From: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
To: "Daniel Gomez" <da.gomez@kernel.org>,
"Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, hughd@google.com, willy@infradead.org,
david@redhat.com, wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com, 21cnbao@gmail.com,
ryan.roberts@arm.com, ioworker0@gmail.com, da.gomez@samsung.com,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
regressions@lists.linux.dev, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
Eero Tamminen <eero.t.tamminen@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [REGRESSION] Re: [PATCH v3 3/6] mm: shmem: add large folio support for tmpfs
Date: Fri, 2 May 2025 09:02:46 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <57dc4929-268b-4f3f-a0f8-43d6ec85974f@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cxwpgygobg6wleoeezbowjhmid4mdhptzheqask44ew37h2q24@kryzkecuobbp>
On 2025/4/30 21:24, Daniel Gomez wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 02:20:02PM +0100, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 02:32:39PM +0800, Baolin Wang wrote:
>>> On 2025/4/30 01:44, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Nov 28, 2024 at 03:40:41PM +0800, Baolin Wang wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> This causes a huge regression in Intel iGPU texturing performance.
>>>
>>> Unfortunately, I don't have such platform to test it.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> I haven't had time to look at this in detail, but presumably the
>>>> problem is that we're no longer getting huge pages from our
>>>> private tmpfs mount (done in i915_gemfs_init()).
>>>
>>> IIUC, the i915 driver still limits the maximum write size to PAGE_SIZE
>>> in the shmem_pwrite(),
>>
>> pwrite is just one random way to write to objects, and probably
>> not something that's even used by current Mesa.
>>
>>> which prevents tmpfs from allocating large
>>> folios. As mentioned in the comments below, tmpfs like other file
>>> systems that support large folios, will allow getting a highest order
>>> hint based on the size of the write and fallocate paths, and then will
>>> attempt each allowable huge order.
>>>
>>> Therefore, I think the shmem_pwrite() function should be changed to
>>> remove the limitation that the write size cannot exceed PAGE_SIZE.
>
> To enable mTHP on tmpfs, the necessary knobs must first be enabled in sysfs
> as they are not enabled by default IIRC (only THP, PMD level). Ville, I
> see i915_gemfs the huge=within_size mount option is passed. Can you confirm
> if /sys/kernel/mm/transparent_hugepage/hugepages-*/enabled are also marked as
> 'always' when the regression is found?
The tmpfs mount will not be controlled by
'/sys/kernel/mm/transparent_hugepage/hugepages-*Kb/enabled' (except for
the debugging options 'deny' and 'force').
> Even if these are enabled, the possible difference may be that before, i915 was
> using PMD pages (THP) always and now mTHP will be used, unless the file size is
> as big as the PMD page. I think the always mount option would also try to infer
> the size to actually give a proper order folio according to that size. Baolin,
> is that correct?
Right.
> And Ville, can you confirm if what i915 needs is to enable PMD-size allocations
> always?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-02 1:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-28 7:40 [PATCH v3 0/6] Support large folios " Baolin Wang
2024-11-28 7:40 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] mm: factor out the order calculation into a new helper Baolin Wang
2024-11-28 7:40 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] mm: shmem: change shmem_huge_global_enabled() to return huge order bitmap Baolin Wang
2024-11-28 7:40 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] mm: shmem: add large folio support for tmpfs Baolin Wang
2025-04-29 17:44 ` [REGRESSION] " Ville Syrjälä
2025-04-30 6:32 ` Baolin Wang
2025-04-30 11:20 ` Ville Syrjälä
2025-04-30 13:24 ` Daniel Gomez
2025-05-02 1:02 ` Baolin Wang [this message]
2025-05-02 7:18 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-05-02 13:10 ` Daniel Gomez
2025-05-02 15:31 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-05-06 3:33 ` Baolin Wang
2025-05-06 14:36 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-11-28 7:40 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] mm: shmem: add a kernel command line to change the default huge policy " Baolin Wang
2024-11-28 7:40 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] docs: tmpfs: update the large folios policy for tmpfs and shmem Baolin Wang
2024-11-28 7:40 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] docs: tmpfs: drop 'fadvise()' from the documentation Baolin Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=57dc4929-268b-4f3f-a0f8-43d6ec85974f@linux.alibaba.com \
--to=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=21cnbao@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=da.gomez@kernel.org \
--cc=da.gomez@samsung.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=eero.t.tamminen@intel.com \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=ioworker0@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=regressions@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox