From: kbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
mmotm auto import <mm-commits@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
kbuild-all@01.org
Subject: [mmotm:master 449/499] lib/test_bpf.c:1401:16: sparse: symbol 'populate_skb' was not declared. Should it be static?
Date: Wed, 14 May 2014 19:26:55 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <537352ff.YeKAAIraVMbFPDYy%fengguang.wu@intel.com> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4272 bytes --]
tree: git://git.cmpxchg.org/linux-mmotm.git master
head: 1055821ba3c83218cbba4481f8349e3326cdaa32
commit: 802c295a15874b0287efd0bdeb1b3ebbacd4368b [449/499] lib/test_bpf.c: don't use gcc union shortcut
reproduce: make C=1 CF=-D__CHECK_ENDIAN__
sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
lib/test_bpf.c:87:17: sparse: advancing past deep designator
lib/test_bpf.c:99:17: sparse: advancing past deep designator
lib/test_bpf.c:114:17: sparse: advancing past deep designator
lib/test_bpf.c:132:17: sparse: advancing past deep designator
lib/test_bpf.c:148:17: sparse: advancing past deep designator
lib/test_bpf.c:159:17: sparse: advancing past deep designator
lib/test_bpf.c:169:17: sparse: advancing past deep designator
lib/test_bpf.c:182:17: sparse: advancing past deep designator
lib/test_bpf.c:196:17: sparse: advancing past deep designator
lib/test_bpf.c:209:17: sparse: advancing past deep designator
lib/test_bpf.c:223:17: sparse: advancing past deep designator
lib/test_bpf.c:244:17: sparse: advancing past deep designator
lib/test_bpf.c:255:17: sparse: advancing past deep designator
lib/test_bpf.c:266:17: sparse: advancing past deep designator
lib/test_bpf.c:277:17: sparse: advancing past deep designator
lib/test_bpf.c:296:17: sparse: advancing past deep designator
lib/test_bpf.c:307:17: sparse: advancing past deep designator
lib/test_bpf.c:321:17: sparse: advancing past deep designator
lib/test_bpf.c:335:17: sparse: advancing past deep designator
lib/test_bpf.c:346:17: sparse: advancing past deep designator
lib/test_bpf.c:361:17: sparse: advancing past deep designator
lib/test_bpf.c:375:17: sparse: advancing past deep designator
lib/test_bpf.c:409:17: sparse: advancing past deep designator
lib/test_bpf.c:428:17: sparse: advancing past deep designator
lib/test_bpf.c:449:17: sparse: advancing past deep designator
lib/test_bpf.c:471:17: sparse: advancing past deep designator
lib/test_bpf.c:484:17: sparse: advancing past deep designator
lib/test_bpf.c:497:17: sparse: advancing past deep designator
lib/test_bpf.c:516:17: sparse: advancing past deep designator
lib/test_bpf.c:548:17: sparse: advancing past deep designator
lib/test_bpf.c:580:17: sparse: advancing past deep designator
lib/test_bpf.c:638:17: sparse: advancing past deep designator
lib/test_bpf.c:657:17: sparse: advancing past deep designator
lib/test_bpf.c:673:17: sparse: advancing past deep designator
lib/test_bpf.c:689:17: sparse: advancing past deep designator
lib/test_bpf.c:706:17: sparse: advancing past deep designator
lib/test_bpf.c:723:17: sparse: advancing past deep designator
lib/test_bpf.c:885:17: sparse: advancing past deep designator
lib/test_bpf.c:1031:17: sparse: advancing past deep designator
lib/test_bpf.c:1164:17: sparse: advancing past deep designator
lib/test_bpf.c:1230:17: sparse: advancing past deep designator
lib/test_bpf.c:1292:17: sparse: advancing past deep designator
lib/test_bpf.c:1312:17: sparse: advancing past deep designator
lib/test_bpf.c:1329:17: sparse: advancing past deep designator
lib/test_bpf.c:1342:17: sparse: advancing past deep designator
lib/test_bpf.c:1351:17: sparse: advancing past deep designator
lib/test_bpf.c:1361:17: sparse: advancing past deep designator
lib/test_bpf.c:1372:17: sparse: advancing past deep designator
lib/test_bpf.c:1382:17: sparse: advancing past deep designator
>> lib/test_bpf.c:1401:16: sparse: symbol 'populate_skb' was not declared. Should it be static?
>> lib/test_bpf.c:1481:30: sparse: incorrect type in assignment (different address spaces)
lib/test_bpf.c:1481:30: expected struct sock_filter [noderef] <asn:1>*filter
lib/test_bpf.c:1481:30: got struct sock_filter *<noident>
>> lib/test_bpf.c:1482:45: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces)
lib/test_bpf.c:1482:45: expected struct sock_filter *[assigned] fp
lib/test_bpf.c:1482:45: got struct sock_filter [noderef] <asn:1>*filter
Please consider folding the attached diff :-)
---
0-DAY kernel build testing backend Open Source Technology Center
http://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/kbuild Intel Corporation
[-- Attachment #2: make-it-static-802c295a15874b0287efd0bdeb1b3ebbacd4368b.diff --]
[-- Type: text/x-diff, Size: 907 bytes --]
From: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH mmotm] lib/test_bpf.c: populate_skb() can be static
TO: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
CC: Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>
CC: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
CC: Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>
CC: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
---
test_bpf.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/lib/test_bpf.c b/lib/test_bpf.c
index 0fa58d2..f5a630a 100644
--- a/lib/test_bpf.c
+++ b/lib/test_bpf.c
@@ -1398,7 +1398,7 @@ static int get_length(struct sock_filter *fp)
}
struct net_device dev;
-struct sk_buff *populate_skb(char *buf, int size)
+static struct sk_buff *populate_skb(char *buf, int size)
{
struct sk_buff *skb;
reply other threads:[~2014-05-14 11:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=537352ff.YeKAAIraVMbFPDYy%fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--to=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=kbuild-all@01.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mm-commits@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox