From: Peng Zhang <zhangpeng.00@bytedance.com>
To: "Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@Oracle.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
Peng Zhang <zhangpeng.00@bytedance.com>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, maple-tree@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/10] maple_tree: Drop mtree_alloc_{range,rrange}() and related functions.
Date: Tue, 16 May 2023 08:39:29 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52da839c-f23f-3341-961d-a253003bfbb3@bytedance.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230515173516.5tmytjvnzvdogfm7@revolver>
在 2023/5/16 01:35, Liam R. Howlett 写道:
> * Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> [230515 13:27]:
>> On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 09:17:49PM +0800, Peng Zhang wrote:
>>> Drop mtree_alloc_{range,rrange}(), mas_{rev_}alloc() and mas_fill_gap().
>>> mtree_alloc_{range,rrange}() currently have no users and can be easily
>>> implemented with mas_empty_area{_rev}(). mas_{rev_}alloc() and
>>> mas_fill_gap() are just their internal functions, drop them together.
>>
>> No, I think this is the wrong way to go.
>>
>> Most users should not be using the mas_* API. These are the advanced
>> APIs. Most users will want to use mtree_alloc_range(). Just like most
>> users of the XArray use the xa_insert() API rather than open-coding the
>> xa_state and calling the xas_* APIs.
>>
>> Please read Documentation/core-api/xarray.rst and maple_tree.rst for more
>> details on Normal vs Advanced API. The real problem is that we have so
>> few users today, so you haven't seen that most people don't want to use
>> the advanced APIs.
>
>
> Peng, Apologies on the confusion. Please do as Matthew said. If you
> have a way to unify the functionality to use the same internal
> functions, then I think that would be a welcome change.
>
I will implement new mtree_alloc_{range,rrange}() using other internal
functions.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-16 0:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-15 13:17 [PATCH 00/10] Clean ups for maple tree Peng Zhang
2023-05-15 13:17 ` [PATCH 01/10] maple_tree: Drop the test code for mtree_alloc_{range,rrange}() Peng Zhang
2023-05-15 16:52 ` Liam R. Howlett
2023-05-15 13:17 ` [PATCH 02/10] maple_tree: Drop mtree_alloc_{range,rrange}() and related functions Peng Zhang
2023-05-15 16:52 ` Liam R. Howlett
2023-05-15 17:27 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-05-15 17:35 ` Liam R. Howlett
2023-05-16 0:39 ` Peng Zhang [this message]
2023-05-15 13:17 ` [PATCH 03/10] maple_tree: Remove __must_hold() which does not work Peng Zhang
2023-05-15 14:55 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-05-16 0:42 ` Peng Zhang
2023-05-15 15:00 ` Liam R. Howlett
2023-05-15 13:17 ` [PATCH 04/10] maple_tree: Simplify mas_is_span_wr() Peng Zhang
2023-05-15 16:06 ` Liam R. Howlett
2023-05-15 13:17 ` [PATCH 05/10] maple_tree: Make the code symmetrical in mas_wr_extend_null() Peng Zhang
2023-05-15 16:54 ` Liam R. Howlett
2023-05-15 13:17 ` [PATCH 06/10] maple_tree: Wrap the replace operation with an inline function Peng Zhang
2023-05-15 17:07 ` Liam R. Howlett
2023-05-16 0:46 ` Peng Zhang
2023-05-16 14:16 ` Liam R. Howlett
2023-05-16 14:22 ` Peng Zhang
2023-05-15 13:17 ` [PATCH 07/10] maple_tree: Add mas_wr_new_end() to calculate new_end accurately Peng Zhang
2023-05-15 13:17 ` [PATCH 08/10] maple_tree: Add comments and some minor cleanups to mas_wr_append() Peng Zhang
2023-05-15 17:29 ` Liam R. Howlett
2023-05-16 10:06 ` Peng Zhang
2023-05-15 13:17 ` [PATCH 09/10] maple_tree: Rework mas_wr_slot_store() to be cleaner and more efficient Peng Zhang
2023-05-15 18:01 ` Liam R. Howlett
2023-05-16 7:27 ` Peng Zhang
2023-05-16 14:17 ` Liam R. Howlett
2023-05-15 13:17 ` [PATCH 10/10] maple_tree: Simplify and clean up mas_wr_node_store() Peng Zhang
2023-05-15 18:58 ` Liam R. Howlett
2023-05-16 0:36 ` Peng Zhang
2023-05-16 10:53 ` Peng Zhang
2023-05-16 15:52 ` Liam R. Howlett
2023-05-16 23:53 ` Peng Zhang
2023-05-17 3:10 ` Peng Zhang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52da839c-f23f-3341-961d-a253003bfbb3@bytedance.com \
--to=zhangpeng.00@bytedance.com \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@Oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=maple-tree@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox