From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE9ADC6369E for ; Thu, 3 Dec 2020 03:13:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F164322201 for ; Thu, 3 Dec 2020 03:13:39 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org F164322201 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=hisilicon.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 6B3696B005D; Wed, 2 Dec 2020 22:13:39 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 662716B0068; Wed, 2 Dec 2020 22:13:39 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 5A0E86B006C; Wed, 2 Dec 2020 22:13:39 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0107.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.107]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 458936B005D for ; Wed, 2 Dec 2020 22:13:39 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin08.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay02.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0019362D for ; Thu, 3 Dec 2020 03:13:38 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 77550500916.08.coat29_1d0fe74273b8 Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (10.5.16.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.16.251]) by smtpin08.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D18581819E798 for ; Thu, 3 Dec 2020 03:13:38 +0000 (UTC) X-HE-Tag: coat29_1d0fe74273b8 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 2866 Received: from szxga07-in.huawei.com (szxga07-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.35]) by imf30.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Thu, 3 Dec 2020 03:13:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from DGGEMS402-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.60]) by szxga07-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4CmgrD24JGz77Sk; Thu, 3 Dec 2020 11:12:44 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.143.60.252] (10.143.60.252) by DGGEMS402-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.202) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.487.0; Thu, 3 Dec 2020 11:13:03 +0800 Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] mm: vmscan: use nid from shrink_control for tracepoint To: Yang Shi , , , , , , , CC: , , , Liu Yi References: <20201202182725.265020-1-shy828301@gmail.com> <20201202182725.265020-3-shy828301@gmail.com> From: "Xiaqing (A)" Message-ID: <550518d6-fd50-72be-7c84-71153b470cfd@hisilicon.com> Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2020 11:13:03 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20201202182725.265020-3-shy828301@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US X-Originating-IP: [10.143.60.252] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On 2020/12/3 2:27, Yang Shi wrote: > The tracepoint's nid should show what node the shrink happens on, the s= tart tracepoint > uses nid from shrinkctl, but the nid might be set to 0 before end trace= point if the > shrinker is not NUMA aware, so the traceing log may show the shrink hap= pens on one > node but end up on the other node. It seems confusing. And the follow= ing patch > will remove using nid directly in do_shrink_slab(), this patch also hel= ps cleanup > the code. > > Signed-off-by: Yang Shi > --- > mm/vmscan.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c > index 7d6186a07daf..457ce04eebf2 100644 > --- a/mm/vmscan.c > +++ b/mm/vmscan.c > @@ -533,7 +533,7 @@ static unsigned long do_shrink_slab(struct shrink_c= ontrol *shrinkctl, > new_nr =3D atomic_long_add_return(next_deferred, > &shrinker->nr_deferred[nid]); > =20 > - trace_mm_shrink_slab_end(shrinker, nid, freed, nr, new_nr, total_scan= ); > + trace_mm_shrink_slab_end(shrinker, shrinkctl->nid, freed, nr, new_nr,= total_scan); Hi=EF=BC=8C Yang When I read this patch, I wondered why you modified it so much until I re= ad patch6. Could you merge this patch into patch6? Thanks! > return freed; > } > =20