From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail138.messagelabs.com (mail138.messagelabs.com [216.82.249.35]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 298E56B007B for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2010 06:17:02 -0500 (EST) Received: by ewy22 with SMTP id 22so461595ewy.10 for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2010 03:17:00 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: 2.6.31 and OOM killer = bug? Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1077) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Anton Starikov In-Reply-To: <20100215101917.15552a51.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 12:16:57 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <548A11C6-8C8C-45EF-92E7-72C3DF47F9FD@gmail.com> References: <20100215101917.15552a51.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "linux-mm@kvack.org" List-ID: On Feb 15, 2010, at 2:19 AM, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote: > At first, what is the version of kernel you are comparing with ? = 2.6.22?(If OpenSuse10) > If so, many changes since that.. Latest kernel version where OOM killer worked as it should in our setup = was 2.6.29. > Anyway, I think it's not appreciated to depend on OOM-Kill on = swapless-system. > I recommend you to use cgroup "memory" to encapsulate your apps (but = please check > the performance regression can be seen or not..) OK, I will check it. Thanks,=20 Anton.= -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org