From: Libo Chen <libo.chen@oracle.com>
To: "Chen, Yu C" <yu.c.chen@intel.com>, "Michal Koutný" <mkoutny@suse.com>
Cc: "Jain, Ayush" <ayushjai@amd.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Mel Gorman <mgormanmgorman@suse.de>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>,
"Chen, Tim C" <tim.c.chen@intel.com>,
Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@intel.com>,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
Madadi Vineeth Reddy <vineethr@linux.ibm.com>,
Neeraj.Upadhyay@amd.com, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] sched/numa: add statistics of numa balance task migration
Date: Mon, 5 May 2025 11:49:56 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5735cb9d-86ae-4c8d-b0b0-5b0365843707@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0bdc72c0-8f4a-4d91-8e67-f8d56dc26788@intel.com>
On 5/5/25 11:27, Chen, Yu C wrote:
> Hi Michal,
>
> On 5/6/2025 1:46 AM, Michal Koutný wrote:
>> On Mon, May 05, 2025 at 11:03:10PM +0800, "Chen, Yu C" <yu.c.chen@intel.com> wrote:
>>> According to this address,
>>> 4c 8b af 50 09 00 00 mov 0x950(%rdi),%r13 <--- r13 = p->mm;
>>> 49 8b bd 98 04 00 00 mov 0x498(%r13),%rdi <--- p->mm->owner
>>> It seems that this task to be swapped has NULL mm_struct.
>>
>> So it's likely a kernel thread. Does it make sense to NUMA balance
>> those? (I naïvely think it doesn't, please correct me.) ...
>>
>
> I agree kernel threads are not supposed to be covered by
> NUMA balance, because currently NUMA balance only considers
> user pages via VMAs, and one question below:
>
>>> static void __migrate_swap_task(struct task_struct *p, int cpu)
>>> {
>>> __schedstat_inc(p->stats.numa_task_swapped);
>>> - count_memcg_event_mm(p->mm, NUMA_TASK_SWAP);
>>> + if (p->mm)
>>> + count_memcg_event_mm(p->mm, NUMA_TASK_SWAP);
>>
>> ... proper fix should likely guard this earlier, like the guard in
>> task_numa_fault() but for the other swapped task.
> I see. For task swapping in task_numa_compare(),
> it is triggered when there are no idle CPUs in task A's
> preferred node.
> In this case, we choose a task B on A's preferred node,
> and swap B with A. This helps improve A's Numa locality
> without introducing the load imbalance between Nodes.
>
> But B's Numa node preference is not mandatory in
> current implementation IIUC, because B's load is mainly
hmm, that's doesn't seem to be right, can we choose B that
is not a kthread from A's preferred node?
> considered. That is to say, is it legit to swap a
> Numa sensitive task A with a non-Numa sensitive kernel
> thread B? If not, I think we can add kernel thread
> check in task swap like the guard in
> task_tick_numa()/task_numa_fault().
>
> thanks,
> Chenyu
>
>>
>> Michal
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-05 18:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-30 10:36 Chen Yu
2025-05-01 7:00 ` Libo Chen
2025-05-02 9:30 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-05-05 6:43 ` Jain, Ayush
2025-05-05 15:03 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-05-05 17:25 ` Venkat Rao Bagalkote
2025-05-07 11:36 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-05-05 17:46 ` Michal Koutný
2025-05-05 18:27 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-05-05 18:49 ` Libo Chen [this message]
2025-05-05 21:32 ` Libo Chen
2025-05-05 21:57 ` Libo Chen
2025-05-06 5:06 ` Jain, Ayush
2025-05-06 5:36 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-05-06 7:03 ` Libo Chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5735cb9d-86ae-4c8d-b0b0-5b0365843707@oracle.com \
--to=libo.chen@oracle.com \
--cc=Neeraj.Upadhyay@amd.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aubrey.li@intel.com \
--cc=ayushjai@amd.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgormanmgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=tim.c.chen@intel.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=vineethr@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox