linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>,
	David Gow <davidgow@google.com>,
	damon@lists.linux.dev, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	kunit-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/damon/tests/vaddr-kunit: don't use mas_lock for MM_MT_FLAGS-initialized maple tree
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2024 23:36:41 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54zu64vxrhdxr4wtmwbewga44shu4f7lz4ffx2hxhag46b56hn@qgrgfrb6mhbv> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e83dedb2-89a3-4327-9a2f-610d3199f0e1@roeck-us.net>

* Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> [240903 22:38]:
> On 9/3/24 19:31, Liam R. Howlett wrote:
> > * SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org> [240903 21:18]:
> > > On Tue,  3 Sep 2024 17:58:15 -0700 SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > On Tue, 3 Sep 2024 20:48:53 -0400 "Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com> wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > > * SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org> [240903 20:45]:
> > > > > > damon_test_three_regions_in_vmas() initializes a maple tree with
> > > > > > MM_MT_FLAGS.  The flags contains MT_FLAGS_LOCK_EXTERN, which means
> > > > > > mt_lock of the maple tree will not be used.  And therefore the maple
> > > > > > tree initialization code skips initialization of the mt_lock.  However,
> > > > > > __link_vmas(), which adds vmas for test to the maple tree, uses the
> > > > > > mt_lock.  In other words, the uninitialized spinlock is used.  The
> > > > > > problem becomes celar when spinlock debugging is turned on, since it
> > > > > > reports spinlock bad magic bug.  Fix the issue by not using the mt_lock
> > > > > > as promised.
> > > > > 
> > > > > You can't do this, lockdep will tell you this is wrong.
> > > > 
> > > > Hmm, but lockdep was silence on my setup?
> > > > 
> > > > > We need a lock and to use the lock for writes.
> > > > 
> > > > This code is executed by a single-thread test code.  Do we still need the lock?
> > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > I'd suggest using different flags so the spinlock is used.
> > > > 
> > > > The reporter mentioned simply dropping MT_FLAGS_LOCK_EXTERN from the flags
> > > > causes suspicious RCU usage message.  May I ask if you have a suggestion of
> > > > better flags?
> > 
> > That would be the lockdep complaining, so that's good.
> > 
> > > 
> > > I was actually thinking replacing the mt_init_flags() with mt_init(), which
> > > same to mt_init_flags() with zero flag, like below.
> > 
> > Yes.  This will use the spinlock which should fix your issue, but it
> > will use a different style of maple tree.
> > 
> > Perhaps use MT_FLAGS_ALLOC_RANGE to use the same type of maple tree, if
> > you ever add threading you will want the rcu flag as well
> > (MT_FLAGS_USE_RCU).
> > 
> > I would recommend those two and just use the spinlock.
> > 
> 
> I tried that (MT_FLAGS_ALLOC_RANGE | MT_FLAGS_USE_RCU). it also triggers
> the suspicious RCU usage message.
> 

I am running ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run '*damon*' --arch x86_64 --raw 
with:
CONFIG_LOCKDEP=y
CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK=y

and I don't have any issue with locking in the existing code.  How do I
recreate this issue?

Thanks,
Liam



  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-09-04  3:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-09-04  0:45 SeongJae Park
2024-09-04  0:48 ` Liam R. Howlett
2024-09-04  0:58   ` SeongJae Park
2024-09-04  1:18     ` SeongJae Park
2024-09-04  1:54       ` Guenter Roeck
2024-09-04  2:43         ` Liam R. Howlett
2024-09-04 17:36           ` SeongJae Park
2024-09-04  2:31       ` Liam R. Howlett
2024-09-04  2:38         ` Guenter Roeck
2024-09-04  2:46           ` Liam R. Howlett
2024-09-04  3:36           ` Liam R. Howlett [this message]
2024-09-04  4:27             ` Guenter Roeck
2024-09-04 19:26               ` Liam R. Howlett
2024-09-04 19:56                 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-09-05  0:19                   ` SeongJae Park
2024-09-04 16:58             ` Guenter Roeck
2024-09-04  1:28     ` Guenter Roeck

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=54zu64vxrhdxr4wtmwbewga44shu4f7lz4ffx2hxhag46b56hn@qgrgfrb6mhbv \
    --to=liam.howlett@oracle.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=brendanhiggins@google.com \
    --cc=damon@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=davidgow@google.com \
    --cc=kunit-dev@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --cc=sj@kernel.org \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox