linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: borntraeger@de.ibm.com, x86@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	dave.hansen@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/25] x86, pkeys: new page fault error code bit: PF_PK
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 10:19:02 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <560D6B06.6040505@sr71.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1510011351150.4500@nanos>

On 10/01/2015 04:54 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Sep 2015, Dave Hansen wrote:
>> >  
>> >  /*
>> > @@ -916,7 +918,10 @@ static int spurious_fault_check(unsigned
>> >  
>> >  	if ((error_code & PF_INSTR) && !pte_exec(*pte))
>> >  		return 0;
>> > -
>> > +	/*
>> > +	 * Note: We do not do lazy flushing on protection key
>> > +	 * changes, so no spurious fault will ever set PF_PK.
>> > +	 */
> It might be a bit more clear to have:
> 
>    	/* Comment .... */
>   	if ((error_code & PF_PK))
>   		return 1;
> 
>   	return 1;
> 
> That way the comment is associated to obviously redundant code, but
> it's easier to read, especially if we add some new PF_ thingy after
> that.

Agreed, that's a nicer way to do it.  I'll fix it up.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2015-10-01 17:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-09-28 19:18 [PATCH 00/25] x86: Memory Protection Keys Dave Hansen
2015-09-28 19:18 ` [PATCH 02/25] x86, pkeys: Add Kconfig option Dave Hansen
2015-10-01 11:02   ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-09-28 19:18 ` [PATCH 03/25] x86, pkeys: cpuid bit definition Dave Hansen
2015-10-01 11:02   ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-09-28 19:18 ` [PATCH 01/25] x86, fpu: add placeholder for Processor Trace XSAVE state Dave Hansen
2015-10-01 11:01   ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-09-28 19:18 ` [PATCH 06/25] x86, pkeys: PTE bits for storing protection key Dave Hansen
2015-10-01 11:51   ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-09-28 19:18 ` [PATCH 04/25] x86, pku: define new CR4 bit Dave Hansen
2015-10-01 11:03   ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-09-28 19:18 ` [PATCH 05/25] x86, pkey: add PKRU xsave fields and data structure(s) Dave Hansen
2015-10-01 11:50   ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-10-01 17:17     ` Dave Hansen
2015-09-28 19:18 ` [PATCH 08/25] x86, pkeys: store protection in high VMA flags Dave Hansen
2015-09-28 19:18 ` [PATCH 07/25] x86, pkeys: new page fault error code bit: PF_PK Dave Hansen
2015-10-01 11:54   ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-10-01 17:19     ` Dave Hansen [this message]
2015-09-28 19:18 ` [PATCH 10/25] x86, pkeys: pass VMA down in to fault signal generation code Dave Hansen
2015-09-28 19:18 ` [PATCH 09/25] x86, pkeys: arch-specific protection bits Dave Hansen
2015-09-28 19:18 ` [PATCH 12/25] x86, pkeys: add functions to fetch PKRU Dave Hansen
2015-09-28 19:18 ` [PATCH 13/25] mm: factor out VMA fault permission checking Dave Hansen
2015-09-28 19:18 ` [PATCH 11/25] x86, pkeys: notify userspace about protection key faults Dave Hansen
2015-09-28 19:18 ` [PATCH 15/25] x86, pkeys: check VMAs and PTEs for protection keys Dave Hansen
2015-10-22 20:57   ` Jerome Glisse
2015-10-22 21:23     ` Dave Hansen
2015-10-22 22:25       ` Jerome Glisse
2015-10-23  0:49         ` Dave Hansen
2015-09-28 19:18 ` [PATCH 14/25] mm: simplify get_user_pages() PTE bit handling Dave Hansen
2015-09-28 19:18 ` [PATCH 16/25] x86, pkeys: optimize fault handling in access_error() Dave Hansen
2015-09-28 19:18 ` [PATCH 17/25] x86, pkeys: dump PKRU with other kernel registers Dave Hansen
2015-09-28 19:18 ` [PATCH 19/25] x86, pkeys: add Kconfig prompt to existing config option Dave Hansen
2015-09-28 19:18 ` [PATCH 18/25] x86, pkeys: dump PTE pkey in /proc/pid/smaps Dave Hansen
2015-09-28 19:18 ` [PATCH 20/25] mm, multi-arch: pass a protection key in to calc_vm_flag_bits() Dave Hansen
2015-09-28 19:18 ` [PATCH 21/25] mm: implement new mprotect_key() system call Dave Hansen
2015-09-29  6:39   ` Michael Ellerman
2015-09-29 14:16     ` Dave Hansen
2015-09-28 19:18 ` [PATCH 23/25] x86, pkeys: actually enable Memory Protection Keys in CPU Dave Hansen
2015-09-28 19:18 ` [PATCH 22/25] x86: wire up mprotect_key() system call Dave Hansen
2015-09-28 19:18 ` [PATCH 25/25] x86, pkeys: Documentation Dave Hansen
2015-09-28 20:34   ` Andi Kleen
2015-09-28 20:41     ` Dave Hansen
2015-09-28 19:18 ` [PATCH 24/25] x86, pkeys: add self-tests Dave Hansen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=560D6B06.6040505@sr71.net \
    --to=dave@sr71.net \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox