linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "David Wang" <00107082@163.com>
To: "Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)" <urezki@gmail.com>
Cc: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Baoquan He" <bhe@redhat.com>, "Harry Yoo" <harry.yoo@oracle.com>,
	"Suren Baghdasaryan" <surenb@google.com>
Subject: Re:[PATCH 1/2] lib/test_vmalloc.c: Use late_initcall() if built-in for init ordering
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2025 17:07:15 +0800 (CST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5686796f.8f47.197a1310b6d.Coremail.00107082@163.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250623184035.581229-1-urezki@gmail.com>


At 2025-06-24 02:40:34, "Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)" <urezki@gmail.com> wrote:
>When the vmalloc test code is compiled as a built-in, use late_initcall()
>instead of module_init() to defer a vmalloc test execution until most
>subsystems are up and running.
>
>It avoids interfering with components that may not yet be initialized
>at module_init() time. For example, there was a recent report of memory
>profiling infrastructure not being ready early enough leading to kernel
>crash.
>
>By using late_initcall() in the built-in case, we ensure the tests are
>run at a safer point during a boot sequence.
>
>Cc: Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@oracle.com>
>Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
>Cc: David Wang <00107082@163.com>
>Signed-off-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com>
>---
> lib/test_vmalloc.c | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
>diff --git a/lib/test_vmalloc.c b/lib/test_vmalloc.c
>index 1b0b59549aaf1..7264781750c96 100644
>--- a/lib/test_vmalloc.c
>+++ b/lib/test_vmalloc.c
>@@ -598,7 +598,11 @@ static int __init vmalloc_test_init(void)
> 	return IS_BUILTIN(CONFIG_TEST_VMALLOC) ? 0:-EAGAIN;
> }
> 
>+#ifdef MODULE
> module_init(vmalloc_test_init)
>+#else
>+late_initcall(vmalloc_test_init);

>+#endif


When MODULE defined,  late_initcall is defined as module_init in ./include/linux/module.h
I think the MODULE check here is redundant,  (it is clearer though)




> 
> MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> MODULE_AUTHOR("Uladzislau Rezki");
>-- 
>2.39.5

  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-06-24  9:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-06-23 18:40 [PATCH " Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2025-06-23 18:40 ` [PATCH 2/2] lib/test_vmalloc.c: Restrict default test mask to avoid test warnings Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2025-06-24  9:34   ` Baoquan He
2025-06-24  8:30 ` [PATCH 1/2] lib/test_vmalloc.c: Use late_initcall() if built-in for init ordering Baoquan He
2025-06-24  9:07 ` David Wang [this message]
2025-06-24 11:42   ` Uladzislau Rezki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5686796f.8f47.197a1310b6d.Coremail.00107082@163.com \
    --to=00107082@163.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bhe@redhat.com \
    --cc=harry.yoo@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=urezki@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox