From: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, will.deacon@arm.com,
catalin.marinas@arm.com
Cc: mhocko@suse.com, mgorman@techsingularity.net,
james.morse@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com,
cpandya@codeaurora.org, arunks@codeaurora.org,
dan.j.williams@intel.com, osalvador@suse.de, logang@deltatee.com,
pasha.tatashin@oracle.com, david@redhat.com, cai@lca.pw,
Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] arm64/mm: Enable memory hot remove
Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2019 11:09:22 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55278a57-39bc-be27-5999-81d0da37b746@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ed4ceac4-b92c-47f4-33b0-ed1d0833b40d@arm.com>
On 04/03/2019 06:07 PM, Robin Murphy wrote:
> [ +Steve ]
>
> Hi Anshuman,
>
> On 03/04/2019 05:30, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>> Memory removal from an arch perspective involves tearing down two different
>> kernel based mappings i.e vmemmap and linear while releasing related page
>> table pages allocated for the physical memory range to be removed.
>>
>> Define a common kernel page table tear down helper remove_pagetable() which
>> can be used to unmap given kernel virtual address range. In effect it can
>> tear down both vmemap or kernel linear mappings. This new helper is called
>> from both vmemamp_free() and ___remove_pgd_mapping() during memory removal.
>> The argument 'direct' here identifies kernel linear mappings.
>>
>> Vmemmap mappings page table pages are allocated through sparse mem helper
>> functions like vmemmap_alloc_block() which does not cycle the pages through
>> pgtable_page_ctor() constructs. Hence while removing it skips corresponding
>> destructor construct pgtable_page_dtor().
>>
>> While here update arch_add_mempory() to handle __add_pages() failures by
>> just unmapping recently added kernel linear mapping. Now enable memory hot
>> remove on arm64 platforms by default with ARCH_ENABLE_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE.
>>
>> This implementation is overall inspired from kernel page table tear down
>> procedure on X86 architecture.
>
> A bit of a nit, but since this depends on at least patch #4 to work properly, it would be good to reorder the series appropriately.
Sure will move up the generic changes forward.
>> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/Kconfig | 3 +
>> arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h | 14 +++
>> arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c | 227 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>> 3 files changed, 241 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
>> index a2418fb..db3e625 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
>> @@ -266,6 +266,9 @@ config HAVE_GENERIC_GUP
>> config ARCH_ENABLE_MEMORY_HOTPLUG
>> def_bool y
>> +config ARCH_ENABLE_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE
>> + def_bool y
>> +
>> config ARCH_MEMORY_PROBE
>> bool "Enable /sys/devices/system/memory/probe interface"
>> depends on MEMORY_HOTPLUG
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
>> index de70c1e..858098e 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
>> @@ -355,6 +355,18 @@ static inline int pmd_protnone(pmd_t pmd)
>> }
>> #endif
>> +#if (CONFIG_PGTABLE_LEVELS > 2)
>> +#define pmd_large(pmd) (pmd_val(pmd) && !(pmd_val(pmd) & PMD_TABLE_BIT))
>> +#else
>> +#define pmd_large(pmd) 0
>> +#endif
>> +
>> +#if (CONFIG_PGTABLE_LEVELS > 3)
>> +#define pud_large(pud) (pud_val(pud) && !(pud_val(pud) & PUD_TABLE_BIT))
>> +#else
>> +#define pud_large(pmd) 0
>> +#endif
>
> These seem rather different from the versions that Steve is proposing in the generic pagewalk series - can you reach an agreement on which implementation is preferred?
Sure will take a look.
>
>> +
>> /*
>> * THP definitions.
>> */
>> @@ -555,6 +567,7 @@ static inline phys_addr_t pud_page_paddr(pud_t pud)
>> #else
>> +#define pmd_index(addr) 0
>> #define pud_page_paddr(pud) ({ BUILD_BUG(); 0; })
>> /* Match pmd_offset folding in <asm/generic/pgtable-nopmd.h> */
>> @@ -612,6 +625,7 @@ static inline phys_addr_t pgd_page_paddr(pgd_t pgd)
>> #else
>> +#define pud_index(adrr) 0
>> #define pgd_page_paddr(pgd) ({ BUILD_BUG(); 0;})
>> /* Match pud_offset folding in <asm/generic/pgtable-nopud.h> */
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
>> index e97f018..ae0777b 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
>> @@ -714,6 +714,198 @@ int kern_addr_valid(unsigned long addr)
>> return pfn_valid(pte_pfn(pte));
>> }
>> +
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG
>> +static void __meminit free_pagetable(struct page *page, int order)
>
> Do these need to be __meminit? AFAICS it's effectively redundant with the containing #ifdef, and removal feels like it's inherently a later-than-init thing anyway.
I was confused here a bit but even X86 does exactly the same. All these functions
are still labeled __meminit and all wrapped under CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG. Is there
any concern to have __meminit here ?
>
>> +{
>> + unsigned long magic;
>> + unsigned int nr_pages = 1 << order;
>> +
>> + if (PageReserved(page)) {
>> + __ClearPageReserved(page);
>> +
>> + magic = (unsigned long)page->freelist;
>> + if (magic == SECTION_INFO || magic == MIX_SECTION_INFO) {
>> + while (nr_pages--)
>> + put_page_bootmem(page++);
>> + } else
>> + while (nr_pages--)
>> + free_reserved_page(page++);
>> + } else
>> + free_pages((unsigned long)page_address(page), order);
>> +}
>> +
>> +#if (CONFIG_PGTABLE_LEVELS > 2)
>> +static void __meminit free_pte_table(pte_t *pte_start, pmd_t *pmd, bool direct)
>> +{
>> + pte_t *pte;
>> + int i;
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < PTRS_PER_PTE; i++) {
>> + pte = pte_start + i;
>> + if (!pte_none(*pte))
>> + return;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (direct)
>> + pgtable_page_dtor(pmd_page(*pmd));
>> + free_pagetable(pmd_page(*pmd), 0);
>> + spin_lock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
>> + pmd_clear(pmd);
>> + spin_unlock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
>> +}
>> +#else
>> +static void __meminit free_pte_table(pte_t *pte_start, pmd_t *pmd, bool direct)
>> +{
>> +}
>> +#endif
>> +
>> +#if (CONFIG_PGTABLE_LEVELS > 3)
>> +static void __meminit free_pmd_table(pmd_t *pmd_start, pud_t *pud, bool direct)
>> +{
>> + pmd_t *pmd;
>> + int i;
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < PTRS_PER_PMD; i++) {
>> + pmd = pmd_start + i;
>> + if (!pmd_none(*pmd))
>> + return;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (direct)
>> + pgtable_page_dtor(pud_page(*pud));
>> + free_pagetable(pud_page(*pud), 0);
>> + spin_lock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
>> + pud_clear(pud);
>> + spin_unlock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void __meminit free_pud_table(pud_t *pud_start, pgd_t *pgd, bool direct)
>> +{
>> + pud_t *pud;
>> + int i;
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < PTRS_PER_PUD; i++) {
>> + pud = pud_start + i;
>> + if (!pud_none(*pud))
>> + return;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (direct)
>> + pgtable_page_dtor(pgd_page(*pgd));
>> + free_pagetable(pgd_page(*pgd), 0);
>> + spin_lock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
>> + pgd_clear(pgd);
>> + spin_unlock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
>> +}
>> +#else
>> +static void __meminit free_pmd_table(pmd_t *pmd_start, pud_t *pud, bool direct)
>> +{
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void __meminit free_pud_table(pud_t *pud_start, pgd_t *pgd, bool direct)
>> +{
>> +}
>> +#endif
>> +
>> +static void __meminit
>> +remove_pte_table(pte_t *pte_start, unsigned long addr,
>> + unsigned long end, bool direct)
>> +{
>> + pte_t *pte;
>> +
>> + pte = pte_start + pte_index(addr);
>> + for (; addr < end; addr += PAGE_SIZE, pte++) {
>> + if (!pte_present(*pte))
>> + continue;
>> +
>> + if (!direct)
>> + free_pagetable(pte_page(*pte), 0);
>> + spin_lock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
>> + pte_clear(&init_mm, addr, pte);
>> + spin_unlock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
>> + }
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void __meminit
>> +remove_pmd_table(pmd_t *pmd_start, unsigned long addr,
>> + unsigned long end, bool direct)
>> +{
>> + unsigned long next;
>> + pte_t *pte_base;
>> + pmd_t *pmd;
>> +
>> + pmd = pmd_start + pmd_index(addr);
>> + for (; addr < end; addr = next, pmd++) {
>> + next = pmd_addr_end(addr, end);
>> + if (!pmd_present(*pmd))
>> + continue;
>> +
>> + if (pmd_large(*pmd)) {
>> + if (!direct)
>> + free_pagetable(pmd_page(*pmd),
>> + get_order(PMD_SIZE));
>> + spin_lock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
>> + pmd_clear(pmd);
>> + spin_unlock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
>> + continue;
>> + }
>> + pte_base = pte_offset_kernel(pmd, 0UL);
>> + remove_pte_table(pte_base, addr, next, direct);
>> + free_pte_table(pte_base, pmd, direct);
>> + }
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void __meminit
>> +remove_pud_table(pud_t *pud_start, unsigned long addr,
>> + unsigned long end, bool direct)
>> +{
>> + unsigned long next;
>> + pmd_t *pmd_base;
>> + pud_t *pud;
>> +
>> + pud = pud_start + pud_index(addr);
>> + for (; addr < end; addr = next, pud++) {
>> + next = pud_addr_end(addr, end);
>> + if (!pud_present(*pud))
>> + continue;
>> +
>> + if (pud_large(*pud)) {
>> + if (!direct)
>> + free_pagetable(pud_page(*pud),
>> + get_order(PUD_SIZE));
>> + spin_lock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
>> + pud_clear(pud);
>> + spin_unlock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
>> + continue;
>> + }
>> + pmd_base = pmd_offset(pud, 0UL);
>> + remove_pmd_table(pmd_base, addr, next, direct);
>> + free_pmd_table(pmd_base, pud, direct);
>> + }
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void __meminit
>> +remove_pagetable(unsigned long start, unsigned long end, bool direct)
>> +{
>> + unsigned long addr, next;
>> + pud_t *pud_base;
>> + pgd_t *pgd;
>> +
>> + for (addr = start; addr < end; addr = next) {
>> + next = pgd_addr_end(addr, end);
>> + pgd = pgd_offset_k(addr);
>> + if (!pgd_present(*pgd))
>> + continue;
>> +
>> + pud_base = pud_offset(pgd, 0UL);
>> + remove_pud_table(pud_base, addr, next, direct);
>> + free_pud_table(pud_base, pgd, direct);
>> + }
>> + flush_tlb_kernel_range(start, end);
>> +}
>> +#endif
>> +
>> #ifdef CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP
>> #if !ARM64_SWAPPER_USES_SECTION_MAPS
>> int __meminit vmemmap_populate(unsigned long start, unsigned long end, int node,
>> @@ -758,9 +950,12 @@ int __meminit vmemmap_populate(unsigned long start, unsigned long end, int node,
>> return 0;
>> }
>> #endif /* CONFIG_ARM64_64K_PAGES */
>> -void vmemmap_free(unsigned long start, unsigned long end,
>> +void __ref vmemmap_free(unsigned long start, unsigned long end,
>
> Why is the __ref needed? Presumably it's avoidable by addressing the __meminit thing above.
Right.
>
>> struct vmem_altmap *altmap)
>> {
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG
>> + remove_pagetable(start, end, false);
>> +#endif
>> }
>> #endif /* CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP */
>> @@ -1046,10 +1241,16 @@ int p4d_free_pud_page(p4d_t *p4d, unsigned long addr)
>> }
>> #ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG
>> +static void __remove_pgd_mapping(pgd_t *pgdir, unsigned long start, u64 size)
>> +{
>> + WARN_ON(pgdir != init_mm.pgd);
>> + remove_pagetable(start, start + size, true);
>> +}
>> +
>> int arch_add_memory(int nid, u64 start, u64 size, struct vmem_altmap *altmap,
>> bool want_memblock)
>> {
>> - int flags = 0;
>> + int flags = 0, ret = 0;
>
> Initialising ret here is unnecessary.
Sure. Will change.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-04 5:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-03 4:30 [PATCH 0/6] arm64/mm: Enable memory hot remove and ZONE_DEVICE Anshuman Khandual
2019-04-03 4:30 ` [PATCH 1/6] arm64/mm: Enable sysfs based memory hot add interface Anshuman Khandual
2019-04-03 8:20 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-04-03 13:12 ` Robin Murphy
2019-04-04 5:21 ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-04-04 5:25 ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-04-04 8:49 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-04-03 4:30 ` [PATCH 2/6] arm64/mm: Enable memory hot remove Anshuman Khandual
2019-04-03 12:37 ` Robin Murphy
2019-04-03 13:15 ` Steven Price
2019-04-04 6:51 ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-04-04 5:39 ` Anshuman Khandual [this message]
2019-04-04 11:58 ` Oscar Salvador
2019-04-04 13:03 ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-04-04 15:19 ` Oscar Salvador
2019-04-03 17:32 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2019-04-03 17:57 ` Robin Murphy
2019-04-04 8:23 ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-04-04 7:07 ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-04-04 9:16 ` Steven Price
2019-04-03 4:30 ` [PATCH 3/6] arm64/mm: Enable struct page allocation from device memory Anshuman Khandual
2019-04-03 4:30 ` [PATCH 4/6] mm/hotplug: Reorder arch_remove_memory() call in __remove_memory() Anshuman Khandual
2019-04-03 8:45 ` Oscar Salvador
2019-04-03 9:17 ` Michal Hocko
2019-04-04 8:32 ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-04-03 9:30 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-04-03 4:30 ` [PATCH 5/6] mm/memremap: Rename and consolidate SECTION_SIZE Anshuman Khandual
2019-04-03 9:26 ` Michal Hocko
2019-04-03 9:30 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-04-03 4:30 ` [PATCH 6/6] arm64/mm: Enable ZONE_DEVICE Anshuman Khandual
2019-04-03 13:58 ` Robin Murphy
2019-04-03 16:07 ` Jerome Glisse
2019-04-04 5:03 ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-04-04 4:42 ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-04-04 5:04 ` Dan Williams
2019-04-04 9:46 ` Robin Murphy
2019-04-07 22:11 ` Dan Williams
2019-04-08 4:03 ` Ira Weiny
2019-04-08 6:03 ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-04-03 18:08 ` [PATCH 0/6] arm64/mm: Enable memory hot remove and ZONE_DEVICE Dan Williams
2019-04-04 13:11 ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-04-04 9:46 ` [RFC 1/2] mm/vmemmap: Enable vmem_altmap based base page mapping for vmemmap Anshuman Khandual
2019-04-04 9:46 ` [RFC 2/2] arm64/mm: Enable ZONE_DEVICE for all page configs Anshuman Khandual
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55278a57-39bc-be27-5999-81d0da37b746@arm.com \
--to=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arunks@codeaurora.org \
--cc=cai@lca.pw \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=cpandya@codeaurora.org \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=logang@deltatee.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=pasha.tatashin@oracle.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=steven.price@arm.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox