From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-lb0-f177.google.com (mail-lb0-f177.google.com [209.85.217.177]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 008876B0035 for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2014 02:19:58 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-lb0-f177.google.com with SMTP id z5so4958003lbh.22 for ; Sun, 02 Feb 2014 23:19:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from relay.parallels.com (relay.parallels.com. [195.214.232.42]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ov7si3252925lbb.70.2014.02.02.23.19.39 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 02 Feb 2014 23:19:39 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <52EF4309.2040103@parallels.com> Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2014 11:19:37 +0400 From: Vladimir Davydov MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] memcg: export kmemcg cache id via cgroup fs References: <570a97e4dfaded0939a9ddbea49055019dcc5803.1391356789.git.vdavydov@parallels.com> <52EF3DBF.3000404@parallels.com> In-Reply-To: <52EF3DBF.3000404@parallels.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: David Rientjes , akpm@linux-foundation.org, mhocko@suse.cz, penberg@kernel.org, cl@linux.com, glommer@gmail.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, devel@openvz.org, Johannes Weiner , Hugh Dickins [adding Johannes Weiner and Hugh Dickins to cc in case they have something to object against this] On 02/03/2014 10:57 AM, Vladimir Davydov wrote: > On 02/03/2014 10:21 AM, David Rientjes wrote: >> On Sun, 2 Feb 2014, Vladimir Davydov wrote: >> >>> Per-memcg kmem caches are named as follows: >>> >>> (:) >>> >>> where is the unique id of the memcg the cache belongs >>> to, is the relative name of the memcg on the cgroup fs. >>> Cache names are exposed to userspace for debugging purposes (e.g. via >>> sysfs in case of slub or via dmesg). >>> >>> Using relative names makes it impossible in general (in case the cgroup >>> hierarchy is not flat) to find out which memcg a particular cache >>> belongs to, because is not known to the user. Since >>> using absolute cgroup names would be an overkill, let's fix this by >>> exporting the id of kmem-active memcg via cgroup fs file >>> "memory.kmem.id". >>> >> Hmm, I'm not sure exporting additional information is the best way to do >> it only for this purpose. I do understand the problem in naming >> collisions if the hierarchy isn't flat and we typically work around that >> by ensuring child memcgs still have a unique memcg. This isn't only a >> problem in slab cache naming, me also avoid printing the entire absolute >> names for things like the oom killer. > AFAIU, cgroup identifiers dumped on oom (cgroup paths, currently) and > memcg slab cache names serve for different purposes. The point is oom is > a perfectly normal situation for the kernel, and info dumped to dmesg is > for admin to find out the cause of the problem (a greedy user or > cgroup). On the other hand, slab cache names are dumped to dmesg only on > extraordinary situations - like bugs in slab implementation, or double > free, or detected memory leaks - where we usually do not need the name > of the memcg that triggered the problem, because the bug is likely to be > in the kernel subsys using the cache. Plus, the names are exported to > sysfs in case of slub, again for debugging purposes, AFAIK. So IMO the > use cases for oom vs slab names are completely different - information > vs debugging - and I want to export kmem.id only for the ability of > debugging kmemcg and slab subsystems. > >> So it would be nice to have >> consensus on how people are supposed to identify memcgs with a hierarchy: >> either by exporting information like the id like you do here (but leave >> the oom killer still problematic) or by insisting people name their memcgs >> with unique names if they care to differentiate them. > Anyway, I agree with you that this needs a consensus, because this is a > functional change. > > Thanks. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org