From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>, Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@intel.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>, X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>,
"Shanbhogue, Vedvyas" <vedvyas.shanbhogue@intel.com>,
"Ravi V. Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@intel.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
mike.kravetz@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/9] x86/mm: Shadow stack page fault error checking
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2018 09:56:36 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5764865a-1dd2-ec5b-c67c-1ea322aea203@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALCETrXA--XrVNvPM4-Cv6-E6OFd=TZ5Gw_MWePt7MtqCBBqRg@mail.gmail.com>
On 06/07/2018 09:26 AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>>
>> + /*
>> + * Verify X86_PF_SHSTK is within a shadow stack VMA.
>> + * It is always an error if there is a shadow stack
>> + * fault outside a shadow stack VMA.
>> + */
>> + if (error_code & X86_PF_SHSTK) {
>> + if (!(vma->vm_flags & VM_SHSTK))
>> + return 1;
>> + return 0;
>> + }
>> +
> What, if anything, would go wrong without this change? It seems like
> it might be purely an optimization. If so, can you mention that in
> the comment?
This is a fine exercise. I'm curious what it does, too.
But, I really like it being explicit in the end. If we depend on
implicit behavior, I really worry that someone breaks it accidentally.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-07 16:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-07 14:36 [PATCH 0/9] Control Flow Enforcement - Part (2) Yu-cheng Yu
2018-06-07 14:36 ` [PATCH 1/9] x86/cet: Control protection exception handler Yu-cheng Yu
2018-06-07 15:46 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-06-07 16:23 ` Yu-cheng Yu
2018-06-08 4:17 ` kbuild test robot
2018-06-08 4:18 ` kbuild test robot
2018-06-07 14:36 ` [PATCH 2/9] x86/cet: Add Kconfig option for user-mode shadow stack Yu-cheng Yu
2018-06-07 15:47 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-06-07 15:58 ` Yu-cheng Yu
2018-06-07 16:28 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-06-07 14:36 ` [PATCH 3/9] mm: Introduce VM_SHSTK for shadow stack memory Yu-cheng Yu
2018-06-07 14:37 ` [PATCH 4/9] x86/mm: Change _PAGE_DIRTY to _PAGE_DIRTY_HW Yu-cheng Yu
2018-06-08 3:53 ` kbuild test robot
2018-06-07 14:37 ` [PATCH 5/9] x86/mm: Introduce _PAGE_DIRTY_SW Yu-cheng Yu
2018-06-08 5:15 ` kbuild test robot
2018-06-07 14:37 ` [PATCH 6/9] x86/mm: Introduce ptep_set_wrprotect_flush and related functions Yu-cheng Yu
2018-06-07 16:24 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-06-07 18:21 ` Dave Hansen
2018-06-07 18:24 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-06-07 20:29 ` Dave Hansen
2018-06-07 20:36 ` Yu-cheng Yu
2018-06-08 0:59 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-06-08 1:20 ` Dave Hansen
2018-06-08 4:43 ` kbuild test robot
2018-06-08 14:13 ` kbuild test robot
2018-06-07 14:37 ` [PATCH 7/9] x86/mm: Shadow stack page fault error checking Yu-cheng Yu
2018-06-07 16:26 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-06-07 16:46 ` Yu-cheng Yu
2018-06-07 16:56 ` Dave Hansen [this message]
2018-06-07 14:37 ` [PATCH 8/9] x86/cet: Handle shadow stack page fault Yu-cheng Yu
2018-06-07 14:37 ` [PATCH 9/9] x86/cet: Handle THP/HugeTLB shadow stack page copying Yu-cheng Yu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5764865a-1dd2-ec5b-c67c-1ea322aea203@linux.intel.com \
--to=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=hjl.tools@gmail.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=ravi.v.shankar@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vedvyas.shanbhogue@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yu-cheng.yu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox