From: "Mizuma, Masayoshi" <m.mizuma@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>,
Wanpeng Li <liwanp@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Aneesh Kumar <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Subject: [PATCH] mm: hugetlb: fix softlockup when a large number of hugepages are freed.
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 19:43:32 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <533946D4.1060305@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
Hi,
When I decrease the value of nr_hugepage in procfs a lot, softlockup happens.
It is because there is no chance of context switch during this process.
On the other hand, when I allocate a large number of hugepages,
there is some chance of context switch. Hence softlockup doesn't happen
during this process. So it's necessary to add the context switch
in the freeing process as same as allocating process to avoid softlockup.
When I freed 12 TB hugapages with kernel-2.6.32-358.el6, the freeing process
occupied a CPU over 150 seconds and following softlockup message appeared
twice or more.
--
$ echo 6000000 > /proc/sys/vm/nr_hugepages
$ cat /proc/sys/vm/nr_hugepages
6000000
$ grep ^Huge /proc/meminfo
HugePages_Total: 6000000
HugePages_Free: 6000000
HugePages_Rsvd: 0
HugePages_Surp: 0
Hugepagesize: 2048 kB
$ echo 0 > /proc/sys/vm/nr_hugepages
BUG: soft lockup - CPU#16 stuck for 67s! [sh:12883] ...
Pid: 12883, comm: sh Not tainted 2.6.32-358.el6.x86_64 #1
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff8115a438>] ? free_pool_huge_page+0xb8/0xd0
[<ffffffff8115a578>] ? set_max_huge_pages+0x128/0x190
[<ffffffff8115c663>] ? hugetlb_sysctl_handler_common+0x113/0x140
[<ffffffff8115c6de>] ? hugetlb_sysctl_handler+0x1e/0x20
[<ffffffff811f3097>] ? proc_sys_call_handler+0x97/0xd0
[<ffffffff811f30e4>] ? proc_sys_write+0x14/0x20
[<ffffffff81180f98>] ? vfs_write+0xb8/0x1a0
[<ffffffff81181891>] ? sys_write+0x51/0x90
[<ffffffff810dc565>] ? __audit_syscall_exit+0x265/0x290
[<ffffffff8100b072>] ? system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
--
I have not confirmed this problem with upstream kernels because I am not
able to prepare the machine equipped with 12TB memory now.
However I confirmed that the amount of decreasing hugepages was directly
proportional to the amount of required time.
I measured required times on a smaller machine. It showed 130-145 hugepages
decreased in a millisecond.
Amount of decreasing Required time Decreasing rate
hugepages (msec) (pages/msec)
------------------------------------------------------------
10,000 pages == 20GB 70 - 74 135-142
30,000 pages == 60GB 208 - 229 131-144
It means decrement of 6TB hugepages will trigger softlockup with the default
threshold 20sec, in this decreasing rate.
Signed-off-by: Masayoshi Mizuma <m.mizuma@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Cc: Wanpeng Li <liwanp@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Aneesh Kumar <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
---
mm/hugetlb.c | 1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
index 7d57af2..fe67f2c 100644
--- a/mm/hugetlb.c
+++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
@@ -1535,6 +1535,7 @@ static unsigned long set_max_huge_pages(struct hstate *h, unsigned long count,
while (min_count < persistent_huge_pages(h)) {
if (!free_pool_huge_page(h, nodes_allowed, 0))
break;
+ cond_resched_lock(&hugetlb_lock);
}
while (count < persistent_huge_pages(h)) {
if (!adjust_pool_surplus(h, nodes_allowed, 1))
--
1.7.1
Thanks,
Masayoshi Mizuma
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next reply other threads:[~2014-03-31 10:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-31 10:43 Mizuma, Masayoshi [this message]
2014-03-31 15:02 ` Naoya Horiguchi
2014-03-31 19:30 ` Andrew Morton
2014-04-01 7:02 ` Masayoshi Mizuma
[not found] ` <1396278140-k1hmxq77@n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>
2014-04-01 6:53 ` Masayoshi Mizuma
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=533946D4.1060305@jp.fujitsu.com \
--to=m.mizuma@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=liwanp@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox