From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 655E7EB64D8 for ; Thu, 22 Jun 2023 08:06:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id BA0CD8D0002; Thu, 22 Jun 2023 04:06:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id B50FB8D0001; Thu, 22 Jun 2023 04:06:39 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id A1A318D0002; Thu, 22 Jun 2023 04:06:39 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0011.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.11]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E5E88D0001 for ; Thu, 22 Jun 2023 04:06:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin24.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay01.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4931C1C8CE1 for ; Thu, 22 Jun 2023 08:06:39 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 80929652118.24.551474F Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) by imf10.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0887C0013 for ; Thu, 22 Jun 2023 08:06:36 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: imf10.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=ibm.com header.s=pp1 header.b=F1B2WVgh; spf=pass (imf10.hostedemail.com: domain of sachinp@linux.ibm.com designates 148.163.156.1 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=sachinp@linux.ibm.com; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=ibm.com ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hostedemail.com; s=arc-20220608; t=1687421197; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:dkim-signature; bh=H8LdlmX/gsBoPJ5VEWnUihpFedu5RsNoIbfQGlSDio4=; b=s0fM1uPcitfUGwEc8mb7LHhRd/enZI/Z6i5CiPqFN5iUKUZpfRd/Um4O7+XdFk52m8QveN q/L1uXbkt9TS/xjiLmOTPveYlTjI5OmX6idSZSj3aAPMstMgKe6xe3sdfHbmD/jtDpjfF/ SmQ48+/O6F7tP6SsvWkbXyV5l6SwDv8= ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-20220608; d=hostedemail.com; t=1687421197; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=RA7LQSbF+q5etTXNpI3dKsBUhC5wcYaz25ifMURHYq9tknlajUWnHyL0f6fEEZ+S30GXDx vONdTJ8ZaCA9FP06d21lvEojxwZaOYywuNyxpdV9SnmfEVF1sh/2QPlfT+b3srg5F6tQkG US6koKEZB/DNSFMpBS7SgFkhkHbmesw= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; imf10.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=ibm.com header.s=pp1 header.b=F1B2WVgh; spf=pass (imf10.hostedemail.com: domain of sachinp@linux.ibm.com designates 148.163.156.1 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=sachinp@linux.ibm.com; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=ibm.com Received: from pps.filterd (m0353726.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTP id 35M86MSB030132; Thu, 22 Jun 2023 08:06:33 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=content-type : subject : from : in-reply-to : date : cc : message-id : references : to : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=pp1; bh=H8LdlmX/gsBoPJ5VEWnUihpFedu5RsNoIbfQGlSDio4=; b=F1B2WVghOV5TXnTFxcFx2FUBG9lD2eKoIeYwKmX8pHjDSZeKtDuTbRf07RuHij3Pgr6P z5lyglFBmFjhIBATMnzu21vsOP1wc7gZoVZMstTZh5DtAjhslsRdykYq2MrkUjJXb+9x FceCPbSq8dJ0QEbIr55fcUfeNHg5kBLjeK/ihckwXvkbjGu7tWkrleSgfs71dWMN6b4e PhiMCNQxThcQ4fTMgm2swJdpGUa1iGDzR2LiYXNNIh1TjzdTzcPX3vRTNX3Entyvw1e2 R9OZOWX07Kil2d6Es10+K2wjud437+NLWphiV63jWDsXCNoiNLqtJlT9Sax4rv9DOJir NA== Received: from ppma06ams.nl.ibm.com (66.31.33a9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.51.49.102]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3rcj8cg8ys-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 22 Jun 2023 08:06:25 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma06ams.nl.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma06ams.nl.ibm.com (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTP id 35LMLSGM028057; Thu, 22 Jun 2023 08:01:55 GMT Received: from smtprelay06.fra02v.mail.ibm.com ([9.218.2.230]) by ppma06ams.nl.ibm.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3r943e3ax2-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 22 Jun 2023 08:01:54 +0000 Received: from smtpav04.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (smtpav04.fra02v.mail.ibm.com [10.20.54.103]) by smtprelay06.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 35M81qJN18350628 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 22 Jun 2023 08:01:52 GMT Received: from smtpav04.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9244020287; Thu, 22 Jun 2023 08:01:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpav04.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF09420282; Thu, 22 Jun 2023 08:01:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpclient.apple (unknown [9.109.241.192]) by smtpav04.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Jun 2023 08:01:51 +0000 (GMT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: [6.4.0-rc7-next-20230620] Boot failure on IBM Power LPAR From: Sachin Sant In-Reply-To: <87edm5pj4u.fsf@mail.lhotse> Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2023 13:31:40 +0530 Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linuxppc-dev Message-Id: <568F6E65-DBDF-43F2-8B3E-E783AE5A2B6C@linux.ibm.com> References: <87edm5pj4u.fsf@mail.lhotse> To: Michael Ellerman X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3731.600.7) X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: HzhqrMOXasp1JCtoz2C7lvM3NEZbOct9 X-Proofpoint-GUID: HzhqrMOXasp1JCtoz2C7lvM3NEZbOct9 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Proofpoint-UnRewURL: 0 URL was un-rewritten MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.254,Aquarius:18.0.957,Hydra:6.0.591,FMLib:17.11.176.26 definitions=2023-06-22_04,2023-06-16_01,2023-05-22_02 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 malwarescore=0 clxscore=1015 impostorscore=0 suspectscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 adultscore=0 mlxlogscore=980 bulkscore=0 mlxscore=0 phishscore=0 priorityscore=1501 spamscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2305260000 definitions=main-2306220066 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: D0887C0013 X-Rspam-User: X-Stat-Signature: ggfg5dezu7mpdhyjfsb3mwhgz5aiu9fh X-Rspamd-Server: rspam03 X-HE-Tag: 1687421196-721423 X-HE-Meta: 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 vOK2lFTd W5GybqunObLv5J8JGVDOx46yk0ZfI/km9oWJ+0J54cO5Hu2puj9/Sium0TKErBhnUSupyWcnI5LqaKgJ7nJQfe2g6YSD3deelWhpX4UIN5JNVjLSgC7DqH+2dxS9eB63PauIJvY3Dn7HKysUe6tHTYpivf9szz/FyJxr3SJ1ZPoJ6H5in9Xdrs6k2oPHeFeQFtZkkJk1cHaom1A/v4iIBzP677BM1++I4Rxsn0sAbZ3nyGFK9yHMBdD7slg== X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: >> The problem was introduced in 6.4.0-rc7-next-20230619. I tried git bisec= t, but unsure of the >> result reported by it. Bisect points to following patch >>=20 >> # git bisect bad >> 70c94cc2eefd4f98d222834cbe7512804977c2d4 is the first bad commit >> commit 70c94cc2eefd4f98d222834cbe7512804977c2d4 >> Merge: 48f5ee5c48c3 3fe08f7d5e80 >> Author: Stephen Rothwell >> Date: Tue Jun 20 09:43:25 2023 +1000 >>=20 >> Merge branch 'mm-everything' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/ke= rnel/git/akpm/mm >> # Conflicts: >> # mm/mmap.c >=20 > Usually bisect pointing to a merge means something has gone wrong with > the bisect. It's not impossible for a merge to be the cause of a bug, > but IME it's rare. >=20 I have tried the bisect 3 times and the result was same. It always points to this merge commit. Is there anything else I can try to help debug this issue? -Sachin=