From: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
To: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, hughd@google.com, david@redhat.com,
lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com, Liam.Howlett@oracle.com,
npache@redhat.com, ryan.roberts@arm.com, dev.jain@arm.com,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mm: shmem: disallow hugepages if the system-wide shmem THP sysfs settings are disabled
Date: Thu, 29 May 2025 22:35:43 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <548AFF46-93AF-40CB-80E4-372DAAA9F80B@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6132583a-1754-4eb1-9b84-19b55cac176c@linux.alibaba.com>
On 29 May 2025, at 22:32, Baolin Wang wrote:
> On 2025/5/30 10:17, Zi Yan wrote:
>> On 29 May 2025, at 21:58, Baolin Wang wrote:
>>
>>> On 2025/5/29 23:21, Zi Yan wrote:
>>>> On 29 May 2025, at 4:23, Baolin Wang wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> The MADV_COLLAPSE will ignore the system-wide shmem THP sysfs settings, which
>>>>> means that even though we have disabled the shmem THP configuration, MADV_COLLAPSE
>>>>> will still attempt to collapse into a shmem THP. This violates the rule we have
>>>>> agreed upon: never means never.
>>>>>
>>>>> Then the current strategy is:
>>>>> For shmem, if none of always, madvise, within_size, and inherit have enabled
>>>>> PMD-sized mTHP, then MADV_COLLAPSE will be prohibited from collapsing PMD-sized mTHP.
>>>>>
>>>>> For tmpfs, if the mount option is set with the 'huge=never' parameter, then
>>>>> MADV_COLLAPSE will be prohibited from collapsing PMD-sized mTHP.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> mm/huge_memory.c | 2 +-
>>>>> mm/shmem.c | 12 ++++++------
>>>>> 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
>>>>> index d3e66136e41a..a8cfa37cae72 100644
>>>>> --- a/mm/huge_memory.c
>>>>> +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
>>>>> @@ -166,7 +166,7 @@ unsigned long __thp_vma_allowable_orders(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>>>>> * own flags.
>>>>> */
>>>>> if (!in_pf && shmem_file(vma->vm_file))
>>>>> - return shmem_allowable_huge_orders(file_inode(vma->vm_file),
>>>>> + return orders & shmem_allowable_huge_orders(file_inode(vma->vm_file),
>>>>> vma, vma->vm_pgoff, 0,
>>>>> !enforce_sysfs);
>>>>
>>>> OK, here orders is checked against allowed orders.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/mm/shmem.c b/mm/shmem.c
>>>>> index 4b42419ce6b2..4dbb28d85cd9 100644
>>>>> --- a/mm/shmem.c
>>>>> +++ b/mm/shmem.c
>>>>> @@ -613,7 +613,7 @@ static unsigned int shmem_get_orders_within_size(struct inode *inode,
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> static unsigned int shmem_huge_global_enabled(struct inode *inode, pgoff_t index,
>>>>> - loff_t write_end, bool shmem_huge_force,
>>>>> + loff_t write_end,
>>>>> struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>>>>> unsigned long vm_flags)
>>>>> {
>>>>> @@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ static unsigned int shmem_huge_global_enabled(struct inode *inode, pgoff_t index
>>>>> return 0;
>>>>> if (shmem_huge == SHMEM_HUGE_DENY)
>>>>> return 0;
>>>>> - if (shmem_huge_force || shmem_huge == SHMEM_HUGE_FORCE)
>>>>> + if (shmem_huge == SHMEM_HUGE_FORCE)
>>>>> return maybe_pmd_order;
>>>>
>>>> shmem_huge is set by sysfs?
>>>
>>> Yes, through the '/sys/kernel/mm/transparent_hugepage/shmem_enabled' interface.
>>>
>>>>> /*
>>>>> @@ -860,7 +860,7 @@ static unsigned long shmem_unused_huge_shrink(struct shmem_sb_info *sbinfo,
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> static unsigned int shmem_huge_global_enabled(struct inode *inode, pgoff_t index,
>>>>> - loff_t write_end, bool shmem_huge_force,
>>>>> + loff_t write_end,
>>>>> struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>>>>> unsigned long vm_flags)
>>>>> {
>>>>> @@ -1261,7 +1261,7 @@ static int shmem_getattr(struct mnt_idmap *idmap,
>>>>> STATX_ATTR_NODUMP);
>>>>> generic_fillattr(idmap, request_mask, inode, stat);
>>>>>
>>>>> - if (shmem_huge_global_enabled(inode, 0, 0, false, NULL, 0))
>>>>> + if (shmem_huge_global_enabled(inode, 0, 0, NULL, 0))
>>>>> stat->blksize = HPAGE_PMD_SIZE;
>>>>>
>>>>> if (request_mask & STATX_BTIME) {
>>>>> @@ -1768,7 +1768,7 @@ unsigned long shmem_allowable_huge_orders(struct inode *inode,
>>>>> return 0;
>>>>>
>>>>> global_orders = shmem_huge_global_enabled(inode, index, write_end,
>>>>> - shmem_huge_force, vma, vm_flags);
>>>>> + vma, vm_flags);
>>>>> /* Tmpfs huge pages allocation */
>>>>> if (!vma || !vma_is_anon_shmem(vma))
>>>>> return global_orders;
>>>>> @@ -1790,7 +1790,7 @@ unsigned long shmem_allowable_huge_orders(struct inode *inode,
>>>>> /* Allow mTHP that will be fully within i_size. */
>>>>> mask |= shmem_get_orders_within_size(inode, within_size_orders, index, 0);
>>>>>
>>>>> - if (vm_flags & VM_HUGEPAGE)
>>>>> + if (shmem_huge_force || (vm_flags & VM_HUGEPAGE))
>>>>> mask |= READ_ONCE(huge_shmem_orders_madvise);
>>>>>
>>>>> if (global_orders > 0)
>>>>> --
>>>>> 2.43.5
>>>>
>>>> shmem_huge_force comes from !enforce_sysfs in __thp_vma_allowable_orders().
>>>> Do you know when sysfs is not enforced and why?
>>>
>>> IIUC, shmem_huge_force will only be set during MADV_COLLAPSE. Originally, MADV_COLLAPSE was intended to ignore the system-wide THP sysfs settings. However, if all system-wide shmem THP settings are disabled, we should not allow MADV_COLLAPSE to collapse a THP. This is the issue this patchset aims to fix. Thanks for the review.
>>
>> Got it. If we want to enforce sysfs, why not just get rid of TVA_ENFORCE_SYSFS
>> and make everyone follow sysfs?
>
> Now MADV_COLLAPSE will ignore the VM_HUGEPAGE, while the others will check the VM_HUGEPAGE flag before using 'huge_shmem_orders_madvise' with the TVA_ENFORCE_SYSFS flag set.
>
> That is to follow the rule: “allowing for collapsing in a VM without VM_HUGEPAGE in the "madvise" mode would be fine".
Can you add this rule in your commit message? It clarifies things.
>
> So I think we should still keep the TVA_ENFORCE_SYSFS flag.
Got it. Thank you for the explanation.
Acked-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Best Regards,
Yan, Zi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-30 2:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-29 8:23 [PATCH 0/2] fix MADV_COLLAPSE issue if THP " Baolin Wang
2025-05-29 8:23 ` [PATCH 1/2] mm: huge_memory: disallow hugepages if the system-wide THP sysfs " Baolin Wang
2025-05-29 15:10 ` Zi Yan
2025-05-30 1:51 ` Baolin Wang
2025-05-30 2:04 ` Zi Yan
2025-05-30 2:21 ` Baolin Wang
2025-05-30 2:22 ` Zi Yan
2025-05-29 8:23 ` [PATCH 2/2] mm: shmem: disallow hugepages if the system-wide shmem " Baolin Wang
2025-05-29 15:21 ` Zi Yan
2025-05-30 1:58 ` Baolin Wang
2025-05-30 2:17 ` Zi Yan
2025-05-30 2:32 ` Baolin Wang
2025-05-30 2:35 ` Zi Yan [this message]
2025-05-30 2:39 ` Baolin Wang
2025-05-30 8:04 ` [PATCH 0/2] fix MADV_COLLAPSE issue if THP " Ryan Roberts
2025-05-30 8:44 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-05-30 8:47 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-05-30 8:52 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-05-30 9:07 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-05-30 9:14 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-05-30 8:59 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-05-30 9:10 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-05-30 9:16 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-05-30 9:34 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-05-30 9:52 ` Baolin Wang
2025-05-30 10:45 ` David Hildenbrand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=548AFF46-93AF-40CB-80E4-372DAAA9F80B@nvidia.com \
--to=ziy@nvidia.com \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=npache@redhat.com \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox