linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jaewon Kim <jaewon31.kim@samsung.com>
To: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, mgorman@suse.de, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jaewon31.kim@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vmscan: reclaim_clean_pages_from_list() must count mlocked pages
Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2015 23:55:46 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <55BF80F2.2020602@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150803122509.GA29929@bgram>



On 2015e?? 08i?? 03i? 1/4  21:27, Minchan Kim wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 07:18:27PM +0900, Jaewon Kim wrote:
>> reclaim_clean_pages_from_list() decreases NR_ISOLATED_FILE by returned
>> value from shrink_page_list(). But mlocked pages in the isolated
>> clean_pages page list would be removed from the list but not counted as
>> nr_reclaimed. Fix this miscounting by returning the number of mlocked
>> pages and count it.
> 
> If there are pages not able to reclaim, VM try to migrate it and
> have to handle the stat in migrate_pages.
> If migrate_pages fails again, putback-fiends should handle it.
> 
> Is there anyting I am missing now?
> 
> Thanks.
> 
Hello

Only pages in cc->migratepages will be handled by migrate_pages or
putback_movable_pages, and NR_ISOLATED_FILE will be counted properly.
However mlocked pages will not be put back into cc->migratepages,
and also not be counted in NR_ISOLATED_FILE because putback_lru_page
in shrink_page_list does not increase NR_ISOLATED_FILE.
The current reclaim_clean_pages_from_list assumes that shrink_page_list
returns number of pages removed from the candidate list.

i.e)
isolate_migratepages_range    : NR_ISOLATED_FILE += 10
reclaim_clean_pages_from_list : NR_ISOLATED_FILE -= 5 (1 mlocked page)
migrate_pages                 : NR_ISOLATED_FILE -=4
=> NR_ISOLATED_FILE increased by 1

Thank you.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jaewon Kim <jaewon31.kim@samsung.com>
>> ---
>>  mm/vmscan.c | 10 ++++++++--
>>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
>> index 5e8eadd..5837695 100644
>> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
>> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
>> @@ -849,6 +849,7 @@ static unsigned long shrink_page_list(struct list_head *page_list,
>>  				      unsigned long *ret_nr_congested,
>>  				      unsigned long *ret_nr_writeback,
>>  				      unsigned long *ret_nr_immediate,
>> +				      unsigned long *ret_nr_mlocked,
>>  				      bool force_reclaim)
>>  {
>>  	LIST_HEAD(ret_pages);
>> @@ -1158,6 +1159,7 @@ cull_mlocked:
>>  			try_to_free_swap(page);
>>  		unlock_page(page);
>>  		putback_lru_page(page);
>> +		(*ret_nr_mlocked)++;
>>  		continue;
>>  
>>  activate_locked:
>> @@ -1197,6 +1199,7 @@ unsigned long reclaim_clean_pages_from_list(struct zone *zone,
>>  		.may_unmap = 1,
>>  	};
>>  	unsigned long ret, dummy1, dummy2, dummy3, dummy4, dummy5;
>> +	unsigned long nr_mlocked = 0;
>>  	struct page *page, *next;
>>  	LIST_HEAD(clean_pages);
>>  
>> @@ -1210,8 +1213,10 @@ unsigned long reclaim_clean_pages_from_list(struct zone *zone,
>>  
>>  	ret = shrink_page_list(&clean_pages, zone, &sc,
>>  			TTU_UNMAP|TTU_IGNORE_ACCESS,
>> -			&dummy1, &dummy2, &dummy3, &dummy4, &dummy5, true);
>> +			&dummy1, &dummy2, &dummy3, &dummy4, &dummy5,
>> +			&nr_mlocked, true);
>>  	list_splice(&clean_pages, page_list);
>> +	ret += nr_mlocked;
>>  	mod_zone_page_state(zone, NR_ISOLATED_FILE, -ret);
>>  	return ret;
>>  }
>> @@ -1523,6 +1528,7 @@ shrink_inactive_list(unsigned long nr_to_scan, struct lruvec *lruvec,
>>  	unsigned long nr_unqueued_dirty = 0;
>>  	unsigned long nr_writeback = 0;
>>  	unsigned long nr_immediate = 0;
>> +	unsigned long nr_mlocked = 0;
>>  	isolate_mode_t isolate_mode = 0;
>>  	int file = is_file_lru(lru);
>>  	struct zone *zone = lruvec_zone(lruvec);
>> @@ -1565,7 +1571,7 @@ shrink_inactive_list(unsigned long nr_to_scan, struct lruvec *lruvec,
>>  
>>  	nr_reclaimed = shrink_page_list(&page_list, zone, sc, TTU_UNMAP,
>>  				&nr_dirty, &nr_unqueued_dirty, &nr_congested,
>> -				&nr_writeback, &nr_immediate,
>> +				&nr_writeback, &nr_immediate, &nr_mlocked,
>>  				false);
>>  
>>  	spin_lock_irq(&zone->lru_lock);
>> -- 
>> 1.9.1
>>
> 

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2015-08-03 14:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-08-03 10:18 Jaewon Kim
2015-08-03 12:27 ` Minchan Kim
2015-08-03 14:55   ` Jaewon Kim [this message]
2015-08-03 15:33     ` Minchan Kim
2015-08-03 15:46       ` Jaewon Kim
2015-08-03 23:02         ` Minchan Kim

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=55BF80F2.2020602@samsung.com \
    --to=jaewon31.kim@samsung.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jaewon31.kim@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=minchan@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox