From: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
To: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@mina86.com>,
Weijie Yang <weijie.yang@samsung.com>
Cc: iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com, aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
'Andrew Morton' <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
'Linux-MM' <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
'linux-kernel' <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
'Weijie Yang' <weijie.yang.kh@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm, cma: make parameters order consistent in func declaration and definition
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 13:13:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <544E3702.8060508@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xa1td29h2zlo.fsf@mina86.com>
Hello,
On 2014-10-24 18:37, Michal Nazarewicz wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 24 2014, Weijie Yang <weijie.yang@samsung.com> wrote:
>> In the current code, the base and size parameters order is not consistent
>> in functions declaration and definition. If someone calls these functions
>> according to the declaration parameters order in cma.h, he will run into
>> some bug and it's hard to find the reason.
>>
>> This patch makes the parameters order consistent in functions declaration
>> and definition.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Weijie Yang <weijie.yang@samsung.com>
> Acked-by: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@mina86.com>
Applied to my fixes-for-v3.18 branch.
>> ---
>> include/linux/cma.h | 8 ++++----
>> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/cma.h b/include/linux/cma.h
>> index 0430ed0..a93438b 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/cma.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/cma.h
>> @@ -18,12 +18,12 @@ struct cma;
>> extern phys_addr_t cma_get_base(struct cma *cma);
>> extern unsigned long cma_get_size(struct cma *cma);
>>
>> -extern int __init cma_declare_contiguous(phys_addr_t size,
>> - phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t limit,
>> +extern int __init cma_declare_contiguous(phys_addr_t base,
>> + phys_addr_t size, phys_addr_t limit,
>> phys_addr_t alignment, unsigned int order_per_bit,
>> bool fixed, struct cma **res_cma);
>> -extern int cma_init_reserved_mem(phys_addr_t size,
>> - phys_addr_t base, int order_per_bit,
>> +extern int cma_init_reserved_mem(phys_addr_t base,
>> + phys_addr_t size, int order_per_bit,
>> struct cma **res_cma);
>> extern struct page *cma_alloc(struct cma *cma, int count, unsigned int align);
>> extern bool cma_release(struct cma *cma, struct page *pages, int count);
>> --
>> 1.7.0.4
Best regards
--
Marek Szyprowski, PhD
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-27 12:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-24 9:47 Weijie Yang
2014-10-24 16:37 ` Michal Nazarewicz
2014-10-27 12:13 ` Marek Szyprowski [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=544E3702.8060508@samsung.com \
--to=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mina86@mina86.com \
--cc=weijie.yang.kh@gmail.com \
--cc=weijie.yang@samsung.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox