From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20F7EC83F21 for ; Sat, 12 Jul 2025 09:28:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 48A566B00AC; Sat, 12 Jul 2025 05:28:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 462786B00AE; Sat, 12 Jul 2025 05:28:32 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 39F036B00B0; Sat, 12 Jul 2025 05:28:32 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0013.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.13]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 292CE6B00AC for ; Sat, 12 Jul 2025 05:28:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin24.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay09.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 985A280133 for ; Sat, 12 Jul 2025 09:28:31 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 83655087222.24.86479E8 Received: from maynard.decadent.org.uk (maynard.decadent.org.uk [65.21.191.19]) by imf05.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A576F100007 for ; Sat, 12 Jul 2025 09:28:29 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: imf05.hostedemail.com; spf=pass (imf05.hostedemail.com: domain of ben@decadent.org.uk designates 65.21.191.19 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=ben@decadent.org.uk ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-20220608; d=hostedemail.com; t=1752312510; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=ktE2nzTnl8T9Lpfqq48WzcU6UQEb7jJSsDboVs3y2C0Ypv8tFkkYzzxXI/RZAiW1A2th3/ aXKbULf1JfSVXv4OZ+VEhJpOEUdXYDG69q35x6aoc1fiLUpqHf05T0mCtOPpNX1xGDO2cY 9ENIrt9J6Xmt59TLrvv/hMGchPwqQO8= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; imf05.hostedemail.com; dkim=none; spf=pass (imf05.hostedemail.com: domain of ben@decadent.org.uk designates 65.21.191.19 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=ben@decadent.org.uk; dmarc=none ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hostedemail.com; s=arc-20220608; t=1752312510; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=tJ4RmXf5Vw0fl1jfnnlOSvdK67pCm8JY1PdZ7k5rgBE=; b=iVRFZeKWu1AVaDmxf//qxFYGAJFuEEFsDIunz2eEEv4ZAFSwKYtlIntdc0kh7r8nupM4C1 ntnWr1Wexs/5pccXweZxkWXojcvjpOXZlkDaOhCRZl68QHhqMMqzIERH0l4T2hSITnPpSX jLXeA/fxOlNUAtLu92shn/KLWIJpgoY= Received: from [89.234.162.240] (helo=deadeye) by maynard with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1uaWWv-0057Ds-02; Sat, 12 Jul 2025 09:28:25 +0000 Received: from ben by deadeye with local (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1uaWWt-0000000052m-2W6X; Sat, 12 Jul 2025 11:28:23 +0200 Message-ID: <534accb98e487e4891cb58e846bd556f5f40192b.camel@decadent.org.uk> Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] cgroup: Do not report unavailable v1 controllers in /proc/cgroups From: Ben Hutchings To: Michal =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Koutn=FD?= Cc: cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Tejun Heo , Zefan Li , Johannes Weiner , Michal Hocko , Roman Gushchin , Shakeel Butt , Muchun Song , Andrew Morton , Chen Ridong , 1108294@bugs.debian.org Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2025 11:28:13 +0200 In-Reply-To: References: <20240909163223.3693529-1-mkoutny@suse.com> <20240909163223.3693529-5-mkoutny@suse.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-cT6qxrHnB9rp+OvPm40I" User-Agent: Evolution 3.56.1-1 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 89.234.162.240 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ben@decadent.org.uk X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on maynard); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Rspam-User: X-Rspamd-Server: rspam05 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: A576F100007 X-Stat-Signature: f1j88waf1o7j3fga41rsxm7o1feobyin X-HE-Tag: 1752312509-999192 X-HE-Meta: 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 PSERs6OX 6k8iuKyH+HFtwEoPj760QBsZIV4CPrTTv5DdhomyJjxhFmvwXRrfwWffMZgw6A4pdJgUjNceVDt5QbRZUPgOHgSFoxKb1wG/Xi3GShidjtthr8TJWkHPjshwkXr+3Pw+wioV5P6vpnYkUr1tLJmq34W8lfQ== X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: --=-cT6qxrHnB9rp+OvPm40I Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 2025-07-11 at 15:10 +0200, Michal Koutn=C3=BD wrote: > Hello Ben. >=20 > On Wed, Jul 09, 2025 at 08:22:09PM +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > Would you consider reverting this change for the sake of compatibility? >=20 > As you write, it's not fatally broken and it may be "just" an issue of > container images that got no fresh rebuild. (And I think it should be > generally discouraged running containers with stale deps in them.) >=20 > The original patch would mainly serve legacy userspace (host) setups on > top of contemporary kernel (besides API purity reasons). Admittedly, > these should be rare and eventually extinct in contrast with your > example where it's a containerized userspace (which typically could do > no cgroup setup) that may still have some user demand. >=20 > So, I'd be more confident with the revert if such an adjustment was > carried downstream by some distro and proven its viability first. Do you > know of any in the wild? The revert has just gone into Debian unstable, targetting the upcoming stable release. So at this point I can't confidently state that it won't also cause regressions. Ben. >=20 > I appreciate your report, > Michal --=20 Ben Hutchings Experience is directly proportional to the value of equipment destroyed - Carolyn Scheppner --=-cT6qxrHnB9rp+OvPm40I Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEErCspvTSmr92z9o8157/I7JWGEQkFAmhyKq4ACgkQ57/I7JWG EQkKhQ//eWfqhXyOWqMzlP2vxVnhpiFkPwgsE1Ywa4rklf/VGeZK0SJYWy0762UK liXBG2Dmnr0428I/QRIZxviHgUciBL8deyV60DpL4IrlFTmOuRjw0WKF+9AFWBVj sZNWvS2F75T3zK5H+reRgW3kBWKh2TVKorRTw4EuHNJrOso+BmZP4Rv+ZVcj9/Vj 5SDCpsKuX5BMfUwp5xjcHklESqUQS2/t4p5jGsGXq1I4bIwfff4uwuRGhO6au74Y FVAvrnvLyODtQSONif8X8WlQVb0sJ7lr/onQVbHqwZ9DFYL6Yv21IeVTXk3cpWgf yfMtsAvncubsF9o9HCvisGsenD0ECNKk8fIcs1C3vjc2GD2NezfIfMsDMpO2AYdv eGOb/at7gYHuE1/3XrIEf2Cf+SoA0i8iOWzK6HnmmZ9B0LhvvPnQLTXTb7CahPtG eDsLlVUa4KoNv88f+27bg65BJ0iqR2RQDhTRBL2/IdQyG567p5BXi1PPIH62fTqn e285UgQIsStvftnpiqiwLt2E6oD+FTenOnY/JVUIw+XffneMc5dnjXRJgIYjLTVE SKU3fstQs8aoLBtmGj1E8CnBdyHAs7B8rmxYCXuXkriqGEHIhnHRHHkiw4rVg/DX 7m43mQeDYXE62pRK8v4vaoTGfI/v0hoU/ASxrLM21kGwf3BPMRo= =jcEx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-cT6qxrHnB9rp+OvPm40I--