* [PATCH] mm:Change unlabeled block of code to a else block in the function dma_pool_free
@ 2015-07-06 23:30 Nicholas Krause
2015-07-07 22:41 ` Andrew Morton
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Nicholas Krause @ 2015-07-06 23:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: akpm; +Cc: khalasa, bigeasy, paulmcquad, linux-mm, linux-kernel
This fixes the unlabeled block of code after the if statement that
executes if the passed dma variable of type dma_addr_t minus the
structure pointer page's dma member is equal to the variable offset
into a else block as this block should run when the if statement check
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Krause <xerofoify@gmail.com>
---
mm/dmapool.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/dmapool.c b/mm/dmapool.c
index fd5fe43..ce7ff4b 100644
--- a/mm/dmapool.c
+++ b/mm/dmapool.c
@@ -434,8 +434,7 @@ void dma_pool_free(struct dma_pool *pool, void *vaddr, dma_addr_t dma)
"dma_pool_free %s, %p (bad vaddr)/%Lx\n",
pool->name, vaddr, (unsigned long long)dma);
return;
- }
- {
+ } else {
unsigned int chain = page->offset;
while (chain < pool->allocation) {
if (chain != offset) {
--
2.1.4
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] mm:Change unlabeled block of code to a else block in the function dma_pool_free
2015-07-06 23:30 [PATCH] mm:Change unlabeled block of code to a else block in the function dma_pool_free Nicholas Krause
@ 2015-07-07 22:41 ` Andrew Morton
2015-07-07 22:51 ` nick
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2015-07-07 22:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nicholas Krause; +Cc: khalasa, bigeasy, paulmcquad, linux-mm, linux-kernel
On Mon, 6 Jul 2015 19:30:31 -0400 Nicholas Krause <xerofoify@gmail.com> wrote:
> This fixes the unlabeled block of code after the if statement that
> executes if the passed dma variable of type dma_addr_t minus the
> structure pointer page's dma member is equal to the variable offset
> into a else block as this block should run when the if statement check
>
> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Krause <xerofoify@gmail.com>
> ---
> mm/dmapool.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/dmapool.c b/mm/dmapool.c
> index fd5fe43..ce7ff4b 100644
> --- a/mm/dmapool.c
> +++ b/mm/dmapool.c
> @@ -434,8 +434,7 @@ void dma_pool_free(struct dma_pool *pool, void *vaddr, dma_addr_t dma)
> "dma_pool_free %s, %p (bad vaddr)/%Lx\n",
> pool->name, vaddr, (unsigned long long)dma);
> return;
> - }
> - {
> + } else {
> unsigned int chain = page->offset;
> while (chain < pool->allocation) {
> if (chain != offset) {
This patch has no effect?
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] mm:Change unlabeled block of code to a else block in the function dma_pool_free
2015-07-07 22:41 ` Andrew Morton
@ 2015-07-07 22:51 ` nick
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: nick @ 2015-07-07 22:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: khalasa, bigeasy, paulmcquad, linux-mm, linux-kernel
On 2015-07-07 06:41 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Jul 2015 19:30:31 -0400 Nicholas Krause <xerofoify@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> This fixes the unlabeled block of code after the if statement that
>> executes if the passed dma variable of type dma_addr_t minus the
>> structure pointer page's dma member is equal to the variable offset
>> into a else block as this block should run when the if statement check
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Krause <xerofoify@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> mm/dmapool.c | 3 +--
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/dmapool.c b/mm/dmapool.c
>> index fd5fe43..ce7ff4b 100644
>> --- a/mm/dmapool.c
>> +++ b/mm/dmapool.c
>> @@ -434,8 +434,7 @@ void dma_pool_free(struct dma_pool *pool, void *vaddr, dma_addr_t dma)
>> "dma_pool_free %s, %p (bad vaddr)/%Lx\n",
>> pool->name, vaddr, (unsigned long long)dma);
>> return;
>> - }
>> - {
>> + } else {
>> unsigned int chain = page->offset;
>> while (chain < pool->allocation) {
>> if (chain != offset) {
>
> This patch has no effect?
>
It's a cleanup as clearly people didn't make this into a if/else statement block as clearly this
needs to run if the if statement fails and making into a else block makes this easier to understand
them a unnamed block. If you prefer we can just remove the brackets creating this block otherwise
that's my reasoning.
Nick
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-07-07 22:51 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-07-06 23:30 [PATCH] mm:Change unlabeled block of code to a else block in the function dma_pool_free Nicholas Krause
2015-07-07 22:41 ` Andrew Morton
2015-07-07 22:51 ` nick
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox