From: Kamezawa Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@virtuozzo.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] mm: memcontrol: charge swap to cgroup2
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 12:18:30 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5670D806.60408@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151215145011.GA20355@cmpxchg.org>
On 2015/12/15 23:50, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 12:22:41PM +0900, Kamezawa Hiroyuki wrote:
>> On 2015/12/15 4:42, Vladimir Davydov wrote:
>>> Anyway, if you don't trust a container you'd better set the hard memory
>>> limit so that it can't hurt others no matter what it runs and how it
>>> tweaks its sub-tree knobs.
>>
>> Limiting swap can easily cause "OOM-Killer even while there are available swap"
>> with easy mistake. Can't you add "swap excess" switch to sysctl to allow global
>> memory reclaim can ignore swap limitation ?
>
> That never worked with a combined memory+swap limit, either. How could
> it? The parent might swap you out under pressure, but simply touching
> a few of your anon pages causes them to get swapped back in, thrashing
> with whatever the parent was trying to do. Your ability to swap it out
> is simply no protection against a group touching its pages.
>
> Allowing the parent to exceed swap with separate counters makes even
> less sense, because every page swapped out frees up a page of memory
> that the child can reuse. For every swap page that exceeds the limit,
> the child gets a free memory page! The child doesn't even have to
> cause swapin, it can just steal whatever the parent tried to free up,
> and meanwhile its combined memory & swap footprint explodes.
>
Sure.
> The answer is and always should have been: don't overcommit untrusted
> cgroups. Think of swap as a resource you distribute, not as breathing
> room for the parents to rely on. Because it can't and could never.
>
ok, don't overcommmit.
> And the new separate swap counter makes this explicit.
>
Hmm, my requests are
- set the same capabilities as mlock() to set swap.limit=0
- swap-full notification via vmpressure or something mechanism.
- OOM-Killer's available memory calculation may be corrupted, please check.
- force swap-in at reducing swap.limit
Thanks,
-Kame
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-16 3:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-10 11:39 [PATCH 0/7] Add swap accounting " Vladimir Davydov
2015-12-10 11:39 ` [PATCH 1/7] mm: memcontrol: charge swap " Vladimir Davydov
2015-12-10 16:00 ` Johannes Weiner
2015-12-10 17:00 ` Vladimir Davydov
2015-12-11 2:48 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2015-12-11 7:39 ` Vladimir Davydov
2015-12-14 15:30 ` Michal Hocko
2015-12-14 15:48 ` Johannes Weiner
2015-12-14 19:42 ` Vladimir Davydov
2015-12-14 19:52 ` One Thousand Gnomes
2015-12-15 3:22 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2015-12-15 11:02 ` Vladimir Davydov
2015-12-16 2:44 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2015-12-15 14:50 ` Johannes Weiner
2015-12-16 3:18 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki [this message]
2015-12-16 11:09 ` Johannes Weiner
2015-12-17 2:46 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2015-12-17 3:32 ` Johannes Weiner
2015-12-17 4:29 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2015-12-15 17:21 ` Michal Hocko
2015-12-15 20:22 ` Johannes Weiner
2015-12-16 3:57 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2015-12-15 3:12 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2015-12-15 8:30 ` Vladimir Davydov
2015-12-15 9:29 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2015-12-10 11:39 ` [PATCH 2/7] mm: vmscan: pass memcg to get_scan_count() Vladimir Davydov
2015-12-11 19:24 ` Johannes Weiner
2015-12-10 11:39 ` [PATCH 3/7] mm: memcontrol: replace mem_cgroup_lruvec_online with mem_cgroup_online Vladimir Davydov
2015-12-11 19:25 ` Johannes Weiner
2015-12-10 11:39 ` [PATCH 4/7] swap.h: move memcg related stuff to the end of the file Vladimir Davydov
2015-12-11 19:25 ` Johannes Weiner
2015-12-10 11:39 ` [PATCH 5/7] mm: vmscan: do not scan anon pages if memcg swap limit is hit Vladimir Davydov
2015-12-11 19:27 ` Johannes Weiner
2015-12-10 11:39 ` [PATCH 6/7] mm: free swap cache aggressively if memcg swap is full Vladimir Davydov
2015-12-11 19:33 ` Johannes Weiner
2015-12-12 16:18 ` Vladimir Davydov
2015-12-10 11:39 ` [PATCH 7/7] Documentation: cgroup: add memory.swap.{current,max} description Vladimir Davydov
2015-12-11 19:42 ` Johannes Weiner
2015-12-12 16:19 ` Vladimir Davydov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5670D806.60408@jp.fujitsu.com \
--to=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=vdavydov@virtuozzo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox