linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
To: Michal Hocko <miso@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Cc: mtk.manpages@gmail.com, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux API <linux-api@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>,
	Eric B Munson <emunson@akamai.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mmap.2: clarify MAP_LOCKED semantic
Date: Thu, 14 May 2015 15:36:06 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5554A4C6.9030306@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1431527892-2996-2-git-send-email-miso@dhcp22.suse.cz>

On 05/13/2015 04:38 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
> 
> MAP_LOCKED had a subtly different semantic from mmap(2)+mlock(2) since
> it has been introduced.
> mlock(2) fails if the memory range cannot get populated to guarantee
> that no future major faults will happen on the range. mmap(MAP_LOCKED) on
> the other hand silently succeeds even if the range was populated only
> partially.
> 
> Fixing this subtle difference in the kernel is rather awkward because
> the memory population happens after mm locks have been dropped and so
> the cleanup before returning failure (munlock) could operate on something
> else than the originally mapped area.
> 
> E.g. speculative userspace page fault handler catching SEGV and doing
> mmap(fault_addr, MAP_FIXED|MAP_LOCKED) might discard portion of a racing
> mmap and lead to lost data. Although it is not clear whether such a
> usage would be valid, mmap page doesn't explicitly describe requirements
> for threaded applications so we cannot exclude this possibility.
> 
> This patch makes the semantic of MAP_LOCKED explicit and suggest using
> mmap + mlock as the only way to guarantee no later major page faults.

Thanks, Michal. Applied, with Reviewed-by: from Eric added.

Cheers,

Michael


> Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
> ---
>  man2/mmap.2 | 13 ++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/man2/mmap.2 b/man2/mmap.2
> index 54d68cf87e9e..1486be2e96b3 100644
> --- a/man2/mmap.2
> +++ b/man2/mmap.2
> @@ -235,8 +235,19 @@ See the Linux kernel source file
>  for further information.
>  .TP
>  .BR MAP_LOCKED " (since Linux 2.5.37)"
> -Lock the pages of the mapped region into memory in the manner of
> +Mark the mmaped region to be locked in the same way as
>  .BR mlock (2).
> +This implementation will try to populate (prefault) the whole range but
> +the mmap call doesn't fail with
> +.B ENOMEM
> +if this fails. Therefore major faults might happen later on. So the semantic
> +is not as strong as
> +.BR mlock (2).
> +.BR mmap (2)
> ++
> +.BR mlock (2)
> +should be used when major faults are not acceptable after the initialization
> +of the mapping.
>  This flag is ignored in older kernels.
>  .\" If set, the mapped pages will not be swapped out.
>  .TP
> 


-- 
Michael Kerrisk
Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/
Linux/UNIX System Programming Training: http://man7.org/training/

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-05-14 13:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-05-13 14:38 [PATCH 0/2] man-pages: " Michal Hocko
2015-05-13 14:38 ` [PATCH 1/2] mmap.2: " Michal Hocko
2015-05-13 14:45   ` Eric B Munson
2015-05-13 14:48     ` Eric B Munson
2015-05-14  8:01     ` Michal Hocko
2015-05-14 13:36   ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) [this message]
2016-05-11 11:07   ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-05-11 11:18     ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-05-11 11:32     ` Michal Hocko
2015-05-13 14:38 ` [PATCH 2/2] mmap2: clarify MAP_POPULATE Michal Hocko
2015-05-13 14:47   ` Eric B Munson
2015-05-14 13:36   ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2015-05-15  0:13   ` David Rientjes
2015-05-18  9:12 ` [PATCH 0/2] man-pages: clarify MAP_LOCKED semantic Michal Hocko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5554A4C6.9030306@gmail.com \
    --to=mtk.manpages@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=emunson@akamai.com \
    --cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
    --cc=miso@dhcp22.suse.cz \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox