From: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>, Kernel Team <Kernel-team@fb.com>,
"stable@vger.kernel.org" <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/mm/pti: in pti_clone_pgtable() don't increase addr by PUD_SIZE
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2019 16:38:02 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <574AB6C6-2F2F-45CA-8B91-8EEF3D8ADAC4@fb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CCFAB5E0-263E-4D9F-92A5-51922EF5998C@fb.com>
> On Aug 20, 2019, at 9:05 AM, Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>> On Aug 20, 2019, at 7:18 AM, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 8/20/19 7:14 AM, Song Liu wrote:
>>>> *But*, that shouldn't get hit on a Skylake CPU since those have PCIDs
>>>> and shouldn't have a global kernel image. Could you confirm whether
>>>> PCIDs are supported on this CPU?
>>> Yes, pcid is listed in /proc/cpuinfo.
>>
>> So what's going on? Could you confirm exactly which pti_clone_pgtable()
>> is causing you problems? Do you have a theory as to why this manifests
>> as a performance problem rather than a functional one?
>>
>> A diff of these:
>>
>> /sys/kernel/debug/page_tables/current_user
>> /sys/kernel/debug/page_tables/current_kernel
>>
>> before and after your patch might be helpful.
>
> I believe the difference is from the following entries (7 PMDs)
>
> Before the patch:
>
> current_kernel: 0xffffffff81000000-0xffffffff81e04000 14352K ro GLB x pte
> efi: 0xffffffff81000000-0xffffffff81e04000 14352K ro GLB x pte
> kernel: 0xffffffff81000000-0xffffffff81e04000 14352K ro GLB x pte
>
>
> After the patch:
>
> current_kernel: 0xffffffff81000000-0xffffffff81e00000 14M ro PSE GLB x pmd
> efi: 0xffffffff81000000-0xffffffff81e00000 14M ro PSE GLB x pmd
> kernel: 0xffffffff81000000-0xffffffff81e00000 14M ro PSE GLB x pmd
>
> current_kernel and kernel show same data though.
A little more details on how I got here.
We use huge page for hot text and thus reduces iTLB misses. As we
benchmark 5.2 based kernel (vs. 4.16 based), we found ~2.5x more
iTLB misses.
To figure out the issue, I use a debug patch that dumps page table for
a pid. The following are information from the workload pid.
For the 4.16 based kernel:
host-4.16 # grep "x pmd" /sys/kernel/debug/page_tables/dump_pid
0x0000000000600000-0x0000000000e00000 8M USR ro PSE x pmd
0xffffffff81a00000-0xffffffff81c00000 2M ro PSE x pmd
For the 5.2 based kernel before this patch:
host-5.2-before # grep "x pmd" /sys/kernel/debug/page_tables/dump_pid
0x0000000000600000-0x0000000000e00000 8M USR ro PSE x pmd
The 8MB text in pmd is from user space. 4.16 kernel has 1 pmd for the
irq entry table; while 4.16 kernel doesn't have it.
For the 5.2 based kernel after this patch:
host-5.2-after # grep "x pmd" /sys/kernel/debug/page_tables/dump_pid
0x0000000000600000-0x0000000000e00000 8M USR ro PSE x pmd
0xffffffff81000000-0xffffffff81e00000 14M ro PSE GLB x pmd
So after this patch, the 5.2 based kernel has 7 PMDs instead of 1 PMD
in 4.16 kernel. This further reduces iTLB miss rate
Thanks,
Song
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-20 16:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-20 7:51 Song Liu
2019-08-20 9:12 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-08-20 13:17 ` Song Liu
2019-08-20 10:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-08-20 11:16 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-08-20 13:21 ` Song Liu
2019-08-20 13:39 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-08-20 13:55 ` Rik van Riel
2019-08-20 14:00 ` Song Liu
2019-08-20 16:56 ` [PATCH v2] " Rik van Riel
2019-08-20 13:21 ` [PATCH] " Rik van Riel
2019-08-20 13:19 ` Song Liu
2019-08-20 13:57 ` Dave Hansen
2019-08-20 14:14 ` Song Liu
2019-08-20 14:18 ` Dave Hansen
2019-08-20 16:05 ` Song Liu
2019-08-20 16:38 ` Song Liu [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=574AB6C6-2F2F-45CA-8B91-8EEF3D8ADAC4@fb.com \
--to=songliubraving@fb.com \
--cc=Kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jroedel@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox