From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Linux-X86 <x86@kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>, Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Steven Noonan <steven@uplinklabs.net>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] mm: use paravirt friendly ops for NUMA hinting ptes
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2014 18:21:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53443018.2090408@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1396962570-18762-5-git-send-email-mgorman@suse.de>
On 08/04/14 14:09, Mel Gorman wrote:
> David Vrabel identified a regression when using automatic NUMA balancing
> under Xen whereby page table entries were getting corrupted due to the
> use of native PTE operations. Quoting him
>
> Xen PV guest page tables require that their entries use machine
> addresses if the preset bit (_PAGE_PRESENT) is set, and (for
> successful migration) non-present PTEs must use pseudo-physical
> addresses. This is because on migration MFNs in present PTEs are
> translated to PFNs (canonicalised) so they may be translated back
> to the new MFN in the destination domain (uncanonicalised).
>
> pte_mknonnuma(), pmd_mknonnuma(), pte_mknuma() and pmd_mknuma()
> set and clear the _PAGE_PRESENT bit using pte_set_flags(),
> pte_clear_flags(), etc.
>
> In a Xen PV guest, these functions must translate MFNs to PFNs
> when clearing _PAGE_PRESENT and translate PFNs to MFNs when setting
> _PAGE_PRESENT.
>
> His suggested fix converted p[te|md]_[set|clear]_flags to using
> paravirt-friendly ops but this is overkill. He suggested an alternative of
> using p[te|md]_modify in the NUMA page table operations but this is does
> more work than necessary and would require looking up a VMA for protections.
>
> This patch modifies the NUMA page table operations to use paravirt friendly
> operations to set/clear the flags of interest. Unfortunately this will take
> a performance hit when updating the PTEs on CONFIG_PARAVIRT but I do not
> see a way around it that does not break Xen.
Acked-by: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
It passed my mprotect() PROT_NONE -> PROT_READ test case so
Tested-by: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
I'll leave it up to the x86 maintainers to decide which fix to take.
This one or the more generic "x86: use pv-ops in
{pte,pmd}_{set,clear}_flags()"
David
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-08 17:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-08 13:09 [RFC PATCH 0/5] Use an alternative to _PAGE_PROTNONE for _PAGE_NUMA v2 Mel Gorman
2014-04-08 13:09 ` [PATCH 1/5] x86: Require x86-64 for automatic NUMA balancing Mel Gorman
2014-04-08 13:09 ` [PATCH 2/5] x86: Define _PAGE_NUMA by reusing software bits on the PMD and PTE levels Mel Gorman
2014-04-08 13:09 ` [PATCH 3/5] mm: Allow FOLL_NUMA on FOLL_FORCE Mel Gorman
2014-04-08 13:09 ` [PATCH 4/5] mm: use paravirt friendly ops for NUMA hinting ptes Mel Gorman
2014-04-08 17:21 ` David Vrabel [this message]
2014-04-15 10:27 ` David Vrabel
2014-04-15 14:44 ` Mel Gorman
2014-04-08 13:09 ` [PATCH 5/5] x86: Allow Xen to enable NUMA_BALANCING Mel Gorman
2014-04-08 14:40 ` [RFC PATCH 0/5] Use an alternative to _PAGE_PROTNONE for _PAGE_NUMA v2 H. Peter Anvin
2014-04-08 15:22 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-04-08 16:04 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-04-08 16:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-08 16:46 ` Mel Gorman
2014-04-08 17:01 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-04-08 18:51 ` Mel Gorman
2014-04-08 18:55 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-04-08 19:06 ` Mel Gorman
2014-04-08 19:08 ` Rik van Riel
2014-04-08 17:03 ` Mel Gorman
2014-04-08 17:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-08 17:41 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-04-08 18:16 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2014-04-09 6:21 ` Ingo Molnar
2014-04-09 23:34 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-04-10 0:12 ` Linus Torvalds
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53443018.2090408@citrix.com \
--to=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=gorcunov@gmail.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=steven@uplinklabs.net \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox