From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FB82C433F5 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2022 18:30:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id CD84C6B0071; Thu, 7 Apr 2022 14:30:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id C876A6B0073; Thu, 7 Apr 2022 14:30:23 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id B4F676B0074; Thu, 7 Apr 2022 14:30:23 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (relay.a.hostedemail.com [64.99.140.24]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A863E6B0071 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2022 14:30:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin13.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay06.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77CEF29105 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2022 18:30:13 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 79330922706.13.F48D434 Received: from pegase2.c-s.fr (pegase2.c-s.fr [93.17.235.10]) by imf01.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A097440009 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2022 18:30:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (mailhub3.si.c-s.fr [172.26.127.67]) by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4KZ90d2yhcz9sRn; Thu, 7 Apr 2022 20:30:09 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at c-s.fr Received: from pegase2.c-s.fr ([172.26.127.65]) by localhost (pegase2.c-s.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YiRAN_PMiJwo; Thu, 7 Apr 2022 20:30:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: from messagerie.si.c-s.fr (messagerie.si.c-s.fr [192.168.25.192]) by pegase2.c-s.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4KZ90d23v1z9sRk; Thu, 7 Apr 2022 20:30:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by messagerie.si.c-s.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 384238B765; Thu, 7 Apr 2022 20:30:09 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at c-s.fr Received: from messagerie.si.c-s.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (messagerie.si.c-s.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10023) with ESMTP id CznV1Ldv3Bfe; Thu, 7 Apr 2022 20:30:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.202.234] (unknown [192.168.202.234]) by messagerie.si.c-s.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C8908B792; Thu, 7 Apr 2022 20:30:07 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <5666917d-81b3-e010-776a-2c2ddccd400e@csgroup.eu> Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2022 20:30:06 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.7.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 00/14] Convert powerpc to default topdown mmap layout (v8) Content-Language: fr-FR From: Christophe Leroy To: Andrew Morton , Michael Ellerman Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , "catalin.marinas@arm.com" , "will@kernel.org" , "alex@ghiti.fr" , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Paul Mackerras , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" References: <877d91m7wd.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au> <20220310204917.3d42e6cf3088f7cf1c7fe7a6@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Rspam-User: X-Stat-Signature: mzwokozhztodtpb9a9yew5r3bj15y44x Authentication-Results: imf01.hostedemail.com; dkim=none; spf=pass (imf01.hostedemail.com: domain of christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu designates 93.17.235.10 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu; dmarc=none X-Rspamd-Server: rspam01 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: A097440009 X-HE-Tag: 1649356212-757779 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: Hi Andrew, Le 04/04/2022 à 07:22, Christophe Leroy a écrit : > Hi Andrew, > > Le 11/03/2022 à 05:49, Andrew Morton a écrit : >> On Fri, 11 Mar 2022 15:26:42 +1100 Michael Ellerman >> wrote: >> >>>> What will be the merge strategy ? I guess it's a bit late to get it >>>> through powerpc tree, so I was just wondering whether we could get >>>> patches 2 to 5 in mm this cycle, and the powerpc ones next cycle ? >>> >>> Yeah I didn't pick it up because the mm changes don't have many acks and >>> I'm always nervous about carrying generic mm changes. >>> >>> It would be my preference if Andrew could take 2-5 through mm for v5.18, >>> but it is quite late, so I'm not sure how he will feel about that. >> >> 5.18 isn't a problem.  Perhaps you meant 5.17, which would be real tough. >> >> Can we take a look after 5.18-rc1? > > 5.18-rc1 was released last night. > > Can you take patchs 2-5 as they are, or do you prefer I resend them to > yourself as a standalone series ? > Are you expecting anything from me ? Do you need a resend of those 4 patches as a standalone series ? Thanks Christiphe