ff600000 bytes on node 6 flags: 0x0 >> memory[0x9e] [0x0000200fd0000000-0x0000200fd01fffff], 0x0000000000200000 bytes on node 6 flags: 0x4 >> memory[0x9f] [0x0000200fd0200000-0x0000200fffffffff], 0x000000002fe00000 bytes on node 6 flags: 0x0 >> ... >> >> The EFI memory map is parsed to construct the memblock arrays before >> the memblock arrays can be resized. As the result, memory regions >> beyond INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS are lost. >> >> Add a new macro INIT_MEMBLOCK_MEMORY_REGTIONS to replace > > nit: s/REGTIONS/REGIONS/ > >> INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGTIONS to define the size of the static memblock.memory >> array. >> >> Allow overriding memblock.memory array size with architecture defined >> INIT_MEMBLOCK_MEMORY_REGIONS and make arm64 to set >> INIT_MEMBLOCK_MEMORY_REGIONS to 1024 when CONFIG_EFI is enabled. >> >> Signed-off-by: Zhou Guanghui >> Acked-by: Mike Rapoport >> Tested-by: Darren Hart >> --- >> arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h | 9 +++++++++ >> mm/memblock.c | 14 +++++++++----- >> 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h >> index 0af70d9abede..ce8614fa376a 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h >> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h >> @@ -364,6 +364,15 @@ void dump_mem_limit(void); >> # define INIT_MEMBLOCK_RESERVED_REGIONS (INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS + NR_CPUS + 1) >> #endif >> >> +/* >> + * memory regions which marked with flag MEMBLOCK_NOMAP(for example, the memory >> + * of the EFI_UNUSABLE_MEMORY type) may divide a continuous memory block into >> + * multiple parts. As a result, the number of memory regions is large. >> + */ >> +#ifdef CONFIG_EFI >> +#define INIT_MEMBLOCK_MEMORY_REGIONS (INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS * 8) >> +#endif >> + >> #include >> >> #endif /* __ASM_MEMORY_H */ > > For the arm64 bit: > > Acked-by: Will Deacon > > I'm assuming Andrew will pick this up, but please yell if you'd prefer it > to go via the arm64 tree. Andrew, do you have any suggestions for this patch? > > Will >