[PATCH V3 2/2] x86/mm: use min instead of min_t

[Xishi Qiu <qiuxishi@huawei.com>]

The type of "MAX_DMA_PFN" and "xXx_pfn" are both unsigned long now, so use
min() instead of min_t().

Signed-off-by: Xishi Qiu <qiuxishi@huawei.com>
Suggested-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/e820.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c b/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c
index 49f8864..dd2f07a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c
@@ -1114,8 +1114,8 @@ void __init memblock_find_dma_reserve(void)
 	 * at first, and assume boot_mem will not take below MAX_DMA_PFN
 	 */
 	for_each_mem_pfn_range(i, MAX_NUMNODES, &start_pfn, &end_pfn, NULL) {
-		start_pfn = min_t(unsigned long, start_pfn, MAX_DMA_PFN);
-		end_pfn = min_t(unsigned long, end_pfn, MAX_DMA_PFN);
+		start_pfn = min(start_pfn, MAX_DMA_PFN);
+		end_pfn = min(end_pfn, MAX_DMA_PFN);
 		nr_pages += end_pfn - start_pfn;
 	}
 
-- 
2.0.0

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>