From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pf0-f181.google.com (mail-pf0-f181.google.com [209.85.192.181]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD8516B0262 for ; Thu, 3 Mar 2016 18:49:13 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-pf0-f181.google.com with SMTP id 124so23774523pfg.0 for ; Thu, 03 Mar 2016 15:49:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from blackbird.sr71.net (www.sr71.net. [198.145.64.142]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id y27si1253337pfi.175.2016.03.03.15.49.12 for ; Thu, 03 Mar 2016 15:49:12 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/7] System Calls for Memory Protection Keys References: <20160223011107.FB9B8215@viggo.jf.intel.com> From: Dave Hansen Message-ID: <56D8CD77.1090603@sr71.net> Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2016 15:49:11 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: mtk.manpages@gmail.com Cc: lkml , Linux API , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , "x86@kernel.org" , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton On 03/03/2016 12:05 AM, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote: >> > I have manpages written for some of these syscalls, and I will >> > submit a full set of manpages once we've reached some consensus >> > on what the interfaces should be. > Please don't do things in this order. Providing man pages up front > make it easier for people to understand, review, and critique the API. > Submitting man pages should be a foundational part of submitting a new > set of interfaces and discussing their design. Michael, thanks for taking a look, plus the very detailed previous review you did of the first batch of man-pages that I posted. I've posted a newer version including all of the new system calls, and I've attempted to address all the earlier review comments you made. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org