Re: [PATCH 1/1] workqueue: use type int instead of bool to index array

[zijun_hu <zijun_hu@zoho.com>]

On 2017/9/7 0:40, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 07, 2017 at 12:04:59AM +0800, zijun_hu wrote:
>> On 2017/9/6 22:33, Tejun Heo wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> On Wed, Sep 06, 2017 at 11:34:14AM +0800, zijun_hu wrote:
>>>> From: zijun_hu <zijun_hu@htc.com>
>>>>
>>>> type bool is used to index three arrays in alloc_and_link_pwqs()
>>>> it doesn't look like conventional.
>>>>
>>>> it is fixed by using type int to index the relevant arrays.
>>>
>>> bool is a uint type which can be either 0 or 1.  I don't see what the
>>> benefit of this patch is.q
>>>
>> bool is NOT a uint type now, it is a new type introduced by gcc, it is
>> rather different with "typedef int bool" historically
> 
> http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n815.htm
> 
>   Because C has existed for so long without a Boolean type, however, the
>   new standard must coexist with the old remedies. Therefore, the type
>   name is taken from the reserved identifier space. To maintain
>   orthogonal promotion rules, the Boolean type is defined as an unsigned
>   integer type capable of representing the values 0 and 1. The more
>   conventional names for the type and its values are then made available
>   only with the inclusion of the <stdbool.h> header. In addition, the
>   header defines a feature test macro to aid in integrating new code
>   with old code that defines its own Boolean type.
> 
in this case, i think type int is more suitable than bool in aspects of
extendibility, program custom and consistency.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>