From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Xishi Qiu <qiuxishi@huawei.com>
Cc: ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>,
Wen Congyang <wency@cn.fujitsu.com>,
Tang Chen <tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com>,
Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Jiang Liu <liuj97@gmail.com>,
Vasilis Liaskovitis <vasilis.liaskovitis@profitbricks.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] ACPI / scan: Add second pass of companion offlining to hot-remove code
Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 12:59:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5594351.7bIW5J5bfS@vostro.rjw.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <519B238D.3070900@huawei.com>
On Tuesday, May 21, 2013 03:34:37 PM Xishi Qiu wrote:
> On 2013/5/19 7:34, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> >
> > As indicated by comments in mm/memory_hotplug.c:remove_memory(),
> > if CONFIG_MEMCG is set, it may not be possible to offline all of the
> > memory blocks held by one module (FRU) in one pass (because one of
> > them may be used by the others to store page cgroup in that case
> > and that block has to be offlined before the other ones).
> >
> > To handle that arguably corner case, add a second pass of companion
> > device offlining to acpi_scan_hot_remove() and make it ignore errors
> > returned in the first pass (and make it skip the second pass if the
> > first one is successful).
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/acpi/scan.c | 67 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> > 1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> >
> > Index: linux-pm/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> > +++ linux-pm/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> > @@ -131,6 +131,7 @@ static acpi_status acpi_bus_offline_comp
> > {
> > struct acpi_device *device = NULL;
> > struct acpi_device_physical_node *pn;
> > + bool second_pass = (bool)data;
> > acpi_status status = AE_OK;
> >
> > if (acpi_bus_get_device(handle, &device))
> > @@ -141,15 +142,26 @@ static acpi_status acpi_bus_offline_comp
> > list_for_each_entry(pn, &device->physical_node_list, node) {
> > int ret;
> >
> > + if (second_pass) {
> > + /* Skip devices offlined by the first pass. */
> > + if (pn->put_online)
>
> should it be "if (!pn->put_online)" ?
No, I don't think so.
pn->put_online set means that the device has been offlined by the first pass,
so we don't need to try it in the second one.
Thanks,
Rafael
> > + continue;
> > + } else {
> > + pn->put_online = false;
> > + }
> > ret = device_offline(pn->dev);
> > if (acpi_force_hot_remove)
> > continue;
> >
> > - if (ret < 0) {
> > - status = AE_ERROR;
> > - break;
> > + if (ret >= 0) {
> > + pn->put_online = !ret;
> > + } else {
> > + *ret_p = pn->dev;
> > + if (second_pass) {
> > + status = AE_ERROR;
> > + break;
> > + }
> > }
> > - pn->put_online = !ret;
> > }
> >
> > mutex_unlock(&device->physical_node_lock);
>
>
>
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-21 10:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-18 23:29 [PATCH 0/5] ACPI / scan / memhotplug: ACPI hotplug rework followup changes Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-05-18 23:30 ` [PATCH 1/5] ACPI: Drop removal_type field from struct acpi_device Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-05-18 23:31 ` [PATCH 2/5] ACPI / processor: Pass processor object handle to acpi_bind_one() Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-05-18 23:33 ` [PATCH 3/5] Driver core / MM: Drop offline_memory_block() Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-05-19 1:23 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2013-05-18 23:34 ` [PATCH 4/5] ACPI / scan: Add second pass of companion offlining to hot-remove code Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-05-21 7:34 ` Xishi Qiu
2013-05-21 10:59 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2013-05-18 23:34 ` [PATCH 5/5] ACPI / memhotplug: Drop unnecessary code Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-05-20 17:27 ` Toshi Kani
2013-05-20 19:47 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-05-20 19:55 ` Toshi Kani
2013-05-20 21:31 ` Toshi Kani
2013-05-22 22:09 ` [PATCH *5/5] Memory hotplug / ACPI: Simplify memory removal (was: Re: [PATCH 5/5] ACPI / memhotplug: Drop unnecessary code) Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-05-23 16:45 ` Toshi Kani
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5594351.7bIW5J5bfS@vostro.rjw.lan \
--to=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=liuj97@gmail.com \
--cc=qiuxishi@huawei.com \
--cc=tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=toshi.kani@hp.com \
--cc=vasilis.liaskovitis@profitbricks.com \
--cc=wency@cn.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox