From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
To: Andrey Korolyov <andrey@xdel.ru>, jesper@krogh.cc
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
Christian Marie <christian@ponies.io>
Subject: Re: High system load and 3TB of memory.
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2015 15:15:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5509889C.2080602@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABYiri9BcgNEYD5C4qGf=3q6a=d549Rp9rXD7BAo8NkVDAPOqA@mail.gmail.com>
On 03/14/2015 06:33 PM, Andrey Korolyov wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 8:25 PM, <jesper@krogh.cc> wrote:
>>> On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 8:05 PM, <jesper@krogh.cc> wrote:
>>>> Hi
>>>> I have a 3.13 (ubuntu LTS) server with 3TB of memory and under certain
>>>> load
>>>> conditions it can spiral off to 80+% system load. Per recommendation on
>>>> IRC
>>>> yesterday I have captured 2 perf reports (I'm new to perf, so I'm not
>>>> sure they tell precisely whats needed.
>>>>
>>>> Bad situation (high sysload 80%+)
>>
>>
>>> Hi Jesper, please take a look on
>>> http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=141605213522925&w=2, there is a long
>>> and unfinished discussion as it seems very problematic to make a
>>> deterministic reproduction of the bug in our environments. If you can
>>> observe same lockups with more ease, it`ll help a lot in the issue
>>> pinning and fixing.
>>
>>
>> Hi Andrey.
>>
>> Yes it looks indeed familiar. I can do a fair amount of testing and our
>> normal production load triggers the problem 6-10 times per day and I'm
>> willing to garther data to help move forward. What do you suggest is next?
>>
>> Jesper
>>
>>
>
> There is a couple of patches suggested by Vlastimil and others through
> discussion, not me neither Christian was able to test them properly
> due to kind of environment where bug primarily live (production envs
> for both of us). The bare test-env reproducer is a big step forward
> indeed. Since then bug was reported a couple of times and workarounded
> (by setting ridiculously large amount of memory for vm.min_free), the
> larger memory room is (given intensive disk i/o which is able to fill
> all memory with certain ratio of active/inactive pages I suppose), the
> easier it is to catch the issue.
Right, it would be great if you could try it with 3.18+ kernel and
possibly Joonsoo's patch from
http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=141774145601066
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-18 14:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-14 17:05 jesper
2015-03-14 17:14 ` Andrey Korolyov
2015-03-14 17:25 ` jesper
2015-03-14 17:33 ` Andrey Korolyov
2015-03-18 14:15 ` Vlastimil Babka [this message]
2015-03-18 15:14 ` Jesper Krogh
2015-03-19 12:51 ` Joonsoo Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5509889C.2080602@suse.cz \
--to=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=andrey@xdel.ru \
--cc=christian@ponies.io \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=jesper@krogh.cc \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox