From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arch@vger.kernel.org" <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
"arnd@arndb.de" <arnd@arndb.de>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"sakari.ailus@iki.fi" <sakari.ailus@iki.fi>,
"sumit.semwal@linaro.org" <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"m.szyprowski@samsung.com" <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] dma-debug: Allow poisoning nonzero allocations
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2015 20:17:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56156FAF.9020002@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150929142727.e95a2d2ebff65dda86315248@linux-foundation.org>
On 29/09/15 22:27, Andrew Morton wrote:
[...]
> If I'm understanding things correctly, some allocators zero the memory
> by default and others do not. And we have an unknown number of drivers
> which are assuming that the memory is zeroed.
>
> Correct?
That's precisely the motivation here, yes.
> If so, our options are
>
> a) audit all callers, find the ones which expect zeroed memory but
> aren't passing __GFP_ZERO and fix them.
>
> b) convert all allocators to zero the memory by default.
>
> Obviously, a) is better. How big a job is it?
This I'm not so sure of, hence the very tentative first step. For a very
crude guess at an an upper bound:
$ git grep -E '(dma|pci)_alloc_co(her|nsist)ent' drivers/ | wc -l
1148
vs.
$ git grep -E '(dma|pci)_zalloc_co(her|nsist)ent' drivers/ | wc -l
234
noting that the vast majority of the former are still probably benign,
but picking out those which aren't from the code alone without knowledge
of and/or access to the hardware might be non-trivial.
> This patch will help the process, if people use it.
>
>>>> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DMA_API_DEBUG_POISON) && !(flags & __GFP_ZERO))
>>>> + memset(virt, DMA_ALLOC_POISON, size);
>>>> +
>>>
>>> This is likely to be slow in the case of non-cached memory and large
>>> allocations. The config option should come with a warning.
>>
>> It depends on DMA_API_DEBUG, which already has a stern performance
>> warning, is additionally hidden behind EXPERT, and carries a slightly
>> flippant yet largely truthful warning that actually using it could break
>> pretty much every driver in your system; is that not enough?
>
> It might be helpful to provide a runtime knob as well - having to
> rebuild&reinstall just to enable/disable this feature is a bit painful.
Good point - there's always the global DMA debug disable knob, but this
particular feature probably does warrant finer-grained control to be
really practical. Having thought about it some more, it's also probably
wrong that this doesn't respect the dma_debug_driver filter, given that
it is actually invasive; in fixing that, how about if it also *only*
applied when a specific driver is filtered? Then there would be no
problematic "break anything and everything" mode, and the existing
debugfs controls should suffice.
Robin.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-07 19:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-25 12:15 [PATCH 0/4] Assorted DMA mapping tweaks Robin Murphy
2015-09-25 12:15 ` [PATCH 1/4] dmapool: Fix overflow condition in pool_find_page Robin Murphy
2015-09-25 12:15 ` [PATCH 2/4] dma-mapping: Tidy up dma_parms default handling Robin Murphy
2015-09-25 12:15 ` [PATCH 3/4] dma-debug: Check nents in dma_sync_sg* Robin Murphy
2015-09-25 12:15 ` [PATCH 4/4] dma-debug: Allow poisoning nonzero allocations Robin Murphy
2015-09-25 12:44 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-09-25 17:35 ` Robin Murphy
2015-09-29 21:27 ` Andrew Morton
2015-10-07 19:17 ` Robin Murphy [this message]
2015-10-07 19:33 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56156FAF.9020002@arm.com \
--to=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=sakari.ailus@iki.fi \
--cc=sumit.semwal@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox