linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
	Joonsoo Kim <js1304@gmail.com>,
	Hillf Danton <hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/14] mm: use compaction feedback for thp backoff conditions
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2016 10:53:18 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5721CF7E.9020106@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1461181647-8039-10-git-send-email-mhocko@kernel.org>

On 04/20/2016 09:47 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
>
> THP requests skip the direct reclaim if the compaction is either
> deferred or contended to reduce stalls which wouldn't help the
> allocation success anyway. These checks are ignoring other potential
> feedback modes which we have available now.
>
> It clearly doesn't make much sense to go and reclaim few pages if the
> previous compaction has failed.
>
> We can also simplify the check by using compaction_withdrawn which
> checks for both COMPACT_CONTENDED and COMPACT_DEFERRED. This check
> is however covering more reasons why the compaction was withdrawn.
> None of them should be a problem for the THP case though.
>
> It is safe to back of if we see COMPACT_SKIPPED because that means
> that compaction_suitable failed and a single round of the reclaim is
> unlikely to make any difference here. We would have to be close to
> the low watermark to reclaim enough and even then there is no guarantee
> that the compaction would make any progress while the direct reclaim
> would have caused the stall.
>
> COMPACT_PARTIAL_SKIPPED is slightly different because that means that we
> have only seen a part of the zone so a retry would make some sense. But
> it would be a compaction retry not a reclaim retry to perform. We are
> not doing that and that might indeed lead to situations where THP fails
> but this should happen only rarely and it would be really hard to
> measure.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>

THP's don't compact by default in page fault path anymore, so we don't 
need to restrict them even more. And hopefully we'll replace the 
is_thp_gfp_mask() hack with something better soon, so this might be just 
extra code churn. But I don't feel strongly enough to nack it.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-04-28  8:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-20 19:47 [PATCH 0.14] oom detection rework v6 Michal Hocko
2016-04-20 19:47 ` [PATCH 01/14] vmscan: consider classzone_idx in compaction_ready Michal Hocko
2016-04-21  3:32   ` Hillf Danton
2016-05-04 13:56   ` Michal Hocko
2016-04-20 19:47 ` [PATCH 02/14] mm, compaction: change COMPACT_ constants into enum Michal Hocko
2016-04-20 19:47 ` [PATCH 03/14] mm, compaction: cover all compaction mode in compact_zone Michal Hocko
2016-04-20 19:47 ` [PATCH 04/14] mm, compaction: distinguish COMPACT_DEFERRED from COMPACT_SKIPPED Michal Hocko
2016-04-21  7:08   ` Hillf Danton
2016-04-20 19:47 ` [PATCH 05/14] mm, compaction: distinguish between full and partial COMPACT_COMPLETE Michal Hocko
2016-04-21  6:39   ` Hillf Danton
2016-04-20 19:47 ` [PATCH 06/14] mm, compaction: Update compaction_result ordering Michal Hocko
2016-04-21  6:45   ` Hillf Danton
2016-04-20 19:47 ` [PATCH 07/14] mm, compaction: Simplify __alloc_pages_direct_compact feedback interface Michal Hocko
2016-04-21  6:50   ` Hillf Danton
2016-04-20 19:47 ` [PATCH 08/14] mm, compaction: Abstract compaction feedback to helpers Michal Hocko
2016-04-21  6:57   ` Hillf Danton
2016-04-28  8:47   ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-04-20 19:47 ` [PATCH 09/14] mm: use compaction feedback for thp backoff conditions Michal Hocko
2016-04-21  7:05   ` Hillf Danton
2016-04-28  8:53   ` Vlastimil Babka [this message]
2016-04-28 12:35     ` Michal Hocko
2016-04-29  9:16       ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-04-29  9:28         ` Michal Hocko
2016-04-20 19:47 ` [PATCH 10/14] mm, oom: rework oom detection Michal Hocko
2016-04-20 19:47 ` [PATCH 11/14] mm: throttle on IO only when there are too many dirty and writeback pages Michal Hocko
2016-04-20 19:47 ` [PATCH 12/14] mm, oom: protect !costly allocations some more Michal Hocko
2016-04-21  8:03   ` Hillf Danton
2016-05-04  6:01   ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-05-04  6:31     ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-05-04  8:56       ` Michal Hocko
2016-05-04 14:57         ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-05-04 18:19           ` Michal Hocko
2016-05-04  8:53     ` Michal Hocko
2016-05-04 14:39       ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-05-04 18:20         ` Michal Hocko
2016-04-20 19:47 ` [PATCH 13/14] mm: consider compaction feedback also for costly allocation Michal Hocko
2016-04-21  8:13   ` Hillf Danton
2016-04-20 19:47 ` [PATCH 14/14] mm, oom, compaction: prevent from should_compact_retry looping for ever for costly orders Michal Hocko
2016-04-21  8:24   ` Hillf Danton
2016-04-28  8:59   ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-04-28 12:39     ` Michal Hocko
2016-05-04  6:27   ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-05-04  9:04     ` Michal Hocko
2016-05-04 15:14       ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-05-04 19:22         ` Michal Hocko
2016-05-04  5:45 ` [PATCH 0.14] oom detection rework v6 Joonsoo Kim
2016-05-04  8:12   ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-05-04  8:32     ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-05-04  8:50     ` Michal Hocko
2016-05-04  8:47   ` Michal Hocko
2016-05-04 14:32     ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-05-04 18:16       ` Michal Hocko
2016-05-10  6:41         ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-05-10  7:09           ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-05-10  8:00             ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-05-10  9:44               ` Michal Hocko
2016-05-10  9:43           ` Michal Hocko
2016-05-12  2:23             ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-05-12  5:19               ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-05-12 10:59               ` Michal Hocko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5721CF7E.9020106@suse.cz \
    --to=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com \
    --cc=js1304@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox