linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrey Ryabinin <a.ryabinin@samsung.com>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kasan, module, vmalloc: rework shadow allocation for modules
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 10:47:16 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54E6E684.4070806@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87fva1sajo.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>

On 02/20/2015 03:15 AM, Rusty Russell wrote:
> Andrey Ryabinin <a.ryabinin@samsung.com> writes:
>> On 02/19/2015 02:10 AM, Rusty Russell wrote:
>>> This is not portable.  Other archs don't use vmalloc, or don't use
>>> (or define) MODULES_VADDR.  If you really want to hook here, you'd
>>> need a new flag (or maybe use PAGE_KERNEL_EXEC after an audit).
>>>
>>
>> Well, instead of explicit (addr >= MODULES_VADDR && addr < MODULES_END)
>> I could hide this into arch-specific function: 'kasan_need_to_allocate_shadow(const void *addr)'
>> or make make all those functions weak and allow arch code to redefine them.
> 
> That adds another layer of indirection.  And how would the caller of
> plain vmalloc() even know what to return?
> 

I think I don't understand what do you mean here. vmalloc() callers shouldn't know
anything about kasan/shadow.

You were concerned that this patch is not portable, so I suggested to hide arch specific
part in arch code. That's it.

>>> Thus I think modifying the callers is the better choice.
>>>
>>
>> I could suggest following (though, I still prefer 'modifying vmalloc' approach):
>>   * In do_init_module(), instead of call_rcu(&freeinit->rcu, do_free_init);
>>     use synchronyze_rcu() + module_memfree(). Of course this will be
>>   under CONFIG_KASAN.
> 
> But it would be slow, and a disparate code path, which is usually a bad
> idea.
> 
>>     As you said there other module_memfree() users, so what if they will decide
>>     to free memory in atomic context?
> 
> Hmm, how about a hybrid:
> 
> 1) Add kasan_module_alloc(p, size) after module alloc as your original.
> 2) Hook into vfree(), and ignore it if you can't find the map.
> 

That should work, but it looks messy IMO.

> Or is the latter too expensive?
> 

Not sure whether this will be too expensive or not,
but definitely more expensive than simple (addr >= MODULES_VADDR && addr < MODULES_END) check.


--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2015-02-20  7:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-02-18 17:44 Andrey Ryabinin
2015-02-18 23:10 ` Rusty Russell
2015-02-19 13:21   ` Andrey Ryabinin
2015-02-20  0:15     ` Rusty Russell
2015-02-20  7:47       ` Andrey Ryabinin [this message]
2015-02-23  8:26         ` Rusty Russell
2015-02-24 12:58           ` Andrey Ryabinin
2015-02-25  6:25             ` Rusty Russell
2015-02-25  7:56               ` Andrey Ryabinin
2015-02-26  1:30                 ` Rusty Russell
2015-02-27 12:20                   ` Andrey Ryabinin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=54E6E684.4070806@samsung.com \
    --to=a.ryabinin@samsung.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dvyukov@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox