From: Igor Stoppa <igor.stoppa@huawei.com>
To: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>, Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
"kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com"
<kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@google.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Tagging of vmalloc pages for supporting the pmalloc allocator
Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2017 17:13:00 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <555dc453-3028-199a-881a-3ddeb41e4d6d@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170807133107.GA16616@redhat.com>
On 07/08/17 16:31, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 07, 2017 at 02:26:21PM +0300, Igor Stoppa wrote:
[...]
>> I'll add a vm_area field as you advised.
>>
>> Is this something I could send as standalone patch?
>
> Note that vmalloc() is not the only thing that use vmalloc address
> space. There is also vmap() and i know one set of drivers that use
> vmap() and also use the mapping field of struct page namely GPU
> drivers.
Ah, yes, you mentioned this.
> So like i said previously i would store a flag inside vm_struct to
> know if page you are looking at are pmalloc or not.
And I was planning to follow your advice, using one of the flags.
But ...
> Again do you
> need to store something per page ? Would storing it per vm_struct
> not be enough ?
... there was this further comment, about speeding up the access to
vm_area, which seemed good from performance perspective.
---8<--------------8<--------------8<--------------8<--------------8<---
On 03/08/17 14:48, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Thu 03-08-17 13:11:45, Igor Stoppa wrote:
[...]
>> But, to reply more specifically to your advice, yes, I think I could
>> add a flag to vm_struct and then retrieve its value, for the address
>> being processed, by passing through find_vm_area().
>
> ... and you can store vm_struct pointer to the struct page there and
> you won't need to do the slow find_vm_area. I haven't checked very
> closely but this should be possible in principle. I guess other
> callers might benefit from this as well.
---8<--------------8<--------------8<--------------8<--------------8<---
I do not strictly need to modify the page struct, but it seems it might
harm performance, if it is added on the path of hardened usercopy.
I have an updated version of the old proposal:
* put a magic number in the private field, during initialization of
pmalloc pages
* during hardened usercopy verification, when I have to assess if a page
is of pmalloc type, compare the private field against the magic number
* if and only if the private field matches the magic number, then invoke
find_vm_area(), so that the slowness affects only a possibly limited
amount of false positives.
--
igor
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-07 14:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-02 15:14 Igor Stoppa
2017-08-02 17:08 ` Jerome Glisse
2017-08-03 10:11 ` Igor Stoppa
2017-08-03 11:48 ` Michal Hocko
2017-08-03 12:20 ` Igor Stoppa
2017-08-03 13:55 ` Michal Hocko
2017-08-03 14:41 ` Igor Stoppa
2017-08-03 14:47 ` Jerome Glisse
2017-08-03 15:06 ` Igor Stoppa
2017-08-03 15:15 ` Michal Hocko
2017-08-04 8:02 ` Igor Stoppa
2017-08-04 8:12 ` Michal Hocko
2017-08-07 11:26 ` Igor Stoppa
2017-08-07 11:34 ` Michal Hocko
2017-08-07 13:31 ` Jerome Glisse
2017-08-07 14:13 ` Igor Stoppa [this message]
2017-08-07 19:12 ` Jerome Glisse
2017-08-08 12:59 ` Igor Stoppa
2017-08-08 23:15 ` Jerome Glisse
2017-08-09 7:27 ` Igor Stoppa
2017-08-10 7:14 ` Michal Hocko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=555dc453-3028-199a-881a-3ddeb41e4d6d@huawei.com \
--to=igor.stoppa@huawei.com \
--cc=jglisse@redhat.com \
--cc=keescook@google.com \
--cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox