From: Damian Dudycz <damiandudycz@yahoo.com>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, sam@gentoo.org,
holger@applied-asynchrony.com, kernel@gentoo.org,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Subject: Re: OOMs on PS3 since kernel 6.9-rc4
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2024 19:43:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52FFF38B-15C2-487C-9D0D-AF9EDB7D9B74@yahoo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240925172045.GA876370@cmpxchg.org>
Thank you for the response Johannes.
I’ll test this and get back with the results.
Also, I should mention - Holger have suggested to enable LRU and this also seems to be helping with this issue, but
still I thought I should report it when it’s not enabled.
I’ll see if compaction helps and let you know if it helped.
Regards,
Damian.
> Wiadomość napisana przez Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> w dniu 25 wrz 2024, o godz. 19:20:
>
> Hi Damian,
>
> On Tue, Sep 24, 2024 at 10:52:28PM +0200, Damian Dudycz wrote:
>> I'm running Gentoo on the PlayStation 3 console (PPC64BE CPU), using custom
>> firmware (OtherOS++) feature.
>>
>> Upgrading from 6.6 to 6.10, I have noticed that OOM kills started during long
>> and intense processes, like compiling code or extracting a large archive.
>>
>> The OOM usually occurs after about 10-20 minutes of for example
>> compiling the gentoo-kernel package.
>
> Thanks for your excellent and detailed report, and sorry about the
> breakage.
>
> While going through the dmesg, I'm noticing the following:
>
> [ 719.989545] configure invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x400dc0(GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT|__GFP_ZERO), order=2, oom_score_adj=0
> [ 719.989607] COMPACTION is disabled!!!
> [ 719.989633] CPU: 1 PID: 4701 Comm: configure Not tainted 6.9.0-rc4-test-00116-gc0cd6f557b90-dirty #1
> [ 719.989665] Hardware name: SonyPS3 Cell Broadband Engine 0x702100 PS3
> [ 719.989688] Call Trace:
> [ 719.989708] [c00000000a5834a0] [c000000000662e9c] .dump_stack_lvl+0xb0/0x100 (unreliable)
> [ 719.989777] [c00000000a583530] [c00000000013e43c] .dump_header+0x5c/0x414
> [ 719.989835] [c00000000a583600] [c00000000013ec38] .oom_kill_process+0xcc/0x598
> [ 719.989888] [c00000000a5836f0] [c00000000013f6f0] .out_of_memory+0x3d0/0x3f0
> [ 719.989939] [c00000000a5837a0] [c00000000018f28c] .__alloc_pages_slowpath.constprop.0+0x540/0x6b0
> [ 719.989987] [c00000000a5838f0] [c00000000018f4f4] .__alloc_pages_noprof+0xf8/0x1c0
> [ 719.990031] [c00000000a5839c0] [c0000000000505d0] .copy_process+0x1d4/0x1bf0
> [ 719.990085] [c00000000a583b40] [c000000000052144] .kernel_clone+0xcc/0x3f0
> [ 719.990136] [c00000000a583c50] [c0000000000524d4] .__do_sys_clone+0x6c/0x90
> [ 719.990188] [c00000000a583d80] [c00000000001f600] .system_call_exception+0x1f4/0x260
> [ 719.990246] [c00000000a583e10] [c00000000000b2d4] system_call_common+0xf4/0x258
>
> This is clone() trying to allocate a thread stack, which is a request
> for 4 physically contiguous pages (order=2 -> 2^2 pages).
>
> The second line warns that you don't have CONFIG_COMPACTION enabled,
> which is the kernel's facility to assemble such contiguous page
> blocks. (God bless you, Michal Hocko, for adding this warning.)
>
> This is not a common configuration anymore, as we have since removed
> various other mechanisms from the MM code to support higher order
> allocations. So I think you may have gotten lucky in the past.
>
> Can you please try with CONFIG_COMPACTION=y?
>
> [ I think what likely happened is that, before my patch, an unmovable
> request falling back to a movable block would have stolen the rest
> of its free pages even if it hadn't claimed the block as unmovable.
> Now it doesn't anymore, and the block, already dominated by cache
> and anon, will continue to fill up with cache and anon. Not an issue
> with compaction - and better for long-term defragmentation
> prospects; but without compaction, you just get a bit less lucky
> specifically with those higher-order kernel requests. ]
>
> Thanks
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-25 17:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <7CE7C8BC-D728-4A10-BD8F-15293D7CF312.ref@yahoo.com>
2024-09-24 20:52 ` Damian Dudycz
2024-09-25 17:20 ` Johannes Weiner
2024-09-25 17:43 ` Damian Dudycz [this message]
2024-09-26 7:00 ` Damian Dudycz
2024-09-26 10:34 ` Johannes Weiner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52FFF38B-15C2-487C-9D0D-AF9EDB7D9B74@yahoo.com \
--to=damiandudycz@yahoo.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=holger@applied-asynchrony.com \
--cc=kernel@gentoo.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=sam@gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox