From: Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>
To: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@hp.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com>,
aswin@hp.com, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ipc,shm: increase default size for shmmax
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 18:41:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5350042F.4040904@colorfullife.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHO5Pa2zguBEpg-S0Zx26qEStF5ZyvrnbU8-sQZfNJEZRMQPqg@mail.gmail.com>
On 04/17/2014 12:41 PM, Michael Kerrisk wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 12:46 AM, Andrew Morton
> <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
>> On Sun, 13 Apr 2014 20:05:34 +0200 Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Andrew,
>>>
>>> On 04/02/2014 12:08 AM, Andrew Morton wrote:
>>>> Well, I'm assuming 64GB==infinity. It *was* infinity in the RHEL5
>>>> timeframe, but infinity has since become larger so pickanumber.
>>> I think infinity is the right solution:
>>> The only common case where infinity is wrong would be Android - and
>>> Android disables sysv shm entirely.
>>>
>>> There are two patches:
>>> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=139730332306185&q=raw
>>> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=139727299800644&q=raw
>>>
>>> Could you apply one of them?
>>> I wrote the first one, thus I'm biased which one is better.
>> I like your patch because applying it might encourage you to send more
>> kernel patches - I miss the old days ;)
>>
>> But I do worry about disrupting existing systems so I like Davidlohr's
>> idea of making the change a no-op for people who are currently
>> explicitly setting shmmax and shmall.
> Agreed. It's hard to imagine situations where people might care
> nowadays, but there's no limits to people's insane inventiveness. Some
> people really might want to set an upper limit.
I don't understand that: neither patch has any impact after an explicit
sysctl that overwrites shmmax.
>> In an ideal world, system administrators would review this change,
> And in the ideal world, patches such as this would CC
> linux-api@vger.kernel.org, as described in
> Documentation/SubmitChecklist, so that users who care about getting
> advance warning on API changes could be alerted and might even review
> and comment...
Good point.
Davidlohr: Your patch has an impact on shmctl(,IPC_INFO,).
Could you add that for v3?
I'll try to make a v2 (with your update to the uapi header file) tomorrow.
--
Manfred
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-17 16:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-31 3:06 Davidlohr Bueso
2014-03-31 21:32 ` Andrew Morton
2014-03-31 22:59 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2014-03-31 23:13 ` Andrew Morton
2014-03-31 23:25 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2014-04-01 0:05 ` Andrew Morton
2014-04-01 6:29 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2014-04-01 19:19 ` Andrew Morton
2014-04-01 20:15 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2014-04-01 20:26 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2014-04-02 0:11 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2014-04-02 1:02 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2014-04-02 14:55 ` One Thousand Gnomes
2014-04-02 23:47 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2014-04-01 17:01 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2014-04-01 18:10 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2014-04-01 18:31 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2014-04-01 19:51 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2014-04-01 21:01 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2014-04-01 21:12 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2014-04-01 21:29 ` Andrew Morton
2014-04-01 21:41 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2014-04-01 21:48 ` Andrew Morton
2014-04-01 22:02 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2014-04-01 22:08 ` Andrew Morton
2014-04-13 18:05 ` Manfred Spraul
2014-04-13 23:15 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2014-04-16 22:46 ` Andrew Morton
2014-04-16 23:19 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2014-04-17 10:41 ` Michael Kerrisk
2014-04-17 16:41 ` Manfred Spraul [this message]
2014-04-17 20:19 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2014-04-01 22:49 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2014-04-01 23:28 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2014-04-01 23:56 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2014-04-02 0:40 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2014-04-02 1:08 ` Greg Thelen
2014-04-02 1:58 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2014-04-02 2:11 ` Greg Thelen
2014-04-03 0:20 ` [PATCH] ipc,shm: disable shmmax and shmall by default Davidlohr Bueso
2014-04-03 14:07 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2014-04-03 19:02 ` Manfred Spraul
2014-04-03 19:50 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2014-04-03 23:39 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2014-04-04 5:00 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2014-04-05 18:24 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2014-04-06 6:42 ` Manfred Spraul
2014-04-06 16:54 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2014-04-03 22:29 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2014-04-03 23:47 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2014-04-11 18:28 ` Manfred Spraul
2014-04-11 20:27 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2014-04-11 20:48 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2014-04-12 8:50 ` Manfred Spraul
2014-04-12 15:33 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2014-04-01 21:43 ` [PATCH] ipc,shm: increase default size for shmmax Davidlohr Bueso
2014-04-01 19:26 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5350042F.4040904@colorfullife.com \
--to=manfred@colorfullife.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aswin@hp.com \
--cc=davidlohr@hp.com \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mtk.manpages@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox