Re: [PATCH] mm/mempolicy: fix sleeping function called from invalid context

[Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>]

On 2014/6/21 5:01, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, Li.
> 
> Sorry about the long delay.
> 
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 10:58:45AM +0800, Li Zefan wrote:
>> Yes, this is a long-standing issue. Besides the race you described, the child
>> task's mems_allowed can be wrong if the cpuset's nodemask changes before the
>> child has been added to the cgroup's tasklist.
>>
>> I remember Tejun once said he wanted to disallow task migration between
>> cgroups during fork, and that should fix this problem.
> 
> I'm having trouble remembering but yeah enforcing stricter behavior
> across fork could be beneficial.  Hmmm... the problem with making
> forks exclusive against migrations is that we'll end up adding more
> locking to the fork path which isn't too nice.
> 
> Hmmm... other controllers (cgroup_freezer) can reliably synchronize
> the child's state to the cgroup it belongs to.  Why can't cpuset?  Is
> there something fundamentally missing in the cgroup API?
> 

cgroup_freezer uses the fork callback. We can also do this for cpuset as
suggested by David, which adds a little bit overhead to the fork path.

David, care to send out a patch?

>>> It needs to be slightly rewritten to work properly without negatively 
>>> impacting the latency of fork().  Do you have the cycles to do it?
>>>
>>
>> Sounds you have other idea?
> 
> I don't think the suggested patch breaks anything more than it was
> broken before and we should probably apply it for the time being.  Li?
> 

Yeah, we should apply Gu Zheng's patch any way.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>