From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
Joonsoo Kim <js1304@gmail.com>,
Hillf Danton <hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/11] mm, compaction: Abstract compaction feedback to helpers
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 13:53:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <570CE1CB.7070106@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160411151410.GL23157@dhcp22.suse.cz>
On 04/11/2016 05:14 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Mon 11-04-16 16:39:21, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
>> On 04/05/2016 01:25 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> [...]
>>> +/* Compaction has failed and it doesn't make much sense to keep retrying. */
>>> +static inline bool compaction_failed(enum compact_result result)
>>> +{
>>> + /* All zones where scanned completely and still not result. */
>>
>> Hmm given that try_to_compact_pages() uses a max() on results, then in fact
>> it takes only one zone to get this. Others could have been also SKIPPED or
>> DEFERRED. Is that what you want?
>
> In short I didn't find any better way and still guarantee a some
> guarantee of convergence. COMPACT_COMPLETE means that at least one zone
> was completely scanned and led to no result. That zone would be
> compact_suitable by definition. If I made DEFERRED or SKIPPED more
> priorite (aka higher in the enum) then I could easily end up in a state
> where all zones would return COMPACT_COMPLETE and few remaining would
> just alternate returning their DEFFERED resp. SKIPPED. So while this
> might sound like giving up too early I couldn't come up with anything
> more specific that would lead to reliable results.
>
> I am open to any suggestions of course.
I guess you would have to track each zone separately and make sure
you've seen COMPACT_COMPLETE in all of them, although not necessary
during the same zonelist attempt. But then do the same for reclaim, as
you would also have to match COMPAT_SKIPPED and inability of reclaim...
and that gets uglier and uglier, and also against the move to node-based
reclaim...
So there's a danger that you'll see COMPACT_COMPLETE on a small ZONE_DMA
early on, before the larger zones even stop being deferred, but I don't
see an easy solution.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-12 11:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-05 11:25 [PATCH 00/11] oom detection rework v5 Michal Hocko
2016-04-05 11:25 ` [PATCH 01/11] mm, oom: rework oom detection Michal Hocko
2016-04-05 11:25 ` [PATCH 02/11] mm: throttle on IO only when there are too many dirty and writeback pages Michal Hocko
2016-04-05 11:25 ` [PATCH 03/11] mm, compaction: change COMPACT_ constants into enum Michal Hocko
2016-04-05 11:25 ` [PATCH 04/11] mm, compaction: cover all compaction mode in compact_zone Michal Hocko
2016-04-05 11:25 ` [PATCH 05/11] mm, compaction: distinguish COMPACT_DEFERRED from COMPACT_SKIPPED Michal Hocko
2016-04-11 11:02 ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-04-11 11:24 ` Michal Hocko
2016-04-05 11:25 ` [PATCH 06/11] mm, compaction: distinguish between full and partial COMPACT_COMPLETE Michal Hocko
2016-04-11 12:10 ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-04-11 12:46 ` Michal Hocko
2016-04-11 12:53 ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-04-11 13:27 ` Michal Hocko
2016-04-11 13:42 ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-04-11 13:46 ` Michal Hocko
2016-04-05 11:25 ` [PATCH 07/11] mm, compaction: Update compaction_result ordering Michal Hocko
2016-04-11 12:16 ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-04-05 11:25 ` [PATCH 08/11] mm, compaction: Simplify __alloc_pages_direct_compact feedback interface Michal Hocko
2016-04-11 13:48 ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-04-05 11:25 ` [PATCH 09/11] mm, compaction: Abstract compaction feedback to helpers Michal Hocko
2016-04-05 23:58 ` Andrew Morton
2016-04-06 0:55 ` Hugh Dickins
2016-04-06 9:26 ` Michal Hocko
2016-04-06 17:46 ` Andrew Morton
2016-04-11 14:39 ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-04-11 15:14 ` Michal Hocko
2016-04-11 15:33 ` Michal Hocko
2016-04-12 11:53 ` Vlastimil Babka [this message]
2016-04-12 12:23 ` Michal Hocko
2016-04-11 15:40 ` Michal Hocko
2016-04-11 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH] mm: use compaction feedback for thp backoff conditions Michal Hocko
2016-04-12 11:54 ` [PATCH 09/11] mm, compaction: Abstract compaction feedback to helpers Vlastimil Babka
2016-04-05 11:25 ` [PATCH 10/11] mm, oom: protect !costly allocations some more Michal Hocko
2016-04-06 0:06 ` Andrew Morton
2016-04-06 9:28 ` Michal Hocko
2016-04-11 14:48 ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-04-05 11:25 ` [PATCH 11/11] mm: consider compaction feedback also for costly allocation Michal Hocko
2016-04-05 12:46 ` Michal Hocko
2016-04-11 15:07 ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-04-05 12:47 ` [PATCH 00/11] oom detection rework v5 Michal Hocko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=570CE1CB.7070106@suse.cz \
--to=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com \
--cc=js1304@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox